As usual Caitlin nails it. I'm saving this to send to friends and family who keep throwing the 'but trump' at me for supporting Jill Stein. Maybe this piece will show them how ridiculous they look to me. Thanks!
Yvonne. They simply don't care about being ridiculous.
The press move on to something else the next day (more than often on purpose) and until I am told differently, I would be prepared to say that the greatest majority of people in the US still accept the press headlines as gospel and yet are unaware (or choose to be unaware) that the same press are more than capable of changing that headline around to suit the climate, their climate that is, the next day......for a reason. The CIA / FBI / Political manipulators / NYT / CNN / Fox / and on... and on... climate.
The people, or until recently what appeared to be the majority of people (from "surveys") supported the ramblings and ravings of a man called Trump. Nasty comments, his observations on other candidates. They were well reported and damned rude at times but the next day was another day with other subjects of interest and in true media fashion, off they went, all 24 hour old comments then forgotten. They know they will be more today. That's the priority. The media industry requires that to maintain what has now been accepted by most as media credibility.,(2024 style).
There was a time in the past when someone like Trump would not survive after some of the things he has said over time. But these days........
Yvonne I will gladly take the chance of another Trump presidency by voting for Stein. I am sick and tired of the lessor of two evils vote. Harris will be the dark skinned female baby killer. I can't stand watching the high fives, cash hauls, and giddy euphoria of Harris/Walz as if happy times are here again. We are financing the slaughter of an entire population. No amount of calls for restraint work anymore. Every dead Palestinian and Ukrainian is on the Ray Banned baby killer's head. Unforgivable. And Harris? Too soon to tell but I'd imagine that she will lay prostrate in front of Bibi. Nothing against Jews but she has a Jewish husband, Jewish Secretary of State, Jewish AG. Chances are they all defend Israel's right to defend itself (Translation: Kill anyone, anytime, anywhere). Every nation has that right but it's obvious that when our feckless politicians say that they mean it's Ok to commit wanton murder in the name of reelection. Abortion overseas? Perfectly acceptable and indeed advantageous as long as our bombs do the abortions. Not encouraging. Bad optics at least for Gaza. If I am wrong, then I will admit it and still vote for Stein. Last thought. Joe I see you are concerned about your legacy. Senator Credit Card, you are a baby killer. That's your legacy. Live with it. And quit blubbering about your dead son. I am a father too. I empathize with your pain. But as a father I do not have the power to kill millions of people for nothing. I know you loved your boy. So do the the parents of the babies killed by your bombs. So think about their pain and call off your attack dogs by suspending all military aid until a permanent ceasefire is obtained.
The US has been financing the slaughter of many populations and millions of children for over 80 YEARS now. Palestine is just one more to add to the pile.
It’s time to create a better government whilst not creating even more graves.
That’s the challenge.
Arguing over which politicians to trust is futile.
Start the creation of the new system ; NOW. That will take much more than sharing thoughts, memes, and insults over social media platforms. We must do something concrete and real that takes time, sacrifice, discipline and patience: “getting off the couch” is easy: spending more time off of that couch takes real effort. Right now rescuing kids and families out of the Palestinian Holocaust is of immediate and paramount importance.
Then start DE constructing ALL of the systems that create and support such death camps. Again that will take time and sacrifice to accomplish: decades of it.
Alice, Tweedledum and Tweedledee all engage in a moral discussion about the poem after it has been recited. Alice springs upon its most obvious and simple moral conclusion by saying that she “like[s] the Walrus best” because “he was a little sorry for the oysters” (Carroll, pg.141). Tweedledee challenges this assertion by revealing that “he ate more than the Carpenter” (Carroll, pg.141). When this changes Alice’s mind, his brother points out that the Carpenter “ate as many as he could get” (Carroll, pg.141). They are then forced to come to the conclusion that both the Carpenter and the Walrus are “very unpleasant characters” (Carroll, pg.141).
