Amazing imagery in a skinny word count. One of your best. "rapefinger plutocrats with pointy teeth" indeed! The world currently seems awash in them. To our collective dismay.
Powerful poem, dear Caitlin. We'll keep shining the light but holy shit how relieved was I when the U.S. DOJ admitted they didn't release more images or videos from the Epstein files. Not sure how much more I can stand of the unvarnished truth. Torturing children, whether in Gaza or the U.S., is the Zionist modus operandi.
Dear Lisa, I have been mulling over the torture of children for 20 years and I guess there are many separate causes, but I don't see it as "Zionist." I am open to any suggestion, and would appreciate your expanding on this. I do know there was the Sabbatean sect, as criticised by Rabbi Antelman. I've also noticed Jewish-sounding names, such as Sidney Gottlieb, in the CIA's torturing of children, but these are not a majority. All right, Les Wexner seems to have been the boss of Epstein and that whole thing seems to have been Mossad-based. But what does 'zionist' do for us as explanation? Excuse me if I am being thick as a board. I am desperate to get to the bottom of this inhuman behaviour.
Because the torture of children has been such a prominent part of the genocide in Gaza, and because it seems clear that JE & GM were/are Mossad assets who tortured children and encouraged others to do so, I wrote: torture is part of the Zionist m.o.
I did not write "torture is Zionist" because that is not what I meant.
Nor was I trying to explain torture. I was connecting dots in my horrified mind between world events that are not overtly linked i.e. release of some Epstein files and the world standing by while the U.S. and Israel commit genocide.
And bombing a school bus full of children. And bombing a funeral hall in the capital city, killing 155 and wounding at least 525. And yes, there was a starvation blockade.
Yes, I see. Thank you. Or to put it more broadly, if you can set aside your morals to achieve power, then the rules of power-achievement start to control you.
The brilliant Agent131711 thinks "Wex" & Jeff were not just boss & operative but lovers!!! OMG, I am struggling to visualise them "together". If true (and nothing surprises me any more), that's some secret you're keeping there, Wex!
Pape (?) says Zionism has morphed into a Genocidal State(s), the U.S. included with Israel. Increasing the level of consciousness is the only way to come out of this, IMO. Bering aware of the harm we do...
I think that pretty much describes where we're all at who actually pay attention or pray ascension. This is the collapse of any meaning that we were still clinging onto, the end of any and all illusions regarding the civilisation project of the last 6,000 years. It's no longer 'how soon is now' but, 'if not now, then when' and the road ahead seems as empty, dead and deliberately reduced to rubble piled on human bones as Gaza. Peace is just the millisecond between wars, and good the idiot's tale told before the diabolists' throne. Or at least, so it seems.
Epstein can now be clearly seen to have been highly motivated to launder his reputation. Chomsky would talk to anybody. He answered all emails in a way that compares to Ringo Starr before too many scams drove Ringo to stop.
Epstein was very skilled at presenting himself in interesting and charming ways. He was eminently capable of offering well-informed insights about the workings of the international financial systems and the limitations of the men who ran those institutions or who tried to profit from their vagaries.
The idea that Chomsky would have time for or interest in “partying” with Epstein’s crowd seems less than plausible. The idea that Chomsky would participate in the sexual abuse of young women and girls seems even more farfetched. It is an idea that seems to collapse under even extremely modest scrutiny.
Chomsky is well-known for speaking up for the oppressed and the dominated. He is not currently able to speak out in his own defense. If he could, he still might prefer to continue to work with competent scholars as well as those who are motivated to expose the abuse of power in our political and economic systems. I doubt that anyone who knew him well would have any qualms about working with him, or give credence to what amounts to only crude “guilt by association.”
The jump from “association” to “partying” and then from “partying” to “complicit participation” is simply not supported by any credible facts or defensible logic. I think the idea of Chomsky sexually abusing young women and girls is painful to you — or you would not have referenced that notion in a poem. We should all be wary of those who would betray us or our values. We should especially beware of permitting such wariness to betray ourselves.
From Chat GPT:
There’s no credible evidence that Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein “partied” together in the sense of socializing at Epstein’s infamous island parties or being part of his sexual-abuse network — but there is documented evidence of contact and association between them. Here’s what is known from reliable reporting and released documents:
📌 Documented Interactions Between Chomsky and Epstein
1. Long-term correspondence and meetings:
Emails and other documents released by the U.S. House Oversight Committee show that Chomsky and Epstein were in regular contact for years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from an underage girl. In at least some of these communications, Chomsky described their exchanges as intellectually engaging. 
