64 Comments
User's avatar
Boris Petrov's avatar

U.N. voted 130–against 2 (US and Ukraine) to outlaw Nazism.

On 16 December, 2021, the United Nations tabled a resolution that called for “combating glorification of Nazism, neo–Nazism and other practices that contribute to fueling contemporary forms of racism.” The only nations to vote against it were the United States and Ukraine.

Every Russian knows that it was across the plains of Ukraine’s “borderland” that Hitler’s divisions swept from the west in 1941, bolstered by Ukraine’s Nazi cultists and collaborators. The result was more than 20 million Russian dead. This is the driving force behind Russia’s respect-seeking, self-protective security proposals, which were published in Moscow in the week the U.N. voted 130–2 to outlaw Nazism. They are:

- NATO guarantees that it will not deploy missiles in nations bordering Russia. (They are already in place from Slovenia to Romania, with Poland to follow.)

- NATO to stop military and naval exercises in nations and seas bordering Russia.

- Ukraine will not become a member of NATO.

- The West and Russia to sign a binding East–West security pact.

- The landmark treaty between the US and Russia covering intermediate-range nuclear weapons to be restored. (The U.S. abandoned it in 2019.)

These amount to a comprehensive draft of a peace plan for all of postwar Europe and ought to be welcomed in the West. But who understands their significance? We are told that Putin is a pariah, “killer” and a threat to Christendom. Russian-speaking Ukrainians, under economic blockade by Kyiv for seven years, are fighting for their survival. The “massing” army we seldom hear about is the 13 Ukrainian brigades laying siege to Donbas: an estimated 150,000 troops.

(John Pilger - www.johnpilger.com )

“War in Europe and the rise of raw propaganda.” - The Scrum (substack.com) – Feb. 19, 2022

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

This UN resolution is being brought on annually, I believe, and consistently is voted "No" by the US. Since 2014 when it became a full-blown Nazi state Ukraine has joined in. An example for 2020: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3894841?ln=en.

Note that all European lapdogs "abstain", including Germany.

Expand full comment
Boris Petrov's avatar

Thank you for clarification. And the whole thing can be resolved with ONE sentence: Ukraine will NOT join NATO.

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

Ukraine in NATO is rather irrelevant at this point.

Russia presented what can be considered an ultimatum on overall security problem in December and the response received from the collective West has not been satisfactory. The current state of affairs is described here: https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1799157/

Ukraine is just a part of a much larger problem that Russia is going to press on for a swift resolution. It's come to a head now overall. Ukraine is just a symptom.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

I saw where Ireland abstained, as did 48 other countries. I was unable to find a reason or reasons for their doing so, which strikes me as odd, as I never considered Ireland as a hotbed for defending Nazism. Perhaps there's more at play here?

Expand full comment
Boris Petrov's avatar

I think - US pressure. When allies are uncomfortable -- they abstain...

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

So the US pressure to not condemn Nazism in Ukraine outweighed Israel's pressure for them to do so? Wow, that reveals some impressive trajectory; I would have loved to listen in on that conversation.

Expand full comment
Stephen Verchinski's avatar

Great reply and spot on. Thank you. Shared.

Expand full comment
Tereza Coraggio's avatar

I'm caught between wanting to mention my book, How to Dismantle an Empire, and not wanting to go near the far-flung self-promotional references in this thread. But really, um, it is kinda on-point. It points out the obvious which, as Caitlin says, is like a fish trying to see the water it's swimming in. And, after it exposes the contradictions in thinking and twisted history we've been raised on, it gives a way we could (relatively easily) change the system so we could build those alternative communities we really want. Just sayin'.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

There's a difference between adding to the discussion and then referencing a book you wrote to going "Here's the TRUTH, Duckface! You guys are idiots!" Kind of subtle but there nevertheless.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Every Substack writer shares their own work with each other, especially when relevant. If you were to follow other writers than your adored Caitlin you would see that & maybe learn to accept it.

Expand full comment
Jim Prues's avatar

Well you certainly touch folks emotions with such notions Caitlyn, which bodes well for such notions being true.

Expand full comment
Contrarian 33's avatar

"No other regime has spent the 21st century slaughtering people by the millions in wars of aggression. No other regime is circling the planet with hundreds of military bases. No other regime works to destroy any nation which disobeys it using starvation sanctions, war and terror. Only the US-centralized empire does this. While supporting most of the world's dictators."

