270 Comments
User's avatar
Vin LoPresti's avatar

The most revealing aspect of the reality of America in the last days of this endlessly absurd election circus is how the Obamas, panderers to Wall St. criminals, murderers of millions, emerge from their elevated mansions to chastise working class, non-college-educated men for not supporting the party that colossally screwed them. Hey jerkoffs, I have two Masters and a Doctorate — but having grown up working/lower-middle class, I’m siding with those deplorables, not with you lying oligarch millionaire scumbags. You two literati illustrate the maxim that education doesn’t mean caca compared with the power of brainwashing and ultimate ethics-purchasing by big money.

Expand full comment
Jodi Yaccino's avatar

The Obama’s are star-fuckers. Traitors of the working class and liars to their very cores.

Expand full comment
Jodi Yaccino's avatar

As are all of the corporate democrats. Republicans are just as bad and worse on many levels. We are so screwed.

Expand full comment
Landru's avatar

I love you, never been said better : )

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

I wonder how many people will vote for Democrats after Obama let banks steal their homes for pennies on the dollar?

I watched the most amazing transformation during Obama when all the anti Bush, anti war folks suddenly decided that yes indeed the war of terror must be won.

That’s the power of tribalism.

Expand full comment
Lesley H.'s avatar

That happened under Bush. 🙄

Expand full comment
Pamela Brown's avatar

Exactly. The whole spectacle is just so absolutely disgusting. One of the side effects of AIPAC's capture of our government is that we lost any real political horizon in favor of lesser than evilism. They are literally campaigning on not being as bad as Trump. They have nothing else to offer because they sold out left ideals.

Expand full comment
GenEarly's avatar

The democRats used to Love Trump, Kennedy and Reagan too

Perhaps something changed? Insanity like Men in Women's Sports? Like a Wide Open Border? Like VaXXXing children for Covid? Like castrating children into Trannies? WTFU !!!

Expand full comment
Patrick Powers's avatar

"the Obamas, panderers to Wall St. criminals, murderers of millions, emerge from their elevated mansions to chastise working class, non-college-educated men for not supporting the party that colossally screwed them. "

I saw Barak's ad lecturing the "bros" about how they had to have racial solidarity, all in his phony attempt at bro-speak. It was obvious they weren't buying it at all. Note that the Ds couldn't even find a dozen bro fanboys. It was the most cringeworthy thing I have ever seen. I bet it didn't win a single vote. See for yourself here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVD17hg4O7o

Expand full comment
Vin LoPresti's avatar

I just donated to Jeremy Loffredo's SpotFund to help him replace his devices, which Israel has of course ruined with bugs, and to help him get out his documentary on ultra-Zionist south Bronx congressman Richie Torres (speaking of scumbags).

Here's a link: http://spot.fund/4gjmhbdc

Expand full comment
Landru's avatar

In reading your comment, I thought will they all explode at some point?

I watched the GrayZone when they announced the fund, I walk with you.

Expand full comment
Vin LoPresti's avatar

Only the Israeli maniacs know for sure. Thanks for donating. The GrayZone does such essential work revealing the hypocrisy of US foreign policy and its many hypocrites. And with Torres, it's a special breed of hypocrite: the guy represents the poorest congressional district in the country (or one of the poorest), and he sucks up AIPAC $$ like a champ (uh chump).

Expand full comment
Brian L's avatar

Tbf, Trump isn’t any different. We saw that from his first term. If you’re not a anting the system to be burnt to the ground, then you’re not really alleviating for any real relief to the workers. People who are willing to be slaves to this system will be slaves. But do t pretend you’re taking some sort of righteous stance by voting. Voting is a sham. There’s no power in it. It’s not revolutionary. You’re not changing any system. You’re placating your own feelings and that is all you’re doing.

Expand full comment
Vin LoPresti's avatar

So how's that bear on my original comment? I'm not advocating for Trump by shitting on the Obamas. Of course, the entire US political system is as corrupt as hell, and as Margaret Kimberley has pointed out, that fact is especially evident during presidential elections. I agree that voting changes nothing. And I recognize that as you say, my vote for Jill Stein was solely to placate myself (well said!) But if you're going to be completely honest what needs to be torn down is this fucking economic system that encourages -- fuck no, mandates --- nonstop consumption, rendering us feudal serfs to Zionist billionaires. The revolution has to start by denying these fuckers their preferred method of enslaving us. So I start by not participating in this Christmas consumption bullshit -- for example. I buy NOTHING.

Expand full comment
Brian L's avatar

That’s fair. And I agree, but we can only opt out for so long. And in any event, our totalitarian overlords have bigger plans for us aside from the old usual. But people are either going to break their chains or submit to them. There is little in between anymore.

Expand full comment
embarrassingly parallel's avatar

Jill Stein deserves to be recognized. She’s on the ballot and last posted pro Palestine… 5 hours ago.

Maybe she’ll only get 1% of popular but will get some interviews. Worth my vote I think? A bigger message than not voting.