It’s a salient and valid argument regarding the true ruling classes and the distractions set up to properly “educate” and “lead” the populace to distract them from The “Matrix” they has, in fact, been slowly feeding on, and consuming them alive.
What politicians say, but continue to do the opposite is called lip service. Also the main stream media not only supports the hyenas, they actually blame the children and their parents for bothering the hyenas.
"What politicians say, but continue to do the opposite" is something I noticed when I was about 7 years old when the local priest announced that we should love one another..... been trying to figure that out ever since...but the evidence has been removed.
"Maybe we should be fighting the fact that powerful interest groups exert so much control over our electoral and governmental systems that they can force the advancement of extremely depraved agendas with no accountability to the electorate, instead of fighting over which child killer we should be electing to lower children into the hyena pit!”
Well said! Shut down the hyena pit forever! Lock up the hyena masters! Put Sally into a mental institution where hopefully her delusions about a "sad hyena master" will go away...
Nailed it! People rationalize away what they don't want to see as evil, and that's always easiest when the evil is inflicted on a "them". We humans are the greatest liars (rationalizers).
Yes indeed Patricia, that old Billy Joel song about honesty being so hard to find sure was the truth, and it even applies, or shall we say that it most especially applies to honesty with ourselves too.
k'mala doesn't have children, she can't relate. Many of current folks at power in the west are childless, some of them through perversion. That says a lot.
Did I say all childless people support murder of children?
If you deny there's a difference between people who have children (their own, having gone through the whole process) and those who do not in respect to viewing the world, then you are fundamentally challenged.
Wow. That is a crazy "I am superior." position just because you have done the easiest thing in the world (procreate). I was a camp counsellor at a camp for terminally and chronically ill children for 3 summers, an au pair for an 8 month old baby for a year (they moved to a different state, wanted me to come with them, but I had to decline... But I am still in regular contact with that boy and his parents 26 years later and he says I am one of his favorite "uncles" even though he has no memory of when I took care of him.), and a daily (5 days a week) babysitter for two young boys for almost 3 years, so I know you are talking shit about how being a parent somehow elevates you into a moist cloud of compassion for all children. Typically, parents are hyper concerned only about their own kids. (the Israeli generals, soldiers, and politicians have children, as do most of the US politicians who invited, and applauded continuously, that Israeli genocidal baby-killer to speak before the senate) , AND I had a vasectomy at age 25 because I felt, and still feel 30+ years later, that 1.) the world is a crappy place to bring a new being into and 2.) if I really wanted to be a parent I could adopt one because the last thing this world needs is another narcissitic creation of yet another mouth (and anus).
"That is a crazy "I am superior." position" - where did I say that? Why did that particular notion - superiority - come to your mind? Look in the mirror and ask yourself.
"AND I had a vasectomy at age 25" - so you don't have children by choice and will be defending your decision to death - quite literally - because you have no other option. You will die and if everyone does what you did the humanity will die in one generation. That is the outcome if you follow through logically with your argumentation. That is what you vote for if you are not equivocal.
I'll try one more time for you and other apparently intellectually challenged that might be reading. Imagine two soldiers having identical training and quite similar in all other respects, twins if you like. One of them has been in combat, seen things, participated in things, to the fullest extent possible. Which one is more likely to take a position in many questions arising from the use of the military? Would the difference be absolutely objective since no amount of training on most sophisticated simulators in the world can match the actual experience?
Now, it might be that the one with combat experience still does not get it. The one without that experience might actually understand more than the first one. Is that possible? Quite. But you cannot deny the objective advantage of the former over the latter. Whether that gets applied or not is subject to particular individuals. And that is not what you call "superiority", it is an objective truth.
You can expand the example to anything at all - think doctors, pilots, etc. Would you pick one with actual experience over one without if you had a choice, just in case?
Well, russian_bot, talk to a few psychologists about your theory concerning the "differences" you imply but haven't the where withal to be out front about here when asked to be. But instead insinuate that if we don't have that what, "superior" ? knowledge of "the whole process", then the childless are "fundamentally challenged".Are you serious? Are the origins of all addictions and mental health problems derived from some demon force unrelated to disturbed and inadequate early childhood development? I.e. parenting?