Has there ever been a better summary than this comment from Caitlin today...and so relevant to the USA as it has now become.

I do not see how America can ever return to normal as the 2022 objectives and resulting actions as described so well are now the new normal, accepted as they are by so many countries, enforced not by friendships and common interests but by trade sanctions, financial pressures and the actions of the US once-hidden criminal army, the CIA.

Empires in the past have failed for just one tenth of the arrogant standards now on display out of Washington. The beginning of the end.

Expand full comment
Stephen Verchinski's avatar

In the 19th century many nations played at military empire. The philosophy behind much of it came out of academia. In my opinion we were (and continue to be) in a "special relationship" brought forward post 1812 with the British and we never shared them off since. Today their empire is controlled by banking elites with the City of London holding sway with the Queen of England and those that swear allegiance like the PM of Canada, Justin Trudeau, and shadowed by the other Commonwealth nations like New Zealand and Australia.

Expand full comment
june tenth's avatar

let's focus on building alternative communities.

Expand full comment
anti-republocrat's avatar

Regarding "journalism school," a co-worker told me his daughter selected a journalism major in college, but changed her major when a professor told her class that journalists do not exist to discover and report the truth, but should faithfully report what their government and editors want them to report. I think she eventually went to law school. I hope she followed in the footsteps of William Kunstler or today's Robert Barnes.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

This is obviously the kind of "journalists" they're cranking out now; those more concerned with a cushy career up the corporate ladder and continued access to points of power. You don't do that by rocking the boat, at least not anymore.

Expand full comment
anti-republocrat's avatar

It's quite difficult to accept that the entire medical establishment is corrupt and trying to kill you, an integral part of the most corrupt empire in recorded history. How could all those people we had always looked up to, who had dedicated their lives to helping people and saving lives, possibly be involved with something so evil? It wasn't hard to accept a pocket of incompetence uncovered by Erin Olszewski (https://www.bitchute.com/video/3ivASg6BHp1y/); the capture of WHO and Anthony Fauci by Bill Gates and Big Pharma, exposed by the Eastern Virginia Medical School and FLCCC; and the capture of virtually all of corporate media by those same evil elites. After all, we had learned of the lies and government involvement in all the assassinations of the '60s, the Vietnam War, Iran-Contra, April Glaspie and Desert Storm, WMD and Iraq part 2, Libya and Syria. We could accept corruption at the pinnacle of authority, but surely our own trusted physicians, with whom we had a decades long, seemingly personal relationship, would do what's best for us. Yes, of course some would be ignorant, so I read up about zinc and zinc ionophores, Dr. Zelenko, vitamins C and D. My physician had endorsed a vitamin D supplement, and about that time I tested out at 43 mg/mL. I did a bit more investigation and learned Fauci was taking 6,000 IUs/day, so I did the same and am now > 60 ng/mL.

The first inkling I had that my faith in the medical profession in general was unwarranted was when I asked my Mayo Clinic internist at the end of 2020 whether he'd be willing to prescribe either HCQ or IVM should I become ill with Covid-19. After several days delay, no doubt consulting with the hierarchy, he dodged the question and told me treatment would be up to "the treatment team." That made me uncomfortable, but the Clinic had repaired a hernia, saved me from a PE, cancer and a heart attack. I investigated telemedicine and got prophylactic IVM through that route. When 6 mos. later, I heard Dr. Ardis describe how Remdesevir and ventilators had become "standard of care," I was skeptical. Then I heard Dr. Vliet describe how difficult it had been to force Mayo to continue IVM or discharge a patient, so I investigated Mayo's website on Covid-19 and discovered they were indeed using Remdesevir. About the same time I learned that, through a "carrot and stick" approach, CMS has forced virtually all hospitals and clinics to adopt Remdesevir and ventilation, just as Dr. Ardis had said. Finding it difficult to get more IVM through telemedicine, I ordered HCQ, IVM and doxy OTC from India and started an HCQ prophylactic at the start of flu season.

I continue my journey, no longer an advocate of Medicare for All, unable to support either Democrats, Trump or most Republicans because of foreign/military policy, and Empire (whether globalist or US-centric as Trump wants). The Western system is deeply corrupt, far more corrupt than any "banana republic" at which we point our collective fingers, be it Venezuela, Nicaragua or even El Salvador. I pray for US collapse and a restoration of the values of the Founders in some small group of states or localities.