Expand full comment
The Revolution Continues's avatar

Vote for Jill Stein. It sends a message to others that you're serious about wanting "People, Planet and Peace." And it will piss off the oligarchs. Pissing them off should be our main goal at this point. Keeps them off-balance. This will help us in the long run, IMO.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 2
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Landru's avatar

Or do nothing, I will vote Jill Stein with a big F U to the system.

Expand full comment
Gavin Farrell's avatar

Oligarchs need the duopoly to win to maintain their 'legitimacy.' If a Green or Socialist starts getting millions of votes, things might start to happen different from the usual.

Expand full comment
embarrassingly parallel's avatar

“Losing them actual money” would be good. It’s what they deserve and it might make a difference? I wish one of the billionaires would take an active position against campaign financing (it’s clearly not Elon or Bill Gates. )

Expand full comment
Dawn Reel's avatar

If Jill Stein gets more votes in Michigan than Kamala then everyone can say "the Democrats lost the election because of their support for genocide in Palestine."

Expand full comment
Patrick Powers's avatar

As you likely know, all Stein has to do for that is get more than the margin of victory of the Rs. This seems very possible.

Thus a vote for Stein is potentially much more effective than lesser evil voting.

Expand full comment
Patrick Powers's avatar

Voting for Jill is better than nothing and it's not that hard to do, so why not.

Expand full comment
Alistair P-M's avatar

Exactly. Makes me sick hearing Americans (and Brits, and lots of others) go on about the *Importance of Democracy* and then chastise anyone who entertains voting for someone other than the uniparty

Expand full comment
Landru's avatar

@5% Jill Stein would get the Green Party on to unchallenged ballots in 50 states and Federal matching funds. For me it's a big F U to the system that even though I voted did NOT earn my vote. So writing in Jill Stein and giving the finger to the system. Free Palestine : )

Expand full comment
Robert H Stiver's avatar

But Stein termed Presidents Putin and Al-Assad "war criminals." Google "Open Letter" 9-25 from the Syria Support Movement. Stein has not responded to my several reaches out to her for explanation of her treachery. I cannot overlook that.

Expand full comment
Dawn Reel's avatar

Jill Stein is responsible to her party. Party members can be educated. Hearing from Syrian Christians would undoubtedly be a big eye-opener.

Expand full comment
Landru's avatar

Or wait for someone you agree with 100% , good luck with that. I doubt you agree with all your family members. I don't.

Expand full comment
Robert H Stiver's avatar

Or go "blank POTUS ballot," which I did today, 11-02. A pox on all of 'em.

You're right on, of course, about family members. Such is the breakdown of US society, morals....

Expand full comment
David 1260's avatar

I agree. I feel good about this protest vote.

I just listened to the Duran's interview of Robert Barnes. He had a lot of hopeful things to say about what a Trump administration, with Bobby Kennedy, Tulsi Gabbard and possibly Col. MacGregor would be like. Worth listening to:

https://theduran.com/high-stakes-us-elections-2024-w-robert-barnes-live/

Expand full comment
Patrick Powers's avatar

That's nice, and it's possible. I'll believe it when I see it.

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

"A bigger message than not voting." - sure. A bigger in the sense you're saying "I believe in the system by having registered and casted my ballot". They're thankful for your providing the numbers and recognizing the system.

Expand full comment
Major Depressive 🎢's avatar

At least "they" know a voter came to the pills who was opposed to red and blue. And they'll hate Jill Stein for getting any votes especially of it's enough to potentially have swayed the result. You can watch "them" choke on their vitriol. But low turnout could be a stronger statement, if you believe enough others will do likewise. You can always get a bumper article that says, "Don't Blame Me. I Didn't Vote." or "I voted for the other humanoid life form which lost".

Expand full comment
Major Depressive 🎢's avatar

When I said Pills I meant The Battle Box.

Expand full comment
Antiwar7's avatar

Voting for third parties does make them nervous.

Anything to causes the powers that be to feel any stress is good.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

While true, they GENUINELY don't care whether you vote or not. If Killary "won" on a turnout of 5%, you think she would say "Gee, that's not a real mandate, I'd better turn down the Presidency and devote the Foundation to building social housing for free!"?

Or would she strut as though it was a 99% margin win in a 90% turnout?

Heads they win, tails you lose.

If there's someone local worth supporting, then go out and vote for them. Otherwise, it's whether you have anything better to do.

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

"they GENUINELY don't care whether you vote or not" - they do appreciate your chipping in as to the legitimacy of the process.

As more and more people abstained they've been inventing methods to make up the number. Hence mail-in voting in lots of places, some exclusively. With the increased opportunity for fraud as a tasty icing on the cake.

If you vote you legitimize the system. There's no way around it.

Expand full comment
Dawn Reel's avatar

Not if you live in the South. Voting is still important when it is taken away from the most oppressed. And why can't a huge number of Black folks vote? Why can't most folks in prison? Look at Reconstruction and the changes Black-majority parties brought and you'll see why they invented and kept funding the KKK.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

You're assuming they care if the political system is legitimate. Critique that thought. ;)

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

They don’t. But they appreciate voters do.

Expand full comment
Major Depressive 🎢's avatar

I was actually for your position. Before I was against it.

Expand full comment
Landru's avatar

Or do nothing. I will vote Jill while giving the system the middle finger and smile.

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

No, it's the system that will smile with appreciation of your contribution to its legitimacy.

Expand full comment
Res Nullius's avatar

I don't think the oligarchs care how people vote, as long as the whole exercise continues to function as a distraction. So let's not bother with what they think - let's consider instead what's going on in the head of the voter. We could see a vote for a third party as a step on the path to realising that we don't have a democracy and we never did.

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

"We could see a vote for a third party as a step on the path to realising that we don't have a democracy and we never did." - sounds weird. How is voting not believing in democracy? And voting for a non-third party - believing in it?

Expand full comment
Res Nullius's avatar

You're missing my point. Your description of my words is a misrepresentation. I'm asking you to consider how a person might transition from believing that democracy exists to realising that their vote has no effect and therefore some other kind of action is needed. I said only that it could be a step on the path. If large numbers of people vote for a third party and then see that it's ineffectual, it will might help them to realise that there is no voting our way out of this mess.

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

"Your description of my words is a misrepresentation." - my questions were not based on your statement?

If you are so touchy then formulate your thesis more carefully so it cannot be subjected to scrutiny and you won't have to jump to conclusions regarding my intentions.

Your clarification makes it clearer even though to me it suggests the voters are quite slow in their self-education. Maybe that's been the case all along and the time it takes voters to realize it is sufficiently long for any changes to take effect. They simply die while the younger generation repeats the drill.

Expand full comment
Lesley H.'s avatar

She’s a Putin sympathizer and her point is simply to drain off democrats. She’s never been anything but a fool and a fraud

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

The only people who "drain off democrats" is the Demonrat Party. Imagine what all those voters COULD achieve if they had the balls to think outside the box, and weren't throwing their money at genocidal Imperialists and warmongers.

Stein doesn't hate Ukrainians like those who "support" the war there, and keep it going. I cannot think of a more hateful thing than to force a defeated people to keep on fighting and dying - currently around 2000 young men, and a growing number of young women, EVERY DAY.

Frankly, a "Cheney-sympathiser", or a "Lindsey Graham-sympathiser", or a "John-Bolton-sympathiser", is magnitudes worse than anything to do with Putin.

Expand full comment
Antiwar7's avatar

You're wrong.

By the way, as soon as you wrote "Putin sympathizer", you revealed you're a brainwashed fool. As if anyone in America decides what to think because of Putin.

Expand full comment
Patrick Powers's avatar

Lesley, have you ever considered that all those pundits on TV are lying to you every day? That they do this to progress their careers? That said lying is coordinated by those who employ them?

Expand full comment
gypsy33's avatar

Lesley, GTFOH.

Expand full comment
Landru's avatar

Like, Genocide Biden, Harris, and Trump. Voting Jill Stein and the big FU to the system.

Expand full comment
embarrassingly parallel's avatar

Yes, her purpose is to drain off votes. But many of the younger Maga voters seem more libertarian than Republican - I think they could switch. The Nick Fuentes crew are examples. They think Trump is in Israel’s pocket. They’re not all white, not all male, and not all racist. So, she’s not only up against Dems.

Expand full comment
embarrassingly parallel's avatar

Jill got my vote. Need to start hugging some trees! 😀 Thanks to those who helped me decide 🙏

Expand full comment
Kevin Pettitt's avatar

We here in the UK had the opportunity to change the way that our country was governed in 2017.

Jeremy Corbyn was leading the Labour Party and there was genuine excitement about the prospect of meaningful change.

But as I am sure you know the political establishment closed ranks and with the willing assistance of the client media was denied the chance of becoming Prime Minister.

Had we been successful we could possibly have been living in a quiet different world today.

But,successful or not, in the words of the great Chris Hedges “I don’t fight fascists because I expect to win. I fight them because they are fascists.”

Keep the faith sister.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Remember how Obama got people's hopes up? Were a Corbyn to get elected, he would quickly be neutered.

The Iron Law Of Oligarchy always wins in the end.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Obomber got people's hopes up by lying, or 'lawyerly semi-truths'.

Corbyn got people's hopes up by being honest, and committing to authentic change to change their lives for the better.

Obomber was never "neutered", he was what he is from Day 1.

Corbyn could never have been neutered, but highly likely to be assassinated.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/british-army-could-stage-mutiny-under-corbyn-says-senior-serving-general-10509742.html

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-48868071

Expand full comment
Ron Stockton's avatar

Corbyn also had a movement of tens of thousands of people (most young) supporting him so, were there not a neoliberal 5th column in the Labour Party, Corbyn would have won and likely would have made significant change - if he wasn’t assassinated.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Obama had a huge movement behind him. Didn't matter.

Corbyn didn’t purge Blairites when he had the chance..Corbyn is not nasty enough to get power or keep it for long.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Ever seen "Yes, Minister"?

FWIW, I suspect without any evidence that something similar happened to Ohama.

Expand full comment
GenEarly's avatar

Obama was a Groomed Commie by his mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, who probably was his real daddy too

Expand full comment
Landru's avatar

Wow, Obummer was and is a Fascist like all the ruling parties. Obummer is 180 degrees from a Communist. Just one thing for working people would have been nice.

Expand full comment
Edward Bernaysauce's avatar

we are still in the midst of the 'Hopium Wars'- as well as others...

Expand full comment
Landru's avatar

Obummer, as with the traitor Bernie, my greatest failures of hope. I stand with you my friend : )

Expand full comment
John Mann's avatar

I have never been a Corbyn fan.

But it seems to me that there is one big difference between Corbyn and Obama. Corbyn had a consistent political track record going back to the 1980s. Hardly anyone had heard of Obama five years before he became president. He had, essentially, no track record.

I don't know what Corbyn would have been like as prime minister, but I do know that he would not have been much like Obama.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Interesting point. Corbyn's problem wasn't his track record. It was his lack of ruthlessness.

Expand full comment
John Mann's avatar

Which is a good sort of problem for a politician to have!

But I always thought that it was weird that when all the nonsense was being talked about the Labour Party having an anti-semitism problem, Corbyn didn't push back much.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

The problem is that politicians who lack ruthlessness, who fail to recognize that This Is Hardball, get pushed around.

Expand full comment
John Mann's avatar

Which is why it is interesting that Corbyn actually managed to rise to be leader of the Labour Party.

Expand full comment
The Revolution Continues's avatar

Amen! Fight the fascists. Always!

Expand full comment
GenEarly's avatar

Name some please, Conrade

Expand full comment
Landru's avatar

Harris, Biden, Graham, Trump, Mush, and many, many more.

Expand full comment
Brian L's avatar

Correct

Expand full comment
John Turcot's avatar

Kevin,

"Had Corbyn been successful we could possibly have been living in a quite different world today".

Nope! the world would be the same,, and human stupidity would have endured. No one person can 'Save the World' only God can, and since I'm not convinced God gives a damn, I think we're on our own.... We were born in a paradise of living creatures, but according to the latest info from the ecologist crowd, perhaps as much as 70% of the Earth's biosphere has been lost in the last 30 years....... Jeremy Corbin probably had as much chance in saving anything that matters as I would have in trying to swim across the Atlantic.

Expand full comment
Jack Horner's avatar

Way to try and disempower people...

'Only my Sky Pixie can do anything and it won't, so lay down and die...'

Nonsense. Your belief is an opiate, administered generations ago. Get clean and if having a god gives you the feelies, keep it by all means, but stop doing the devil's work with it.

Expand full comment
Peter Sawchuk's avatar

Do you honestly think 70% of the biosphere has been destroyed? In the last 30 years? It's just more bullshit promoted by useful idiots to create apathy. climate change, extinction and massive changes to the biosphere have been ongoing for four billion years. The planet is still here as are the diverse lifeforms on it.

Expand full comment
Jack Horner's avatar

Peter, this simply isn't how meaningful thinking works...

Your comments above are not worth the effort of typing them out, they are so thoroughly flawed. Sorry bud.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Yes, all this has happened before and people have been murdered before doesn't mean they're not being murdered now.

Climate crisis, species extinction and loss of pollinators due to human activity is accelerating and lots of money is being spent on making people like you think that it's bullshit. Our controllers in Big Oil etc are not amateurs.

Expand full comment
Peter Sawchuk's avatar

Maybe you and Jack are the deluded ones. Check out the oil spill from the Exon Valdez. Sea life is flourishing on top of the pockets of spilled crude. Do you think this could possibly indicate you are being lied to for some ulterior purpose? While i do agree a lot of places are poisoning things but if you think that the powers that be give shit you are sadly deluded. They only want it all for themselves and will use any and all methods to distract from what is really going on. If oil stopped tomorrow you would probably be living in the dark while you freeze or starve to death. Funny thing is people like me would survive.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

🤡🤡

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

🤡🤡🤡

There! Outclowned you both.

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

And the human-caused global warming cult brigade is descending on you without missing a beat.

Funny how the shitlib type seems to have gotten the USA/West/Israel game but keeps missing the same bullshit being fed them by those same people using those same tricks. Not just human-caused global warming tale (quietly changed to "climate change"). BLM, etc. - all the distraction "causes" for the gullible to swallow and keep the division alive.

Expand full comment
John Turcot's avatar

Peter,

"Do you honestly think 70% of the biosphere has been destroyed?"

( don't think, I just assume that the sciences are correct. Here's a report from the WWf, and I quote: ... "Wildlife populations - mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles and fish - have seen a devastating 69% drop on average since 1970, according to WWF’s Living Planet Report (LPR) 2022."...