2. Shared photos and appearances in Epstein files:
Photographs from Epstein’s personal archive — released by Congress — include images of Chomsky with Epstein, including one reportedly showing them seated next to each other (e.g., on a plane). 
3. Transfers of funds via Epstein-linked accounts:
Financial records indicate that about $270,000 was transferred from an account connected to Epstein to Chomsky, which Chomsky later said involved moving around his own assets and did not come directly from Epstein. 
4. Scheduled meetings in Epstein’s calendar:
Epstein’s personal calendar — part of the released documents — lists planned meetings between Epstein and Chomsky in the mid-2010s, showing they were at least scheduled to meet socially and in professional contexts. 
📌 What There Isn’t Evidence For
•There’s no confirmed credible evidence that Chomsky attended the notorious Epstein island parties or participated in the sexual abuse network Epstein ran. The available photos and records show them in contact, but not participating in or facilitating Epstein’s criminal activities.
•Being pictured with Epstein or having meetings with him does not by itself prove wrongdoing — and many high-profile individuals appear in Epstein’s files without involvement in his crimes. 
🗓️ When and where the interactions took place
2015–2017 timeframe (post-Epstein conviction):
•Court-released documents and calendars from Epstein’s personal archives show scheduled meetings between Epstein and Noam Chomsky in 2015 and 2016 — years after Epstein had already been convicted (in 2008) of procuring a minor for prostitution. 
•One confirmed encounter took place in March 2015 at the Harvard office of mathematician Martin Nowak, where Epstein met with a group including Chomsky and Nowak. •Reports also mention multiple occasions in 2015–2016 where Epstein allegedly arranged logistics (e.g., flights) or meetings involving Chomsky and others — for example a planned dinner with director Woody Allen and his wife, though Chomsky cast doubt on whether that actually occurred. 
Locations inferred from reporting:
•Harvard University (Cambridge, MA) — the 2015 meeting. 
•Epstein’s private calendar engagements — likely included his Manhattan townhouse and possibly flights between cities, as suggested by the scheduling, though specifics aren’t all confirmed. 
•A Congress-released photo shows Chomsky with Epstein on a plane — but the date and destination remain undated in the public release. 
Importantly — and clarifying public confusion — there’s no verified evidence Chomsky attended Epstein’s private island parties or had social interactions in that context; his documented interactions were meetings and exchanges. 
⸻
🧠 What Chomsky has said in response
Chomsky’s own responses, across different times and forums, include the following themes:
1. Meetings were private or routine academic exchanges
•When asked by The Wall Street Journal, Chomsky flatly said his meetings with Epstein were “none of your business” before confirming that he knew him and that they met occasionally. He described their discussions as focused on politics and academics. 
2. Normalization of contact after conviction
•Chomsky argued that, in U.S. society, once someone has served a sentence, they “re-enter society under prevailing norms,” and that he didn’t see scientific or political discussions with a convicted offender as inherently inappropriate. 
3. Described the exchanges in a supportive way
•In one undated handwritten letter in the Epstein files, Chomsky reportedly called Epstein a “highly valued friend” and described their “regular contact” as “a most valuable experience,” praising Epstein for helping him understand aspects of the global financial system and recounting introductions Epstein arranged. 
4. Comments framed around intellectual liberty
•In earlier remarks before the latest document releases, Chomsky said he had met all sorts of people, including those convicted of serious crimes, and did not regret those meetings — positioning it as a matter of open intellectual engagement rather than endorsement of wrongdoing. 
🧠 Summary
So in short:
•Chomsky did know Epstein and maintained communication after Epstein’s 2008 conviction.
•Their association included emails, meetings, and shared appearances in released documents.
•There is no reliable evidence that Chomsky was part of Epstein’s party scene or his criminal sexual network.
My summary: ''You sleep with the fish, you stink like a fish.'' Chomsky's a fraud and always has been. He's always endorsed the ''official'' story of 9/11 and excoriated the 9/11 truthers. He also said those who declined the Covid poison should be ostracized from society. The BS excuse that it was acceptable to engage with Epstein, because Epstein paid his dues, ignores the fact that Epstein got a sweetheart deal and should have been jailed for life, or worse. Fuck Chomsky and the zio trojan horse he rode in on.
You have every right to condemn somebody via guilt by association.
You have every right to passionately condemn everyone who does not conform to your criteria for purity.
But don’t think you are convincing.
Don’t imagine that you are logical.
And don’t pretend you are just.
I have no way of knowing the exact nature of anybody’s interactions or relationships to any other person. I have no way of knowing what Noam Chomsky “really” thought about Epstein. But I see no serious, substantial evidence to doubt Chomsky’s words about not holding someone’s misdeeds against them after they have been convicted and served their sentence. I can’t find any interesting hint about anything beyond the obvious (to me) conclusion that Chomsky had no way of knowing that Epstein continued (after being released from prison) to personally abuse young women and girls while using them as part of his very profitable and extensive influence network.
Noam Chomsky cannot now defend himself against such scurrilous and unfounded attacks. I have no qualms about suggesting that you should be ashamed of yourself for your own fraudulent “stinking thinking.”
Like I’ve said, you have every right to stew in your own fish juice.
Very well said, Joe. Thank you for confirming my rights! You have the right to remain a fanboy of Ringo Chomsky, too. My ''purity criteria'' is pretty simple in this case....don't hang around with the likes of Epstein!! Don't hide behind the ''justice'' system and pretend that you don't know what's going on with Epstein, Noam. You say that Chomsky ''had no way of knowing......'' That's nonsense. Chomsky had more connections than you can have ''any way of knowing,'' yet he couldn't find out that Epstein continued his malfeasance after ''being released from prison?'' Give yourself a break, Joe. Chomsky had a chance to ''defend himself'' before his mind flew the coop, and he failed magnificently. It's known as conscience avoidance. Stew on that.
Yes, I will maintain my admiration for Ringo and for Noam (who, on consideration of the facts, common decency and even of your criteria) has no need for any kind of defense.
That works. I will always admire Ringo as I was around when he invaded America on the Ed Sullivan shoe. Noam? Sorry, his legacy is permanently, irrevocably tarnished, imo. I get it....maybe he replied to one of your emails at one point, and you're forever grateful that he shined his grace on you. That's fine. It is what it is. Best wishes to you.
He was a real fascist prick over those injections. His insistence that Kennedy would have gone down the same path as LBJ with regard to Vietnam is intellectually bankrupt, as is his whole attitude towards 9/11. His “lesser of two evils” support for Dems like Hillary was disgraceful as well. (And I was once an avid reader and admirer of Chomsky).
Mary, for many of us, there exists a ProLife movement on the left very different than what exists on the right. Our ProLife movement has as a basis, not the wanton killing of unborn innocent fetuses, but the wanton killing of innocent people who get in the way of the Neoliberal agenda--much like the story of Gaza and the footprint of Zionism.
World wide politicians, royals and establishment must have been involved in the EPSTEIN SATANIC EVIL CULT! Many of those same people behind the CO'n'VID 2020 MURDER OF THE VULNERABLE AND ELDERLY and also making money. Add on the POISON JABS! Perfidious anuses only words to describe them!
Sorry, Caitlin, that Chomsky 'popped your cherry' (spoiled your innocence).
I was done with Chomsky years ago, MANY years ago.
Was it before...?
Don't remember when exactly that I had lost my trust in him, but he definitely lost my trust for good when he came out in support of the September 11th false flag.
Roughly, he argued that it couldn't be an inside job as the 10,000 people required to pull off a September 11th false flag could never all keep quiet.
Such a specious argument from a man who gained his fame from language theory.
Shine on you crazy truthtelling diamond. Thank you Caitlin.
It's strange. That Pink Floyd song was the first thing to come to my mind as well!
This Is Not A Drill. Free Palestine...
Yes, Palestinians, Venezuelans, Cubans, Iranians, so much conflict on the heads of US cartel.
Well said, Mr. Nasmith
Love Roger Waters!:
https://grahamlyons.substack.com/p/time-to-be-spartacus?r=3echlt
Amazing imagery in a skinny word count. One of your best. "rapefinger plutocrats with pointy teeth" indeed! The world currently seems awash in them. To our collective dismay.
Powerful poem, dear Caitlin. We'll keep shining the light but holy shit how relieved was I when the U.S. DOJ admitted they didn't release more images or videos from the Epstein files. Not sure how much more I can stand of the unvarnished truth. Torturing children, whether in Gaza or the U.S., is the Zionist modus operandi.
