Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Yvonne Scott's avatar

As usual Caitlin nails it. I'm saving this to send to friends and family who keep throwing the 'but trump' at me for supporting Jill Stein. Maybe this piece will show them how ridiculous they look to me. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Emanuel Pastreich's avatar

Alice, Tweedledum and Tweedledee all engage in a moral discussion about the poem after it has been recited. Alice springs upon its most obvious and simple moral conclusion by saying that she “like[s] the Walrus best” because “he was a little sorry for the oysters” (Carroll, pg.141). Tweedledee challenges this assertion by revealing that “he ate more than the Carpenter” (Carroll, pg.141). When this changes Alice’s mind, his brother points out that the Carpenter “ate as many as he could get” (Carroll, pg.141). They are then forced to come to the conclusion that both the Carpenter and the Walrus are “very unpleasant characters” (Carroll, pg.141).

Expand full comment
165 more comments...

No posts