You can always forward your question (Do you honestly think).... ) to them.........

Expand full comment
Peter Sawchuk's avatar

Rule of thumb. When you assume you make an ass out of you and me.

Expand full comment
John Turcot's avatar

Peter,

"Rule of thumb. When you assume you make an ass out of you and me."... Not a "Rule of thumb", but a rule of physics. As far as I know, an ass is part of the human anatomy, so what use is there to make a second ass when we already carry that anatomical burden?

Expand full comment
Peter Sawchuk's avatar

Yeah. Trust the science. Enjoy your Kool Aid.

Expand full comment
John Turcot's avatar

Peter,

"Yeah. Trust the science. Enjoy your Kool Aid. "... MMmmmmmm???? Aren't you trusting computer SCIENCE to send along your love songs? i.e., how does your electronic "Kool Aid" taste?

Expand full comment
GenEarly's avatar

Farage ???

Expand full comment
Kevin Pettitt's avatar

Mr Farage is exactly what he has always been. A shameless,self publicist and con merchant. He has a single cause that he is utterly devoted to and that is the accumulation of as much cash and attention as he can get.

It is undeniable that he has the gift of the gab which was extremely effective in scaring David Cameron’s Tory Party into holding the disastrous European Union membership referendum but like a lot of loud noise makers he is essentially an empty vessel.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Well said Kevin Pettitt

Expand full comment
Susan T's avatar

I think that many many people DO understand that we are being lied to by politicians, by the media, by anyone with any power. I don't think people are as dim as some in these comments think. But people just do not know what to do. They have children who may have problems; they have older relatives who are sick and dying. People are scared and when people are scared they find some way to escape. Netflix, pot, booze. People have not ever been taught how to deal with the kind of adversity that we are presently facing in the world. It is not helping anything at all to blame or ridicule regular people. I keep talking, keep losing friends, keep feeling depressed about all that is happening. I think about the people of Gaza and I feel overwhelmed with sadness and regret. I KNOW that there is not one single person to vote for who will change anything. I have often not bothered to vote, but I am not sure that really does much good either. I don't think it helps any of us to blame each other. We need to find other people who want change and TRY. And we also need to accept that anything we do try may not work because we are against a few people who have stolen all the power for themselves and they keep that power because of the way they have set things up. But we still need to fight that power in any way we can.

Expand full comment
The Revolution Continues's avatar

Keep fighting, Susan! We hear you. Sometimes voting and joining a group that's working against the corrupt system are ways to make new friends that keep you fighting and keep your spirits up.

Expand full comment
Darkstar's avatar

Never give up Susan !

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

The only way might be to play their game. Infiltrate and change it from within

Expand full comment
Susan T's avatar

That has never worked and it never will. We need another system and it will not be changed from "within". When people decide to join the system in order to change it from within they get twisted up themselves because they are spending a lot of time with people who see wealth and power as success.

Expand full comment
Amelia Anderson's avatar

Crushing three orphans with the orphan-crushing machine instead of five orphans does not make you a better person and there is nothing to prevent the next person from crushing seven to make up for the losses.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Thank you Caitlin for your honesty and clear-sightedness.

Here is another perspective on the 2024 election (which meshes with yours nicely) ->

Critical Election Theory (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M9vvZq2DHs)

May the chips fall where they will. The fact that the US has the worst Presidential candidates possible (Donald Trump and Kamala Harris) speaks about the deplorable and hopeless state of the US. Maybe it's a sign of the coming demise of the US Empire...and the hope that things will get better after that...

Expand full comment
@smokygirl2006's avatar

If Jill Stein is not on my ballot I won’t vote at all for president. I can’t bring myself to vote for either of these two politicians or to quote Judge Napolitano’s written piece where he talks about the election, “tweedle de and tweedle dumb”because of their pro-Israel bs. I refuse to vote for ANYONE who endorses the mass murder of civilians, especially women and children and the elderly. I was talking to someone the other day in the urology center while waiting for my Dad and told her about Gaza and that I refuse to watch msm because they won’t tell the truth about what’s happening to the Palestinians. She seemed real nice, but I don’t believe she really knew what I was talking about. This is because the mainstream media refuses to tell the truth about how Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians and why a lot of Americans really don’t know what is happening over there. It’s disgusting.😢☮️🇵🇸

Expand full comment
The Revolution Continues's avatar

"No matter how you vote, the ever-expanding abuses of capitalism and plutocracy will continue making life worse for ordinary Americans."

Perhaps, but like you say if voting gives us all a "feeling" then let's make it one that will generate the most emotion and action from the largest portion of the population. Let's make it so damn obvious that we're being screwed that it drives the people out of their homes and into the streets and into the places of power. Let's make it a feeling that brings on the Revolution and takes down the oligarchy once and for all. I think the best way to do so in the US is by voting for alternative candidates, exposing the corrupt electoral system. That will wake up a lot of Americans. Let's do it!

Expand full comment
Jack Horner's avatar

And don't be scared of voting for delayed gratification... vote minor party to encourage others to next time. Vote against the duopoly that US propaganda convinces you all (even Cailin in this article) is unquestionably inevitable.

Expand full comment
Darkstar's avatar

HI TRC this .ay seem gloomy, but it's real nonetheless.

I have found that winning requires many things, including creativity.

Please let me know what you think of this.

https://youtu.be/pHe7mDRURfA?si=Ls9ni1S1mvzLZlbK

Expand full comment
MARYELLEN KERSCH's avatar

Sad, but true; I voted for Cornell West for president because his soul is pure and his record solid. So I feel good about supporting him. The alternatives made me sick to my stomach.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Cornel West was my #1 pick too. Unfortunately, he's not politically savvy enough (and that's a good thing) to win in the completely corrupt state of US politics.

Expand full comment
Jodi Yaccino's avatar

West didn’t make it onto the ballot here in NM, and no write in for him is allowed. I am not voting at all. It’s meaningless theater anyway. We need to overthrow the Oligarchs and change our entire system of governance. That’s the only way out of this. It’s going to get a whole lot worse before that happens. I will be dead by then. Good luck to the rest of you.

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar
Nov 2Edited

Didn’t he just come out and endorse Kamala? Pretty sure I read that recently.

He couldn’t endorse Stein because he’s afraid of another Trump term. I wish people would realize that they lived through his first term.

Expand full comment
MARYELLEN KERSCH's avatar

Saw a recent interview this past week w. Chris Hedges and he sure didn't endorse either of the corporate candidates. He has been outspokenly critical of her, stating he could not vote for her due to her history as a "top cop" prosecutor. Pretty sure he's not changed his mind. Also seems like it would have made national media if he were to switch that position; it's just not like him to sell out. BTW, pretty sure Trump II would be disastrously worse than the one where he had no idea where the levers of power were hidden.

Expand full comment
martin's avatar

but will trump2 be worse enough to get people out in the streets?

Expand full comment
Obsolete Optics's avatar

It's a humiliation ritual for slaves.

Expand full comment
Obsolete Optics's avatar

Why Don't I Vote? I'll Let George Carlin Explain It To You

https://youtu.be/9X4Z1lLUMfw?si=a4JVAtPHl8GABdzq

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Humans want to be abused and lied to.

*sigh* For most people most of the time, the fastest and surest way to wind up dead or seriously disadvantaged has been at the hands of our fellow humans. At the same time, "our group", whether by faith, family, tribe, regiment, whatever, are the people we can trust to have our back.

Therefore, whatever else happens, whatever we have to do, believe absurdities, blindly follow barking insane leaders, parrot obvious lies to our detriment, do or suffer terrible things, but please whatever you do, please don't kick us out of the group!

Those who have lived in the Third World and in developed countries should have a light come on about now.

What this also means is that when we are presented with incontrovertible proof that the group narrative is wrong or that the group leaders are mad or charlatans or worse, rather than change leaders or change beliefs or change groups, most people, most of the time will instead double down. Witness the behavior of cultists.

The process is called "cognitive dissonance" and it is abundantly documented. As alluded to earlier, there are entire religions organized around the principle.

Cognitive dissonance is not limited to stupid people. In fact, the intelligent are at least as prone, perhaps because they are better at rationalizing. In fact, much so-called "knowledge work" is basically learning symbol manipulation in order to rationalize something.

Expand full comment
Patrick Powers's avatar

https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/what-know-cognitive-dissonance

"Cognitive dissonance is a psychological term that describes the discomfort you feel when your beliefs don’t line up with your actions. Or it could refer to the tension of holding two conflicting beliefs at once. “Cognitive” means relating to your thoughts. “Dissonance” describes a lack of harmony. Your thoughts – on the one hand, that you consider yourself a staunch supporter of a certain political party and, on the other hand, that you cannot support that party’s policy about your neighborhood – are not in harmony with each other. The discomfort this causes can push you to make a change, either in your behavior or your beliefs, that will make you feel more comfortable."

This is why authoritarian systems will force their subjects do certain things. People who lived through it said that forcing everyone to say Heil Hitler as a greeting and to give the Nazi salute was very effective at changing beliefs to the benefit of the Nazis. Soldiers march. Subjects prostrate themselves before the king or sultan.

However like so many things no one owns the definition of cognitive dissonance, and the definition given above is seldom used so it is useless in casual discussion. I avoid using such words and instead stick with specific issues.

Expand full comment
Truth Seeking Missile's avatar

Say it Caitlin: JUST DON'T VOTE. Voting in American gives the supporters of genocide, hate, and other human perversions that ability to say "Americans gave me a mandate." So stop giving them your permission. Do not vote for a presidential candidate on Tuesday.