"Are you serious?" - I am dead serious. And you are clueless. I suggest you drop it as you're incapable of allowing you're incapable. That's called hubris.
You've blocked me so you shouldn't be replying to me, as that's cowardly in a rather underhanded way. If you're a shitlib, though, then it's OK since it's the shitlib's way 😉🤣
If you're not a shitlib then can you put your inquiry together so it sounds anywhere near coherent? What is it you wanted to know?
How many less children would it take for Harris' "too many" to be removed from the sentence? When was enough...........enough? I.e., One.... five, ......... one hundred.........fifteen thousand.................. ????
If you are in the US Clearfield doctrine is critical;
Clearfield Doctrine
All courts where dissolved in 2008 under the clearfield doctrine then became registered companies on Dunn and Bradstreet company search. When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation U.S v Burr 309 U.S 22. See 22, U.S CA 286 e Bank of US v Planters Bank of Georgia 6L Ed (Wheat 244.) NOTE: Under the Clearfield Doctrine, the courts are no longer government entities in that they are demanding private monies and must have a contract with you to compel performance. They are no more special as a normal business than your local Jack In The Box. Clearfield Doctrine -“private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation” . Government create and enforce CIVIL LAWS known as statues, acts and legislation created by the Bar Association (set up by Rothschilds) which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency!
Governments Have Descended to the Level of Mere Private Corporations
Clearfield Doctrine Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363- 371 1942 Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance are made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. This case is very important because it is a 1942 case
Exhibit 8a
that was decided after the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY filed its "CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION" in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER the 'corporate government' agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use today. References: (i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-company.pdf (ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94) http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-great-american-adventurecomplete-work-by-judge-dale.pdf [4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist on paper. 5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do! 6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations? [8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
I believe it would indeed take a few years to be on top of the things you mention. ...Thanks for the effort, I appreciate it, although my ears are all I can give at the moment in order to know the laws of the land... My mind just wouldn't go there ... it just won't cooperate with what's good for it. On the other hand, one's person's freedom is another's prison. I've seldom broken laws, but often circumvented them if and when the occasions came along.
Although commendable when compared to authoritarian rulers, the U.S and Canada definitely have superior law courts and procedures,. I have tried however to avoid most confrontations with laws unless absolutely warranted. My father, mostly unwise to the ways of the world, was a gentle person who advised all within earshot that "There is no justice in this world". I pretty much follow that rule of thumb.
Sadly, there are too many dumb people that may not be able to understand your article and its direct implications to our currently unfolding reality.
[Dumb person reading CJ article: Why is CJ talking about hyenas eating children? What does this have to do with anything? Let's go back to talking about US Politics and Gaza.]
I may be exaggerating a little, but at times I feel frustrated with people that just don't seem to understand why killing innocent children, women, and men is BAD and WRONG and IMMORAL and EVIL and...
chokaski don't disabuse yourself from the fact you are one of the shitlibs of the forum. No amount of brownnosing and gaslighting will ever change this fact.
My country, the United States of America, has been a Killing Machine since the Dulles brothers lured us into continuing the French colonialist war in Vietnam. Our GDP per person is over $90,000. But the average GDP per person in the dozen or so countries we've invaded is $5,000, with the lowest being $700 in Afghanistan. We've slaughtered millions of civilians, most of them living in shacks or huts.. Democrats I know personally, sad to say, are far more exercised by abortion then our slaughter of innocent children in poor countries. Equally sad are wealthy American Jews, secure in their condos and mansion, being the driving force for America's direct participation in the mass killing of women and children by their co-religionists in Israel. America is, war after war, losing its soul.
Have had a similar conversation every 4 years for the last 32 years. But what is most disturbing about Harris's comment is that it implies there is an acceptable number of "children eaten by hyenas".
