On AI And Consciousness
Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley):
Computer scientist and futurist Jaron Lanier made some comments on Vox’s The Gray Area podcast the other day that I’d like to make a quick observation about.
In the podcast, titled “Will AI become God? That’s the wrong question,” Lanier talks about how artificial “intelligence” has become a sort of quasi religion in Silicon Valley, complete with its own deity-like entity, and a kind of Armageddon-cult-like vision for our future.
Asked by host Sean Illing about people’s anxiety regarding AI and the possibility of human extinction, Lanier said many in Silicon Valley have come to view humanity as a mere birthing vessel for these new technologies, which will become our vastly superior replacement.
“What drives me crazy about this is that this is my world,” Lanier said. “I talk to the people who believe that stuff all the time, and increasingly, a lot of them believe that it would be good to wipe out people and that the AI future would be a better one, and that we should wear a disposable temporary container for the birth of AI. I hear that opinion quite a lot.”
“Wait, that’s a real opinion held by real people?” asked Illing.
“Many, many people,” Lanier replied.
This is obviously disturbing, but it’s also just plain bizarre, because it shows how little attention these people are paying to the phenomenon of consciousness.
AI isn’t conscious. Saying AI should replace humanity is the same as saying fire should replace humanity, or white noise static from old televisions should replace humanity. It’s not conscious. There’s nobody inside it. It’s just the dark, empty buzzing of machinery, unwitnessed and unexperienced by any perceiving being.
It says so much about the worldview of these weird Silicon Valley cultists that this isn’t obvious to them. They think AI would be a superior replacement for humanity because they’ve paid no attention to consciousness. They’ve paid no attention to consciousness because they’ve lived completely unexamined lives. They’ve never reflected on what it actually means to be a living being having sentient experiences in this world.
Consciousness means subjective experience. It’s the hearer of what’s heard, the seer of what’s seen, and the perceiver of thoughts. We can know consciousness exists by our own experience of it, and we can infer that other people and animals must also have it because they have so many similarities to us. There is absolutely no reason to assume that inanimate, inorganic matter is capable of consciousness besides blind faith religious belief.
You see this with the way many of these cultists say people will be able to one day achieve immortality by uploading their minds onto computers. Julian Assange has talked about this Silicon Valley religious belief in the past, saying the following at a 2017 video conference:
“I know from our sources deep inside those Silicon Valley institutions, they genuinely believe that they are going to produce artificial intelligences that are so powerful, relatively soon, that people will have their brains digitized, uploaded on these artificial intelligences, and live forever in a simulation, therefore will have eternal life. It’s a religion for atheists. They’ll have eternal life, and given that you’re in a simulation, why not program the simulation to have endless drug and sex orgy parties all around you. It’s like the 72 virgins, but it’s like the Silicon Valley equivalent.”
Computers aren’t conscious. Sure you might one day be able to replicate the contents of a human mind onto some sort of software, but it won’t be “you”, because it won’t be conscious. There’d be nobody experiencing it. It would just be ones and zeros, unilluminated by any perceiving awareness.
Consciousness is the only reason life has value. It’s the only reason anything matters. Otherwise life would just be physical materials getting whipped about by natural forces without anyone feeling, sensing or experiencing any part of it. Suffering wouldn’t matter because it’s not being felt or experienced. Joy wouldn’t matter because it’s not being felt or experienced. There’d be no good reason not to torture someone, because there wouldn’t be any conscious experience of pain. There’d be no good reason to love anyone, because there wouldn’t be any conscious experience of love. Consciousness is the only reason life is worth living.
There is no basis on which to believe AI will ever be conscious. