Tom Cotton Explains Why Warmongers Love The Wuhan Lab Leak Theory
Listen to a reading of this article:
At a recent appearance on Sunday Night in America with Trey Gowdy, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton took a break from masturbating to drone bombing footage to explain what it is he and his fellow psychopathic warmongers love so much about the hypothesis that Covid-19 originated in a Chinese laboratory.
"I think the American people deserve to know what caused the worst pandemic in a century," Cotton told the show's space alien host. "Look, China should be made to pay for their negligence and their deceitfulness at the outset of this pandemic: covering up its origins, not being open about what was happening in that lab in Wuhan."
"There's lots of things we could do to impose accountability on China," Cotton gushed. "We could for instance work their allies to ensure they're no longer getting sweetheart deals from international financial institutions like the World Bank. We could repeal the permanent most-favored nation status we foolishly gave China 20 years ago. We could cut off visas to Chinese Communist Party officials and their princeling kids who like to come to America to go to school."
"But if it turns out that the Chinese Communist Party and their labs were responsible for a lab leak that caused this pandemic, just imagine what the American people would demand in terms of accountability; what I said would just scratch the surface," the senator said. "And the American people would be right to demand that kind of accountability."
Cotton has been pushing for a "full, impartial investigation into COVID-19 origins, with a special focus on the Wuhan labs," and he knows full well that there is no mechanism in existence which could carry out such an impartial investigation. There is no reason to believe any investigation into the Wuhan lab would not be heavily biased toward a pro-US narrative and used to manufacture international agendas to smash China, and there is every reason to believe it would be.
Have you ever wondered why the people indicted and detained by the International Criminal Court are always from weaker nations—overwhelmingly African—while far more deadly war criminals like George W Bush and Tony Blair walk free? It's because "international law" only exists to the extent that there's an international willingness and ability to enforce it, and the US uses its military and economic might to keep the international community mostly aligned with it. If US allies ever contemplate charging America's military with war crimes, they are threatened that they'll wind up on the wrong side of US military protection. If ICC officials ever dare to cast their gaze upon the US government's behavior, Washington just laughs and sanctions them.
The US actively works to bribe, bully and manipulate international governments into protecting and advancing its interests. When the US was seeking UN authorization for the Gulf War in 1991, Yemen dared to vote against it, after which a member of the US delegation told Yemen's ambassador, "That's the most expensive vote you ever cast." Yemen lost not just 70 million dollars in US foreign aid but also a valuable labor contract with Saudi Arabia, and a million Yemeni immigrants were sent home by America's Gulf state allies.
Or take the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which began in 1997 as an independent international body working toward the elimination of chemical weapons from the world with great success. That all changed in 2002 when the OPCW Director General, José Bustani, became viewed by the Bush administration as an obstacle to the agenda to manufacture international support for the Iraq invasion. The US threatened to cut off funding for the organization, Undersecretary of State John Bolton threatened Bustani's kids, and Bustani was sent packing. Now the OPCW is a lackey of the US war machine whose leaders actively manipulate chemical weapons investigations to produce results which align with US imperialist interests.
Hell, look at the first international investigation into the origins of Covid-19, whose findings stayed far away from anything which would turn up the US scientific establishment's involvement in the controversial gain-of-function experiments at the very Wuhan lab in question. There's no reason to believe an inquiry focused on the Wuhan lab wouldn't be rigged to hurt China while leaving the US empire looking clean as a whistle, whether the virus did in fact originate there or not.
None of the people pushing for an investigation of the Wuhan lab seem to have any idea how such an investigation could take place in a fair and impartial way. They just say "We need to get to the bottom of this!" and "We need to find the truth!", without ever saying who "we" is or how they would be "finding the truth" in a way that is not subject to the manipulations the US government always inserts into international disputes whose outcomes it has a vested interest in. It doesn't seem like anyone's even thought about this little wrinkle in their plan, or if they have they haven't thought very hard.
When I point this out people act like it means I have some sort of aversion to the truth. "So you just don't want to know where the virus started?" they ask incredulously. It's not that I don't want to know, it's that there's no possible mechanism which could produce results that I find trustworthy on an international stage which is continually manipulated by the US empire. You'd have to get the US empire to cease behaving in the way it always behaves.
When I ask people how there could possibly be a fair and impartial investigation into the Wuhan lab, they can never answer me. This is because we all know there is no possible scenario under which China or anyone else could trust that the US would not engage in the same kind of manipulations it always does. Beijing would be absolutely insane to open its doors to such an investigation, because it would have no way of preventing the US and its lackeys from manipulating the results and producing a narrative which fully incriminates the Chinese government while leaving Washington innocent.
I don't know where Covid-19 came from; there are many different theories, some of which cast doubt that the virus originated in China at all. I just know that viruses happen, that there's no valid reason for them to drive us apart instead of bringing us together, and that the US war machine is inherently untrustworthy.
Tom Cotton is such a disgusting warmonger that a Washington Post columnist once warned that he would be "most likely to start World War III" if he became president. He's been openly saying for over a year that he plans on making China "pay" for the damage caused by Covid-19, and now he is seizing on the increasing acceptance of the theory that the virus may have escaped from a Wuhan laboratory to manufacture a demand for more cold war escalations against Beijing.
There's a special revulsion among American opponents of rampant US military expansionism for Beltway war hawks who avoided military enlistment in their youth, disdainfully branding them "chickenhawks", but in my opinion a hawk like Cotton who has seen war firsthand is far worse. Someone who seeks to expand the horrors of war without ever having experienced those horrors is less of a monster than a veteran who experienced those horrors and seeks to create more of them, because they know exactly what they are inflicting upon the world and are choosing to do it anyway.
There's a quote from the movie Jack Reacher:
"There are four types of people who join the military. For some, it's family trade. Others are patriots, eager to serve. Next you have those who just need a job. Then there's the kind who want the legal means of killing other people."
Tom Cotton's insatiable appetite for war throughout his entire adult life makes it abundantly obvious that he is the fourth kind.
Not everyone who supports an investigation into the lab leak theory is a warmonger, but warmongers will definitely be happy if they get that investigation. One thing's for sure: we're not getting the truth regardless.
_________________________
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, following me on Facebook, Twitter, Soundcloud or YouTube, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Ko-fi, Patreon or Paypal. If you want to read more you can buy my books. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
This goes far beyond hyper-nationalistic bloviators like Mr. Cotton. It's part and parcel of the inability/unwillingness to limit the scope of research or at least stringently enforce biosafety requirements. As a molecular biologist, someone might expect me to be gung-ho about pursuing all lines of research in immunology and virology: the free-inquiry version of science. But science within a rapacious capitalist system is science in need of serious regulation, and Mary Shelley was prescient about the inability of humans to exercise restraint; but at least the impacts of her "monster" were far more limited than the potential impacts of careless gof research. In the context of a profit-mad society, gain-of-function (gof) research is driven by Pharma profiteering, despite the fact that there may be individual scientists who are motivated by higher ideals, such as protection of society from infectious diseases. Gof research is incredibly chancy because we tinker with genetic systems whose complexity is as yet barely appreciated by researchers and is mostly opaque to the public and the investor class. It appears operationally impossible to adequately regulate such research, at minimum to ensure that it's done only under BSL3/4 laboratory safeguards. This is a question of scientific ethics, not of nationalism.
Tom Cotton personifies a system which rewards dysfunction, rebranding it into what's called "a serious person, a friend of Israel, and a good God-fearing Christian." Washington swarms with such creatures and there is no systemic alternative. Until we call out and smash this conveyor belt of shite, the road to hell we're travelling should surprise no one.