Expand full comment
Selina Sweet's avatar

An alternative view - Not voting elicits a Big Thank God croaked out by corporate, Wall Street and Big Money....no votes means less hassle for them.....As Wollin writes about Inverted Totalitarianism, one of its biggest characteristics is citizen lethargy...hopelessness married to powerlessness.....means a silent citizenry

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

As Selina Sweet said.

Also, if you REALLY want to piss them off, put yourself on the ballot instead of walking away. You never know what might happen - and nor do they. That is their worst nightmare.

Expand full comment
martin's avatar

and as you mentioned elsewhere, they'll be claiming a mandate no matter the turnout. reps and dems have their solid voter base that will always turn out to give them a 'mandate'. from a certain perspective the last few election cycles have only been about maintaining the duopoly and keeping the other people's voice out. especially the reps have been very busy herding 'moderates' to the dems keeping them away from alternatives, imo (i'm biased from the left, maybe there's a same perspective from the right).

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Yeps x10.

"especially the reps have been very busy herding 'moderates' to the dems keeping them away from alternatives"

THIS ^^^. :Thumbsup:

Expand full comment
Sam's avatar

Whenever I watch people at political rallies going ape shit gaga over what the candidates say I want to ask them if they really believe that person gives 2 rats asses about them. We’ve been voting for the same people in congress for 50 years and each year our living standards have gone down. Pelosi, Schumer, McConnell et al and even though they kept promising things they’d do for us they never did. How can people be so blinded by this fact?

Biden said he’d end the forever wars and instead he’s gotten us involved in Ukraine and gawd only knows what countries in the south.

People think that Trump was anti war, but more civilians died during his tenure than during Obama’s. He’s threatening to send Iran back to the Stone Age, but his supporters still think he’s anti war.

And for all the women voting for the right to their bodies how is it that they don’t remember that democrats have been running on codifying abortion rights for over 50 years? And that when Obama could have done it he said it wasn’t a priority for him.

Yeah, Caitlin you said it best when you said voting is like driving with a plastic steering wheel. People who believe that voting will change anything are just beyond comprehension.

Expand full comment
Darkstar's avatar

Voting will never change anything. We do have many good reasons to be concerned about next week.

Expand full comment
Sim1776's avatar

Either way, the War Party wins. Plan accordingly...

Expand full comment
Barrie Machin's avatar

The Empire will collapse because the debt is insurmountable

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Wrong! The debt is part of the system that keeps the empire going - it is the tool that is used to suppress/oppress nations and populations. Also, you may have heard of debt slavery. Debt is a tool used by neo-colonialists (and not just the US).

Expand full comment
Indu Abeysekara's avatar

Chang, Right! This is what Susan George - and many other political scientists after her - has written about. Her books " A Fate Worse than Debt" , "How the Other Half dies" are seminal works.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

That is also true, so in that sense it doesn't matter who gets in. The Empire is going down anyway. Long life unregulated economic zones! (until the climate crisis gets everyone).

Expand full comment
Ron Harold's avatar

Poor Caitlin bless her heart. Dear Caitlin, US foreign policy is never on the ballot, however domestic policy is on the ballot and it does make a difference and that's why I tell people you should vote Democrat because Democrats have much much much much much better domestic policies than Republicans. You're not going to change US foreign policy by voting for Democrats or Republicans. We need a new party and a new party president to change US foreign policy. A woman's right to choose is on the ballot along with other really meaningful important domestic issues that will actually cause millions of Americans great harm if Republicans win and that is an objective fact. I'm building a new party yet I am going to vote Democrat on November 5th to stop Trump and MAGA from implementing Republican policy that will literally kill women and harm a lot of people. I need to say this again: Caitlin, US foreign policy is never ever on the ballot and will never be on the ballot as long as Democrats and Republicans are in charge of Congress and the White House.

Expand full comment
MARYELLEN KERSCH's avatar

Well, if the DNC hadn't cooked up Biden's steal of the nomination 4 years ago, Dems might well have picked the far-and-away front-runner Bernie Sanders and THAT would have been a huge difference. So I blame this entire mess on the corporate Dems, and they richly deserve it. And they are likely to lose this time. May they rest in peace. (I voted for Cornell West this time because he is authentic and proven.)

Expand full comment
Lesley H.'s avatar

People who think Bernie could have done even 1 single thing he promised have not learned how our government works. 1) Bernie had passed in his entire career exactly 1 bill, changing the name of a post office. 2) why? Because Bernie has never been able to actually get consensus because he’s a curmudgeon and won’t compromise; as a figurehead - the president- he can’t do anything outside of executive orders so must rely on the consensus of the Dem party to pursue his leg goals. FAT CHANCE of that ever happening so all he was doing was shouting populism we all know is right but that few Americans are ready for, most of all, the politicians and the billionaires who bought them.

Expand full comment
Lesley H.'s avatar

Also, how do you come up with “steal”? Literally no one expected him to win the primary! 😄

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

So you think the party that let Roe be annulled for its own short-term electoral purposes (Having nothing else to run on except debunked russiagate and TDS), is that much better than the party that annulled Roe itself?