As we work our way through these troubled times, I think we need to focus on the professed ideals of the Revolution embodied in the Bill of Rights. I think that's something that can unite and galvanize the people once they see the crime and betrayal. If we ever have a chance to rebuild, we need to institute additional checks and balances that make it more difficult to violate those rights in the future, especially by corporate entities, which MUST be understood to be creatures of the State. It would help to remind people that the Boston Tea Party was a revolt against the East India Company (chartered by the Crown), not directly against the Crown itself.

Expand full comment
Doris Wrench Eisler's avatar

The tyrants of old, the Genghis Khans, were straight-forward: they didn't claim divine guidance and inspiration. They just weren't likeable, and it was obvious, but it took a while before they became intolerable. So it's not difficult to see how populations fed on the idea that concepts of justice and the good are the monopoly of their system and government and so are moved in the wrong direction, time after time, by the same tired old tricks. And wanting to believe is greatly reinforced by the fact that the US not only has the biggest military arsenal, it also controls world banking, without access to which we all either starve in the cold, or starve in the excessive heat. Maybe the first step is to say, in effect, we bow down to you mammon because we must, but under protest: we know who you are.

Expand full comment
Stephen Verchinski's avatar

We have a dominant military empire. That is a truth. To conflate all of government to be thrown out is a bad scenario. What would it be replaced with? Global government under Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, the wealthiest untrustworthy corporations in the world?

I am of the belief that the Constitution and Bill of Rights and amendments are still our best shot at freedom. Can and must it be improved? Yes, but of course.

Though you have never stated it, there are folks out there that believe in socialist totalitarianism. Those that believe that scientific socialism by scientists and technocrats is the way.

That path too leads to ruinous government policy.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

Wise words, although you skipped another very real and equally noxious option, and that is a return to religious totalitarianism. I have no desire to live in the United States of Jesus.

Jefferson warned at the dawn of the new republic of two threats -- standing armies and the corrupting influence of moneyed interests. Now we have both. How to claw our way back to founding principles while incorporating beneficial tweaks is the task before us, but I hear very few politicians wishing to take that journey -- or citizens, for that matter.

Expand full comment
Contrarian 33's avatar

Not being American and therefore not familiar with the statements of people like Jefferson, his warnings as you have stated are so relevant in today's climate, Riff. One only has to see the shareholding of our now very wealthy Pharma companies held by the likes of BlackRock and Vanguard and to add to that also their interests in technology organisation who benefit for the proposed massive vaccine passport schemes and the like currently under consideration, to know with no fear of contradiction that this is all part of the one long game.

Important to resolve this Covid issue asap and at the same time legislate to eliminate the undue influences that currently exist in what is the "fourth arm of government", certainly in the USA. How were such organisations ever allowed to become so powerful, equal to governments and then some.

At the same time, eliminate totally the subservient relationship the the US currently accepts with continual sponsored trips to Israel by Pelosi and her sycophantic elected politicians, dancing to the parasitic Israeli beat.

What a humiliating relationship that is, which goes so far back to the crime known as the USS Liberty affair in 1967. That is when the die was cast, expanded every year since then to what it is today.......total Israeli domination.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

During the Suez Crisis in the 50s Eisenhower actually stood up to Israel forcing them to back down from attacking Egypt. I believe it was then that they launched a long term plan to see that that never happened again.

They did this by ingratiating themselves to the MIC while their money was used to buy political allies. Of course, friendly media propaganda helped as well.

Of course now we see the insane situation we have today, where the maintenance of a Jewish State in Palestine is somehow unalterably linked to the trajectory and welfare of the United States -- a ludicrous proposition on its face. That we're not even supposed to question this arrangement makes it all the more abhorrent and unAmerican (Did someone say foreign entanglements?).

What's going on in Canada is a hopeful sign. As we begin to address government corruption and overreach, the unwarranted support of Zionism must a be part of any reform agenda.

Expand full comment
Contrarian 33's avatar

Your mention of Eisenhower, a military man, but something of a realist, and the fact that he always warned about the growth and power of the military / industrial complex. I'll never forget that, back in 1961. His final address.

Not a single President has mentioned it since. I'll bet that the dirty hands of BlackRock and Vanguard are well represented in those ranks as well together as with the all levels of government, clearly being Legislature, (owned, boots and all). Executive, (full of paid puppets). Judiciary, (can't believe that they are not in there, somewhere).