This whole situation is beyond horrible. The world just standing by and just watching on the lines, while every day scores and hundreds of innocent citizens ; elderly, nursing babies are just blown into pieces. What more has to happen to get the attention of the leaders of civilized and mighty Democracies of the world to say in one voice, “Enough, it’s enough bloodshed, starvation and
Pain which can be tolerated for a life time”
Some one, who is some body has to blow his/her whistle loud and clear and stay, “Stop , just Stop”. Every body just throw down their sticks, stones, guns and rockets and Listen, just listen. Let’s end all the misery and start the healing. May be there will be a day, which will come sooner than later. Like majority of the people in the world, I will keep on hoping that such a day will come soon. Amen !
I like what you said, Ashok. The problem is that the people with the sticks, drones and bombs are sadistic demons who are deriving some crazy sick pleasure from the murderous rampage. Witness the hooting and hollering, TikToking and shameless parading. These people, their backers and supporters have lost their souls. Perhaps they aren’t even people anymore.
It all makes me sick to my stomach, AIPAC funds the demons who look the other way while thousands are blown to bits. One thing I know, they will all pay for what they've done and not done but in the end, the Light wins.
The demons opened the door and laid the groundwork for AIPAC. JFK sought to have Israeli lobbyists register as foreign agents, and since his death, the subject has not been up for discussion.
Blaming AIPAC is the sort of misdirection that American intelligence workers live to propagate. Don’t blame Kamala, it’s the rules of the game. Don’t blame the Supreme Court, it’s the Constitution. Don’t blame the founders, it’s the immoral Israelis.
Americans are hypnotized not rise from their comfy chairs. Their government has been hijacked and nobody noticed.
As usual Caitlin nails it. I'm saving this to send to friends and family who keep throwing the 'but trump' at me for supporting Jill Stein. Maybe this piece will show them how ridiculous they look to me. Thanks!
Good idea. They'll either get it or they'll disown you. Either way--you win.
Yvonne. They simply don't care about being ridiculous.
The press move on to something else the next day (more than often on purpose) and until I am told differently, I would be prepared to say that the greatest majority of people in the US still accept the press headlines as gospel and yet are unaware (or choose to be unaware) that the same press are more than capable of changing that headline around to suit the climate, their climate that is, the next day......for a reason. The CIA / FBI / Political manipulators / NYT / CNN / Fox / and on... and on... climate.
The people, or until recently what appeared to be the majority of people (from "surveys") supported the ramblings and ravings of a man called Trump. Nasty comments, his observations on other candidates. They were well reported and damned rude at times but the next day was another day with other subjects of interest and in true media fashion, off they went, all 24 hour old comments then forgotten. They know they will be more today. That's the priority. The media industry requires that to maintain what has now been accepted by most as media credibility.,(2024 style).
There was a time in the past when someone like Trump would not survive after some of the things he has said over time. But these days........
.....anything goes.
Yvonne I will gladly take the chance of another Trump presidency by voting for Stein. I am sick and tired of the lessor of two evils vote. Harris will be the dark skinned female baby killer. I can't stand watching the high fives, cash hauls, and giddy euphoria of Harris/Walz as if happy times are here again. We are financing the slaughter of an entire population. No amount of calls for restraint work anymore. Every dead Palestinian and Ukrainian is on the Ray Banned baby killer's head. Unforgivable. And Harris? Too soon to tell but I'd imagine that she will lay prostrate in front of Bibi. Nothing against Jews but she has a Jewish husband, Jewish Secretary of State, Jewish AG. Chances are they all defend Israel's right to defend itself (Translation: Kill anyone, anytime, anywhere). Every nation has that right but it's obvious that when our feckless politicians say that they mean it's Ok to commit wanton murder in the name of reelection. Abortion overseas? Perfectly acceptable and indeed advantageous as long as our bombs do the abortions. Not encouraging. Bad optics at least for Gaza. If I am wrong, then I will admit it and still vote for Stein. Last thought. Joe I see you are concerned about your legacy. Senator Credit Card, you are a baby killer. That's your legacy. Live with it. And quit blubbering about your dead son. I am a father too. I empathize with your pain. But as a father I do not have the power to kill millions of people for nothing. I know you loved your boy. So do the the parents of the babies killed by your bombs. So think about their pain and call off your attack dogs by suspending all military aid until a permanent ceasefire is obtained.