And it's the imperialist m.o. too.
We have to force ourselves to see, and hear the truth. I am right there with you, many times I find sleep nearly impossible. : (
Dear Lisa, I have been mulling over the torture of children for 20 years and I guess there are many separate causes, but I don't see it as "Zionist." I am open to any suggestion, and would appreciate your expanding on this. I do know there was the Sabbatean sect, as criticised by Rabbi Antelman. I've also noticed Jewish-sounding names, such as Sidney Gottlieb, in the CIA's torturing of children, but these are not a majority. All right, Les Wexner seems to have been the boss of Epstein and that whole thing seems to have been Mossad-based. But what does 'zionist' do for us as explanation? Excuse me if I am being thick as a board. I am desperate to get to the bottom of this inhuman behaviour.
Because the torture of children has been such a prominent part of the genocide in Gaza, and because it seems clear that JE & GM were/are Mossad assets who tortured children and encouraged others to do so, I wrote: torture is part of the Zionist m.o.
I did not write "torture is Zionist" because that is not what I meant.
Nor was I trying to explain torture. I was connecting dots in my horrified mind between world events that are not overtly linked i.e. release of some Epstein files and the world standing by while the U.S. and Israel commit genocide.
I stand corrected. Thank you.
A few years ago the US helped the Saudi's genocide the Yemini's, which was mainly by starvation of kids. INCREDIBLE.
And bombing a school bus full of children. And bombing a funeral hall in the capital city, killing 155 and wounding at least 525. And yes, there was a starvation blockade.
Pathocracy goes at least some way in explaining it, even if it offers few examples of how to stop it.
Yes, I see. Thank you. Or to put it more broadly, if you can set aside your morals to achieve power, then the rules of power-achievement start to control you.
What a lovely bunch of coconuts.
The brilliant Agent131711 thinks "Wex" & Jeff were not just boss & operative but lovers!!! OMG, I am struggling to visualise them "together". If true (and nothing surprises me any more), that's some secret you're keeping there, Wex!
Oh, Caitlin. Thank you for making me cry. Where there is sorrow, there is love. Bless you.
But Caitlin it’s unbearable.
Thank you, Caitlin. The light needs to keep shining for us all. But the images of how sadistic our fellow human beings can be never be erased.
We shine it anyway...
What else can we do?
How do we process this stuff?
I wish I knew.
Pape (?) says Zionism has morphed into a Genocidal State(s), the U.S. included with Israel. Increasing the level of consciousness is the only way to come out of this, IMO. Bering aware of the harm we do...
I think that pretty much describes where we're all at who actually pay attention or pray ascension. This is the collapse of any meaning that we were still clinging onto, the end of any and all illusions regarding the civilisation project of the last 6,000 years. It's no longer 'how soon is now' but, 'if not now, then when' and the road ahead seems as empty, dead and deliberately reduced to rubble piled on human bones as Gaza. Peace is just the millisecond between wars, and good the idiot's tale told before the diabolists' throne. Or at least, so it seems.
we have to keep the light shining so that we know who we are. And who we are not.
How like Francisco Goya's Disasters of War. Etched with acid on metal.
Thank You Caitlin
Epstein can now be clearly seen to have been highly motivated to launder his reputation. Chomsky would talk to anybody. He answered all emails in a way that compares to Ringo Starr before too many scams drove Ringo to stop.
Epstein was very skilled at presenting himself in interesting and charming ways. He was eminently capable of offering well-informed insights about the workings of the international financial systems and the limitations of the men who ran those institutions or who tried to profit from their vagaries.
The idea that Chomsky would have time for or interest in “partying” with Epstein’s crowd seems less than plausible. The idea that Chomsky would participate in the sexual abuse of young women and girls seems even more farfetched. It is an idea that seems to collapse under even extremely modest scrutiny.
Chomsky is well-known for speaking up for the oppressed and the dominated. He is not currently able to speak out in his own defense. If he could, he still might prefer to continue to work with competent scholars as well as those who are motivated to expose the abuse of power in our political and economic systems. I doubt that anyone who knew him well would have any qualms about working with him, or give credence to what amounts to only crude “guilt by association.”