As for Israel, Kennedy's death could have been as a result of resisting Israel's interests in nuclear weapons but if interested in Hans Christian Andersen fiction, try the Warren report. After that sad event and Johnson's succession to the throne followed by the pathetic USS Liberty backdown, the US has has been eroded by Tel Aviv and its US-domiciled disciples ever year since.

Expand full comment
Lioness of Judah Ministry's avatar

The "Holy Roman" Fourteenth Amendment American Jesuit Empire created in 1868, a part of the Revived Roman Empire which reigns supreme over the entire world

The World Is A Stage.

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-world-is-a-stage-klaus-schwab

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Exactly!

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

Unlike the BLM protests which were accompanied by looting, burning, and shooting, the ones going on now in Canada have been entirely peaceful, yet the government and its police -- expensively dressed as Star Wars extras -- insist on acting like WWIII has broken out, and perhaps for ensconced politicians like Trudeau, it nearly has.

Ultimate pustule Antony Blinken would be proud of the fund freezing going on, as if citizens peacefully assembling for a redress of grievances were their own little wayward country to be sanctioned to death or compliance -- whichever comes first.

The facade of our true rights is paper thin, and like a kleenex after a good sneeze, on a government whim, there won't be much left of it that's recognizable.

Expand full comment
june tenth's avatar

neither "defunding the police" nor "peaceful demonstration" will produce meaningful change though they inspire and unite people. "boycotting the system" while "building alternatives" will.

Expand full comment
John Purcell's avatar

I think we need a whole different form of government (REAL government, NOT the Bullshit we call "government" today, which is nothing more than the Public Administrative Arm of the Big Banks and Corporations). Society desperately needs leaders, but we have none at all today. Lying backstabbing politicians whose campaigns are funded and controlled by the Billionaire Oligarchs and their privately owned Big Banks and Corporations, and who swear allegiance to the Zionist Terrorist State, is not the answer, and they are the exact opposite of leaders.

I think we need a Constitutional Monarchy System with a Socialist Economy that benefits all of society as a whole. The monarchy would provide the leadership that society so desperately needs, and the Socialist Economy would provide a Fair Market Economy, instead of the Grotesque, Greedy, Corrupt Capitalist Economy. In the system I envision, there would be no regular armed forces (no regular full time military), only a part time National Guard, and a Coast Guard, no Pentagon, no CIA, no DIA, no NSA, no Homeland Insecurity, etc., and no long list of alphabet soup of Federal "Law Enforcement" Agencies. The King would be the REAL Legitimate Commander in Chief of the National Guard in a time of war, actually leading the troops into battle (not hiding out at Camp David, or the Ranch like Dubya did while sending the brainwashed Empirial Stormtroopers to fight for Wall Street and Israel) but otherwise the various National Guard units throughout the provinces would be under the command of their provincial governors in peace time. If needed in the case of actual attack by a foreign power, the monarchy could call up volunteers for a full scale army to fight the invading forces to augment the National Guard forces, but such full scale army would have to be disbanded by law within say 6 months to 1 year after the end of the war.

As far as a Socialist Economy, the kind I envision would be one in which their are no privately owned, usury, debt slavery banks, only a government owned, non usury based central bank with local branches throughout the provinces to help finance infrastructure projects, and in which the public could receive seed money to start a family farm, or family run small business at the local level. The public could keep their money, if they so choose in local coop banks, owned by the public themselves at the local level, similar to a credit union. The currency would be REAL Cash, NOT digitally controlled Big Brother Orwellian Cashless "Currency", and it could be backed by Silver for general public commerce and the paying of legitimate taxes, while at the same time, there could be a limited Gold Standard for Legitimate Transactions with other countries. There would be NO privately owned Big Business whatsoever, but the government would outright own and control the energy industry, permanently taking the corrupt profit motive out of such industry, and run the industry on behalf of the Public Interest, NOT some Private Corporate Interest, and at the same time work on healthier, cleaner, more renewable sources of energy. There should be NO Corporations whatsover. Every private business should be either a sole proprietorship (meaning one single owner), or a simple partnership (meaning two owners). And home ownership should be encouraged throughout society, as actual family residences, NOT as some warped, twisted "investment" that prices much of the public out of home ownership. Trade unions and skilled quality craftsmen should be encouraged. Agriculture should be ORGANIC And NON GMO, and should be done at the local level, NOT on giant corporate farms and ranches. For that which cannot be grown or made domestically, Fair Trade would exist with other countries, NOT the "Free" Trade system of today that ONLY benefits the Billionaire Oligarchs and their Corporations and Corrupt Politicians who work for them. And there should be a solid safety net for the Poor and to prevent Homelessness. I think a system like this would not be perfect, but would be the best system mankind has ever come up with that would be a fair, and just system, and that would provide the necessary leadership that society so desperately needs. There are other ideas I have too, about a Fair Justice System, NOT the Prison Industrial Complex System we have here in the U.S. that goes right along with the Military Industrial Complex System. Also, free, or at least very low cost health care, good public education, etc. could also be a part of the system. And as far as taxes are concerned, the poor would NOT be expected to pay taxes, only the wealthy (and, YES wealth WOULD BE LIMITED), the middle class, and business interests would pay taxes. And NO property taxes for people's homes, especially NOT for the poor and middle class. The wealthy might be expected to pay a one time tax the time they purchase their home. And by wealthy, I mean people who may have a business, and make a few million dollars, but Multi Millionaires with Hundreds of Millions of the currency, and Billionaires WOULD NOT be allowed, period!!! A business owner SHOULD NOT be allowed to make more than 10 times more than their lowest paid employee.