The US has been financing the slaughter of many populations and millions of children for over 80 YEARS now. Palestine is just one more to add to the pile.
It’s time to create a better government whilst not creating even more graves.
That’s the challenge.
Arguing over which politicians to trust is futile.
Start the creation of the new system ; NOW. That will take much more than sharing thoughts, memes, and insults over social media platforms. We must do something concrete and real that takes time, sacrifice, discipline and patience: “getting off the couch” is easy: spending more time off of that couch takes real effort. Right now rescuing kids and families out of the Palestinian Holocaust is of immediate and paramount importance.
Then start DE constructing ALL of the systems that create and support such death camps. Again that will take time and sacrifice to accomplish: decades of it.
National strikes Patricia. That's the tonic.
That sounds like a decent strategy
Alice, Tweedledum and Tweedledee all engage in a moral discussion about the poem after it has been recited. Alice springs upon its most obvious and simple moral conclusion by saying that she “like[s] the Walrus best” because “he was a little sorry for the oysters” (Carroll, pg.141). Tweedledee challenges this assertion by revealing that “he ate more than the Carpenter” (Carroll, pg.141). When this changes Alice’s mind, his brother points out that the Carpenter “ate as many as he could get” (Carroll, pg.141). They are then forced to come to the conclusion that both the Carpenter and the Walrus are “very unpleasant characters” (Carroll, pg.141).
If you are interested, I have a slightly darker interpretation of this process. https://open.substack.com/pub/emanuelprez/p/the-attempted-assassination-and-the-a20?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=wvp9w
Thank you for the link Emanuel.
It’s a salient and valid argument regarding the true ruling classes and the distractions set up to properly “educate” and “lead” the populace to distract them from The “Matrix” they has, in fact, been slowly feeding on, and consuming them alive.
Good efforts here.
Perfectly said, Emanuel.
oooh Kamala, you are sooooo compassionate. When will you be sending the next shipment of bombs and amunition to Israel?
Susan, you mean when will Kamala be sending the next batch of children to feed the hyenas while pretending to feel sorry about it?
Chang.... When has Harris or Biden or Trump ever said the word 'children' ?
On another note.... don't children have the right to defend themselves too ?
drop it turcot
Dearest _bot,
On whose authority do you give such “commands” to drop (or pick up?).
Common sense dictates picking communication level matching people communicated to.
What politicians say, but continue to do the opposite is called lip service. Also the main stream media not only supports the hyenas, they actually blame the children and their parents for bothering the hyenas.
"Stop being so dang tasty, little children. The hyenas can't help themselves but gobble you up!"
Nizar Ibrahim
"What politicians say, but continue to do the opposite" is something I noticed when I was about 7 years old when the local priest announced that we should love one another..... been trying to figure that out ever since...but the evidence has been removed.
"Maybe we should be fighting the fact that powerful interest groups exert so much control over our electoral and governmental systems that they can force the advancement of extremely depraved agendas with no accountability to the electorate, instead of fighting over which child killer we should be electing to lower children into the hyena pit!”
Well said! Shut down the hyena pit forever! Lock up the hyena masters! Put Sally into a mental institution where hopefully her delusions about a "sad hyena master" will go away...
Much easier said:
Than done.
But a necessary outcome to the process of dismantling the Palestinian and Israeli Death Camps.
Nailed it! People rationalize away what they don't want to see as evil, and that's always easiest when the evil is inflicted on a "them". We humans are the greatest liars (rationalizers).
Indeed Avianthro,
Aren’t we?