The jump from “association” to “partying” and then from “partying” to “complicit participation” is simply not supported by any credible facts or defensible logic. I think the idea of Chomsky sexually abusing young women and girls is painful to you — or you would not have referenced that notion in a poem. We should all be wary of those who would betray us or our values. We should especially beware of permitting such wariness to betray ourselves.
From Chat GPT:
There’s no credible evidence that Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein “partied” together in the sense of socializing at Epstein’s infamous island parties or being part of his sexual-abuse network — but there is documented evidence of contact and association between them. Here’s what is known from reliable reporting and released documents:
📌 Documented Interactions Between Chomsky and Epstein
1. Long-term correspondence and meetings:
Emails and other documents released by the U.S. House Oversight Committee show that Chomsky and Epstein were in regular contact for years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from an underage girl. In at least some of these communications, Chomsky described their exchanges as intellectually engaging. 
2. Shared photos and appearances in Epstein files:
Photographs from Epstein’s personal archive — released by Congress — include images of Chomsky with Epstein, including one reportedly showing them seated next to each other (e.g., on a plane). 
3. Transfers of funds via Epstein-linked accounts:
Financial records indicate that about $270,000 was transferred from an account connected to Epstein to Chomsky, which Chomsky later said involved moving around his own assets and did not come directly from Epstein. 
4. Scheduled meetings in Epstein’s calendar:
Epstein’s personal calendar — part of the released documents — lists planned meetings between Epstein and Chomsky in the mid-2010s, showing they were at least scheduled to meet socially and in professional contexts. 
📌 What There Isn’t Evidence For
•There’s no confirmed credible evidence that Chomsky attended the notorious Epstein island parties or participated in the sexual abuse network Epstein ran. The available photos and records show them in contact, but not participating in or facilitating Epstein’s criminal activities.
•Being pictured with Epstein or having meetings with him does not by itself prove wrongdoing — and many high-profile individuals appear in Epstein’s files without involvement in his crimes. 
🗓️ When and where the interactions took place
2015–2017 timeframe (post-Epstein conviction):
•Court-released documents and calendars from Epstein’s personal archives show scheduled meetings between Epstein and Noam Chomsky in 2015 and 2016 — years after Epstein had already been convicted (in 2008) of procuring a minor for prostitution. 
•One confirmed encounter took place in March 2015 at the Harvard office of mathematician Martin Nowak, where Epstein met with a group including Chomsky and Nowak. •Reports also mention multiple occasions in 2015–2016 where Epstein allegedly arranged logistics (e.g., flights) or meetings involving Chomsky and others — for example a planned dinner with director Woody Allen and his wife, though Chomsky cast doubt on whether that actually occurred. 
Locations inferred from reporting:
•Harvard University (Cambridge, MA) — the 2015 meeting. 
•Epstein’s private calendar engagements — likely included his Manhattan townhouse and possibly flights between cities, as suggested by the scheduling, though specifics aren’t all confirmed. 
•A Congress-released photo shows Chomsky with Epstein on a plane — but the date and destination remain undated in the public release. 
Importantly — and clarifying public confusion — there’s no verified evidence Chomsky attended Epstein’s private island parties or had social interactions in that context; his documented interactions were meetings and exchanges. 
⸻
🧠 What Chomsky has said in response
Chomsky’s own responses, across different times and forums, include the following themes:
1. Meetings were private or routine academic exchanges
•When asked by The Wall Street Journal, Chomsky flatly said his meetings with Epstein were “none of your business” before confirming that he knew him and that they met occasionally. He described their discussions as focused on politics and academics. 
2. Normalization of contact after conviction
•Chomsky argued that, in U.S. society, once someone has served a sentence, they “re-enter society under prevailing norms,” and that he didn’t see scientific or political discussions with a convicted offender as inherently inappropriate. 
3. Described the exchanges in a supportive way
•In one undated handwritten letter in the Epstein files, Chomsky reportedly called Epstein a “highly valued friend” and described their “regular contact” as “a most valuable experience,” praising Epstein for helping him understand aspects of the global financial system and recounting introductions Epstein arranged. 
4. Comments framed around intellectual liberty
•In earlier remarks before the latest document releases, Chomsky said he had met all sorts of people, including those convicted of serious crimes, and did not regret those meetings — positioning it as a matter of open intellectual engagement rather than endorsement of wrongdoing. 
🧠 Summary
So in short:
•Chomsky did know Epstein and maintained communication after Epstein’s 2008 conviction.