Expand full comment
John Purcell's avatar

And prices for basic necessities of the public MUST BE regulated, and this includes housing and food. I know this will make the "Free" Market scoundrels scream bloody murder, but TOUGH SHIT!!! They KNOW this actually works for the public benefit, which is why the CIA and U.S. Military ARE ALWAYS used to undermine all the Socialist countries around the world!!!

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

re: Anne Applebaum:

Even Freedom House (a US government funded propaganda organ) refers to Ukraine as "partly free".

https://freedomhouse.org/country/ukraine/freedom-world/2021

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

I was curious as to how they would rate the American media. They gave it a 3 out of 4, with this notation: "Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 due to a dramatic increase in arrests of and physical assaults on journalists across the country during the year, with most cases linked to coverage of protests."

So other than the arresting of journalists during a protest, everything is just wide open and peachy in corporate media land. What a joke.

Expand full comment
Michele's avatar

Any thoughts on Klaus Schwab? The World Economic Forum? The Great Reset? "Build Back Better"?The long list of his 'Young Global Leaders' academy alumni, which include many current world leaders, along with many other people of influence? This group is not to be ignored. Member Treudeaus recent despicable actions getting virtually no reactions from world leaders. Crickets.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

You make me laugh. Your husband has you by the short & curlies.

There is no US Empire!

Will you please wake up to the truth?

Read this:

https://francesleader.substack.com/p/who-wants-ww3?utm_source=url

Expand full comment
Yarpen's avatar

So as a prof of your assertion you linked a piece you wrote yourself. That is some circular thinking.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

Defenders of Israel do it all the time by constantly referring to a book they wrote. ;-)

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

lol - I do not defend Israel which is another victim nation controlled by the Black Nobility.

Expand full comment
JohnOnKaui's avatar

You might want to always explain your use of the term "Black Nobility". Pretty much though, you come across as a "nut case". I'm not saying you are, just providing a critique of your article so you might consider a bit more carefully what you're writing.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

I refer you back to the link in my original comment above which adequately explains in exhaustive detail, with references, who the Black Nobility are.

You come across as ill informed and yet judgemental. I am providing you with a critique of your lack of attention to detail so that you might consider a bit more carefully what you are writing.

Expand full comment
JohnOnKaui's avatar

Yes, when I went to your link, I recognized you were not referring to race. However, I went there to give you the benefit of the doubt. I will not be going to one of your links again since I don't consider them very well written or very persuasive.

Many people will read your comment and consider you a racist. I'm just telling you up front that was my first impression. If you want to take offense that people don't understand you, that's entirely up to you. I'm not going to defend your position.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

Your take is a tough sell in Gaza I'd wager.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Hardly! It was a Palestinian who helped me to recognise how Jews had been manipulated to occupy Palestine for, and on behalf of, the Black Nobility. The Zionists are not genuine Jews, but you would know this if you had spent some time actually reading my attached articles instead of dishing bitchcraft at my temerity for sharing them.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

So all Gaza shares this Palestinian's idea of manipulated Jews? I highly doubt it, and thus, it remains a tough sell.

And I never once denigrated you sharing your views on here; in fact, I encouraged you and everyone else to do so. I only questioned your tone and the posting of a link to a long article minus any sort of preliminary groundwork to let readers know what it was about. Maybe Caitlin is fine when posters do this but I find it rather crass. Fine. I'm not saying I'm right; only sharing my impression which is after all only fit for me.