Yes indeed Patricia, that old Billy Joel song about honesty being so hard to find sure was the truth, and it even applies, or shall we say that it most especially applies to honesty with ourselves too.
When your children are being bombed on a regular basis, any voice is better than none.
To have Kamala ship bombs to Israel and then acting like she's against it, is a slap in the face to all the children that have died.
I hope their ghosts haunt her forever.
Sociopaths have no conscience.
They won’t notice or care Darkstar.
Time to start starving the wolves and poison the hyenas.
k'mala doesn't have children, she can't relate. Many of current folks at power in the west are childless, some of them through perversion. That says a lot.
That's a false equivalence. I don't have children. That doesn't mean I support the murder of children.
Did I say all childless people support murder of children?
If you deny there's a difference between people who have children (their own, having gone through the whole process) and those who do not in respect to viewing the world, then you are fundamentally challenged.
Wow. That is a crazy "I am superior." position just because you have done the easiest thing in the world (procreate). I was a camp counsellor at a camp for terminally and chronically ill children for 3 summers, an au pair for an 8 month old baby for a year (they moved to a different state, wanted me to come with them, but I had to decline... But I am still in regular contact with that boy and his parents 26 years later and he says I am one of his favorite "uncles" even though he has no memory of when I took care of him.), and a daily (5 days a week) babysitter for two young boys for almost 3 years, so I know you are talking shit about how being a parent somehow elevates you into a moist cloud of compassion for all children. Typically, parents are hyper concerned only about their own kids. (the Israeli generals, soldiers, and politicians have children, as do most of the US politicians who invited, and applauded continuously, that Israeli genocidal baby-killer to speak before the senate) , AND I had a vasectomy at age 25 because I felt, and still feel 30+ years later, that 1.) the world is a crappy place to bring a new being into and 2.) if I really wanted to be a parent I could adopt one because the last thing this world needs is another narcissitic creation of yet another mouth (and anus).
"That is a crazy "I am superior." position" - where did I say that? Why did that particular notion - superiority - come to your mind? Look in the mirror and ask yourself.
"AND I had a vasectomy at age 25" - so you don't have children by choice and will be defending your decision to death - quite literally - because you have no other option. You will die and if everyone does what you did the humanity will die in one generation. That is the outcome if you follow through logically with your argumentation. That is what you vote for if you are not equivocal.
I'll try one more time for you and other apparently intellectually challenged that might be reading. Imagine two soldiers having identical training and quite similar in all other respects, twins if you like. One of them has been in combat, seen things, participated in things, to the fullest extent possible. Which one is more likely to take a position in many questions arising from the use of the military? Would the difference be absolutely objective since no amount of training on most sophisticated simulators in the world can match the actual experience?
Now, it might be that the one with combat experience still does not get it. The one without that experience might actually understand more than the first one. Is that possible? Quite. But you cannot deny the objective advantage of the former over the latter. Whether that gets applied or not is subject to particular individuals. And that is not what you call "superiority", it is an objective truth.
You can expand the example to anything at all - think doctors, pilots, etc. Would you pick one with actual experience over one without if you had a choice, just in case?
Is it clearer now?
Well, russian_bot, talk to a few psychologists about your theory concerning the "differences" you imply but haven't the where withal to be out front about here when asked to be. But instead insinuate that if we don't have that what, "superior" ? knowledge of "the whole process", then the childless are "fundamentally challenged".Are you serious? Are the origins of all addictions and mental health problems derived from some demon force unrelated to disturbed and inadequate early childhood development? I.e. parenting?
"Are you serious?" - I am dead serious. And you are clueless. I suggest you drop it as you're incapable of allowing you're incapable. That's called hubris.
Good! You've nailed it!
Like what?
Ignore it, you might be one of them hence have no idea.
Thank you for imitation of an @MurdochMedia troll _bot.
Well done!
Do be sorted won’t you?
Enjoy your summer block party.