•Their association included emails, meetings, and shared appearances in released documents.
•There is no reliable evidence that Chomsky was part of Epstein’s party scene or his criminal sexual network.
My summary: ''You sleep with the fish, you stink like a fish.'' Chomsky's a fraud and always has been. He's always endorsed the ''official'' story of 9/11 and excoriated the 9/11 truthers. He also said those who declined the Covid poison should be ostracized from society. The BS excuse that it was acceptable to engage with Epstein, because Epstein paid his dues, ignores the fact that Epstein got a sweetheart deal and should have been jailed for life, or worse. Fuck Chomsky and the zio trojan horse he rode in on.
You have every right to be bitter and hateful.
You have every right to condemn somebody via guilt by association.
You have every right to passionately condemn everyone who does not conform to your criteria for purity.
But don’t think you are convincing.
Don’t imagine that you are logical.
And don’t pretend you are just.
I have no way of knowing the exact nature of anybody’s interactions or relationships to any other person. I have no way of knowing what Noam Chomsky “really” thought about Epstein. But I see no serious, substantial evidence to doubt Chomsky’s words about not holding someone’s misdeeds against them after they have been convicted and served their sentence. I can’t find any interesting hint about anything beyond the obvious (to me) conclusion that Chomsky had no way of knowing that Epstein continued (after being released from prison) to personally abuse young women and girls while using them as part of his very profitable and extensive influence network.
Noam Chomsky cannot now defend himself against such scurrilous and unfounded attacks. I have no qualms about suggesting that you should be ashamed of yourself for your own fraudulent “stinking thinking.”
Like I’ve said, you have every right to stew in your own fish juice.
Very well said, Joe. Thank you for confirming my rights! You have the right to remain a fanboy of Ringo Chomsky, too. My ''purity criteria'' is pretty simple in this case....don't hang around with the likes of Epstein!! Don't hide behind the ''justice'' system and pretend that you don't know what's going on with Epstein, Noam. You say that Chomsky ''had no way of knowing......'' That's nonsense. Chomsky had more connections than you can have ''any way of knowing,'' yet he couldn't find out that Epstein continued his malfeasance after ''being released from prison?'' Give yourself a break, Joe. Chomsky had a chance to ''defend himself'' before his mind flew the coop, and he failed magnificently. It's known as conscience avoidance. Stew on that.
Yes, I will maintain my admiration for Ringo and for Noam (who, on consideration of the facts, common decency and even of your criteria) has no need for any kind of defense.
We can just disagree and leave it alone.
That works. I will always admire Ringo as I was around when he invaded America on the Ed Sullivan shoe. Noam? Sorry, his legacy is permanently, irrevocably tarnished, imo. I get it....maybe he replied to one of your emails at one point, and you're forever grateful that he shined his grace on you. That's fine. It is what it is. Best wishes to you.
He was a real fascist prick over those injections. His insistence that Kennedy would have gone down the same path as LBJ with regard to Vietnam is intellectually bankrupt, as is his whole attitude towards 9/11. His “lesser of two evils” support for Dems like Hillary was disgraceful as well. (And I was once an avid reader and admirer of Chomsky).
I couldn't agree more. ( I was also an admirer once upon a time.)
Nonsense.
But read more.
Mary, for many of us, there exists a ProLife movement on the left very different than what exists on the right. Our ProLife movement has as a basis, not the wanton killing of unborn innocent fetuses, but the wanton killing of innocent people who get in the way of the Neoliberal agenda--much like the story of Gaza and the footprint of Zionism.
World wide politicians, royals and establishment must have been involved in the EPSTEIN SATANIC EVIL CULT! Many of those same people behind the CO'n'VID 2020 MURDER OF THE VULNERABLE AND ELDERLY and also making money. Add on the POISON JABS! Perfidious anuses only words to describe them!
That was disturbing,
Well done!
Shine on you crazy diamond.
Sorry, Caitlin, that Chomsky 'popped your cherry' (spoiled your innocence).
I was done with Chomsky years ago, MANY years ago.
Was it before...?
Don't remember when exactly that I had lost my trust in him, but he definitely lost my trust for good when he came out in support of the September 11th false flag.
Roughly, he argued that it couldn't be an inside job as the 10,000 people required to pull off a September 11th false flag could never all keep quiet.
Such a specious argument from a man who gained his fame from language theory.
Jeepers!