Believe me, I understand the frustration when others don't see THE TRUTH as it seems so blazingly clear to us, but you must also realize the difference between using a shoehorn and a bullhorn. You seem overly attached to the latter.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Circular thinking? Try reading my articles & the references within before trying your luck with me.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

Putting aside the larger points of your article, I have a problem with your main statement that there is no US empire. Clearly, there is.

Perhaps as you state it's controlled by a bunch of inbred europeans -- and I'm giving you the benefit of doubt here -- but they must exert their influence in some manner, and I don't see how the US empire isn't a dandy means for doing so.

Now, how do we redress this problem, in a country where we can't even pass universal health care during a pandemic? Running off to take down a secret european society seems like a bit of a fanciful overreach, doesn't it?

But here's my main problem: Using Caitlin's audience to flog your own writings. Others may disagree, but it strikes me as rather opportunistic and self-serving. Maybe others can chime in on this.

I love hearing others' opinions here, however much I may disagree with them. I cherish the debate and hopefully I learn something new along the way. I often have.

But leave Caitlin's husband out of this; I'm sure he hasn't pulled anyone's short hairs lately.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Flogging my writing? I make no money from my work, sunshine.

How would you prefer that I inform you?

By re writing all my decades of research in a comment here?

Get real.

As for the US Empire, I take no pleasure in pointing out that as long as the US Federal Reserve is privately owned by European Royal families, the USA will be used to supply cannon fodder/muscle for the Black Nobility agenda.

Caitlin's husband is US citizen & has been under the typical US supremacy illusion that the Black Nobs have nurtured since they grabbed the Fed in 1913.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

So we're leading with sunshine, are we?

My use of flogging didn't mean to imply your making a profit; merely that you appeared to be shopping your wares in a stall built by another vendor. If my language was imprecise, I apologize for that.

As for how you might better present your ideas, I'd suggest a shorter, more engaging Reader's Digest version of your lifetime's work instead of leading with the condescending snark which has so far marked your posts. Once you've peaked interest, only then might you entice respondents to further avail themselves of the pleasure of your intellectual bounty.

As for your presumptions regarding Mr. Caitlin, this recalls one of my points previously stated, left unaddressed, rooted in practicality, that one goes for a jog in the park to break in a new pair of running shoes rather than booking a flight to Nepal to scale Everest. Every new motorcycle has a break-in period. Ideas carry a similar recommendation. Disregard this at your own peril.

I happen to agree with you regarding the Fed, but only to make my point rather than yours: If we can't even get anyone to do a simple thing like an audit, doing a full Paul Revere routine regarding the Black Nobs -- and seemingly dismissing those of us who don't fully accept what you're saying as hapless rubes -- seems premature as well as highly counter-productive.

I'd stick around, but it's past my bedtime; I'm expected to rise at dawn in the east.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

I don't recall asking you for advice.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

"How would you prefer that I inform you?"

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Rhetorical questions do not require an answer.

Expand full comment
J M Hatch's avatar

Hive? Why don't you just go ahead and wear your KKK robes in public, and then you don't have to hide that feces... face of yours.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Slick revelation of your misconceptions. Hive.blog is a blockchain social media platform. Hive is something entirely different. Get back in your racist box.

Expand full comment
Riff McClavin's avatar

I believe Mr. Hatch assumed the phrase Black Nobility referred to actual Negroes and not to a self-described group of inbred evil-doing Europeans -- thus his understandable reference to the KKK. His fault for skimming, but I would assume the Black Nobility must get this kind of foul-up all the time, resulting in a never-ending series of Seinfeld-like PR nightmares. I blame them for this, actually. They should probably consult Snoop Dog on how to pick a better handle; after all, everybody loves Snoop Dog.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Many people do react before searching terms that they have not heard before.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Feb 21, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

From what I can tell, Israel tries to have it both ways with regard to Ukraine.

On the one hand, the open Nazism of the junta makes Israel understandably nervous.

On the other, they want to keep their American sponsors happy, and there aren't that many Jews in Ukraine any more to really raise a stink over.

Expand full comment
russian_bot's avatar

The main guy in Ukraine is a Jew. The "main", of course, should be put in many quotes but nevertheless.

However, as Jews say - when a Jew is smart he's really smart, and when a Jew is dumb (or any other adjective here) he's really dumb.

Expand full comment