You've blocked me so you shouldn't be replying to me, as that's cowardly in a rather underhanded way. If you're a shitlib, though, then it's OK since it's the shitlib's way 😉🤣
If you're not a shitlib then can you put your inquiry together so it sounds anywhere near coherent? What is it you wanted to know?
"far too many"???
How many less children would it take for Harris' "too many" to be removed from the sentence? When was enough...........enough? I.e., One.... five, ......... one hundred.........fifteen thousand.................. ????
Want to stop war crimes?
Want to stop crimes against humanity?
Want to stop genocide?
Just stop paying for it.
Many more details here; https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/how-to-exit-the-matrix
"just stop paying for it".... ....MMMmmmm Nice thought, but easier said than done ????
You will need to commit to learning something new and amazing for at least 12 months and when you understand clearfield doctrine you will be free.
I'm all ears....
You will need to read my longer piece and look up all the references and start learning.
https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/how-to-exit-the-matrix
If you are in the US Clearfield doctrine is critical;
Clearfield Doctrine
All courts where dissolved in 2008 under the clearfield doctrine then became registered companies on Dunn and Bradstreet company search. When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation U.S v Burr 309 U.S 22. See 22, U.S CA 286 e Bank of US v Planters Bank of Georgia 6L Ed (Wheat 244.) NOTE: Under the Clearfield Doctrine, the courts are no longer government entities in that they are demanding private monies and must have a contract with you to compel performance. They are no more special as a normal business than your local Jack In The Box. Clearfield Doctrine -“private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation” . Government create and enforce CIVIL LAWS known as statues, acts and legislation created by the Bar Association (set up by Rothschilds) which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency!
Governments Have Descended to the Level of Mere Private Corporations
Clearfield Doctrine Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363- 371 1942 Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance are made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. This case is very important because it is a 1942 case
Exhibit 8a
that was decided after the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY filed its "CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION" in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER the 'corporate government' agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use today. References: (i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-company.pdf (ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94) http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-great-american-adventurecomplete-work-by-judge-dale.pdf [4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist on paper. 5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do! 6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations? [8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
Whew Robert.
I believe it would indeed take a few years to be on top of the things you mention. ...Thanks for the effort, I appreciate it, although my ears are all I can give at the moment in order to know the laws of the land... My mind just wouldn't go there ... it just won't cooperate with what's good for it. On the other hand, one's person's freedom is another's prison. I've seldom broken laws, but often circumvented them if and when the occasions came along.
Although commendable when compared to authoritarian rulers, the U.S and Canada definitely have superior law courts and procedures,. I have tried however to avoid most confrontations with laws unless absolutely warranted. My father, mostly unwise to the ways of the world, was a gentle person who advised all within earshot that "There is no justice in this world". I pretty much follow that rule of thumb.
Here turcot: https://rumble.com/v4vur4r-are-federal-taxes-voluntary.html
Give us feedback.
The obscenely rich are the problem. Corrupt government is only a symptom. You need to get rid of the rich assholes first.
We are all paying for genocide every time we pay tax. We are all the problem.
"every time we pay tax" - well, don't then.
Eat the Rich.
Too fatty and all that gnarly old gristle, yuk. I will leave that one up to you!
Bartleby The Scrivener, it ain't.
Brilliant Caitlin!!!
Sadly, there are too many dumb people that may not be able to understand your article and its direct implications to our currently unfolding reality.
[Dumb person reading CJ article: Why is CJ talking about hyenas eating children? What does this have to do with anything? Let's go back to talking about US Politics and Gaza.]
I may be exaggerating a little, but at times I feel frustrated with people that just don't seem to understand why killing innocent children, women, and men is BAD and WRONG and IMMORAL and EVIL and...
chokaski don't disabuse yourself from the fact you are one of the shitlibs of the forum. No amount of brownnosing and gaslighting will ever change this fact.
Do you subscribe to Caitlin's newsletter just so you can have a go at Chang, r_b?
Dx?,
You’ve encountered a very good AI gen _bot.