Do you wonder if you would fall for the good cop/bad cop routine?

Expand full comment
Lesley H.'s avatar

Russiagate was not debunked whatsoever. Did you bother to read the mueller report? And I love how you think anyone can overturn a scotus ruling. We can’t even do anything about their blatant corruption!

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

I know for a fact that you didn't read the report.

Expand full comment
MARYELLEN KERSCH's avatar

Obviously you did NOT (or, maybe, cannot) read what I posted. Give it another try.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

I could do that, or YOU could "Give it another try" instead. Look carefully - I *liked* your post, and was replying to Ron Harold - just as you did. Not to you.

Expand full comment
Lesley H.'s avatar

Do tell, how would the democrats overturn the SCOTUS’s ruling? And I do understand, you are married to an American and do not live in the states, so your equality is not under threat. But I would like to know what we were all supposed to do about SCOTUS’s ruling?

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

Well, lets assume the demonrats actually gave a shit, lets assume they CARED that poorer women were going to lose the choice, rather than it being a useful electoral tool. It's a long shot, and quite a fanciful notion, but for the sale of argument let's pretend.

One thing they could have done is shout it to the rafters, and mobilised the Public to demonstrate in every State. Rather than sitting on their hands twiddling their fingers during that entire month.

Another thing they could have done is threaten the SCOTUS that the POTUS will expand the SCOTUS until they had a pro-choice majority, unless the SCOTUS backed down on this not-yet-enacted policy. Instead of sitting on their hands twiddling their fingers during that entire month.

Everything the Demonrat Party did indicated to the conservative judges that they would do nothing, and indicated to the liberal judges they were out on a limb.

Of the two, the first would probably have had more impact, although the second would have been a iron hammer if the first failed.

The USA may be an oligarchical plutocracy, but they do like to PRETEND its a democracy, and having 100,000,000 Americans out in the streets demonstrating would have had a huge effect.

However, the policy change does not affect wealthier Americans, who could either go overseas for a treatment, or buy the necessary drugs under the table.

So the Demonrats fiddled, while Roe burned out.

Expand full comment
Ron Harold's avatar

Lesley, if Catholic anti-abortionist conservative jackass Joe Biden gave a shit about a woman's right to choose, Biden could have expanded the Supreme Court to a Democratic Party majority via Executive Action.......Biden don't want to do that cause he's a dickhead anti-abortionist who meets with the anti-abortionist Pope every year to high five him for NOT expanding the rogue, terrorist GOP Supreme Court to a Dem majority.

To answer your specific question as to how Democrats could overturn SCOTUS ruling, all that would require is for Biden or Harris to expand the Court to a Dem majority, THEN a plaintiff could file a legal challenge to ROE OVERTURNED AND CITIZENS UNITED - then the new Dem majority on the Court could grant cert to hear the case and rule for the Plaintiff and thus overturn CITIZENS UNITED AND RE-INSTATE ROE.....thus restoring a woman's right to choose AND getting BIG MONEY OUT OF FEDERAL ELECTIONS.

The truth is Democrats AND Republicans do not want to get BIG MONEY OUT OF U.S. ELECTIONS and do not wish to reinstate ROE.

Expand full comment
Lesley H.'s avatar

This is a perfect demonstration of the problem with Bernie fans: lack of understanding of how our government works. NO, POTUS can’t expand SCOTUS by exec order. It can only be done by Congress. In case you did not notice, Dems only had a majority by a hair. So many Dems were not going to vote to expand that Pelosi said she wasn’t bothering to even bring it to the floor as it would be voted down. In case you didn’t know; there were 2 false democrats who were responsible for sinking the voting rights bill: Joe manchin, and Kristen sinema (sp?) these senators were in fact republicans.

As for marching, you also must not have noticed the massive amount of marching going on all around the states tho the largest in DC. SCOTUS is the most powerful institution in the US, and they DGAF what we do. So, also, not a reason to blame the Dems for Roe. I can’t even believe anyone would even think of trying to blame Dems for the fall of roe it is so baseless! The Dems attempted to pass birth control protection AND roe protection but without the majority in congress, couldn’t pass it. Bills have to be voted on by a majority of people or they don’t pass. This is how legislation works, and btw why Bernie would have accomplished none of the things he wanted to.

Expand full comment
MARYELLEN KERSCH's avatar

You are far less wise than you imagine, Harold. Where in the world were you schooled?

Expand full comment
Ron Harold's avatar

I feel sorry for you.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 3
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Amelia Anderson's avatar

Dude, get off the internet for a week.

Expand full comment
Ron Harold's avatar

dumb bitch...shutup.

Expand full comment
Gnuneo's avatar

"PROGRESSIVES.SUBSTACK"!

Are you, like the Ukrainians, "Progressing backwards"?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Nov 3
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
MARYELLEN KERSCH's avatar

I'll pass on that, doofus!

Expand full comment