Not Dx, - Rx, Patricia.
Know thyself and you will receiveth.
You lack context, hence are confused.
Now THAT is a top allegory. A parallel for Australia - from a speech at Sunday’s Sydney pro-Palestine rally.
🇮🇱 Shocking footage of Palestinian prisoners being gang-raped by Israeli soldiers. An Israeli politician was:
1. Outraged someone filmed it, rather than
2. Outraged at the rape itself
🇦🇺 In Australia - civil society and our politicians watch the genocide unfold in Gaza. Time in Parliament is spent:
1. Debating and legislating against those protesting the genocide, rather than
2. Taking action against the genocide itself
Mirrored by the Australian media.
Albo and Murdoch holding the hyena pit open.
Notes from protest here and on the continued media suppression with some shocking examples: https://sleekitscotsman.substack.com/p/sydney-pro-palestine-rally-sun-11th
My country, the United States of America, has been a Killing Machine since the Dulles brothers lured us into continuing the French colonialist war in Vietnam. Our GDP per person is over $90,000. But the average GDP per person in the dozen or so countries we've invaded is $5,000, with the lowest being $700 in Afghanistan. We've slaughtered millions of civilians, most of them living in shacks or huts.. Democrats I know personally, sad to say, are far more exercised by abortion then our slaughter of innocent children in poor countries. Equally sad are wealthy American Jews, secure in their condos and mansion, being the driving force for America's direct participation in the mass killing of women and children by their co-religionists in Israel. America is, war after war, losing its soul.
Much longer than that Dulles brothers. Think back to the Native Americans and what we did in Japan with the atomic bombs.
Yep. Those atomic bombs predate Dulles brothers by a long shot.
And please don’t forget Korea, John. My first cousin was killed there before I was born.
Have had a similar conversation every 4 years for the last 32 years. But what is most disturbing about Harris's comment is that it implies there is an acceptable number of "children eaten by hyenas".
I will bet most people who support State-mandated associations have similar numbers
If politics is a shell game, we would be well advised to ignore the lips and watch the hands, closely.
This whole situation is beyond horrible. The world just standing by and just watching on the lines, while every day scores and hundreds of innocent citizens ; elderly, nursing babies are just blown into pieces. What more has to happen to get the attention of the leaders of civilized and mighty Democracies of the world to say in one voice, “Enough, it’s enough bloodshed, starvation and
Pain which can be tolerated for a life time”
Some one, who is some body has to blow his/her whistle loud and clear and stay, “Stop , just Stop”. Every body just throw down their sticks, stones, guns and rockets and Listen, just listen. Let’s end all the misery and start the healing. May be there will be a day, which will come sooner than later. Like majority of the people in the world, I will keep on hoping that such a day will come soon. Amen !
Those days usually only happen after all the combatants are either or both physically and psychologically spent.
I like what you said, Ashok. The problem is that the people with the sticks, drones and bombs are sadistic demons who are deriving some crazy sick pleasure from the murderous rampage. Witness the hooting and hollering, TikToking and shameless parading. These people, their backers and supporters have lost their souls. Perhaps they aren’t even people anymore.
Ashok:
I believe the saviors will be Iran/Russia.
It all makes me sick to my stomach, AIPAC funds the demons who look the other way while thousands are blown to bits. One thing I know, they will all pay for what they've done and not done but in the end, the Light wins.
The demons opened the door and laid the groundwork for AIPAC. JFK sought to have Israeli lobbyists register as foreign agents, and since his death, the subject has not been up for discussion.
Blaming AIPAC is the sort of misdirection that American intelligence workers live to propagate. Don’t blame Kamala, it’s the rules of the game. Don’t blame the Supreme Court, it’s the Constitution. Don’t blame the founders, it’s the immoral Israelis.
Americans are hypnotized not rise from their comfy chairs. Their government has been hijacked and nobody noticed.
The Hindus had to invent reincarnation because there is no justice in this life.
Please sign and share: https://change.org/outlawAIPAC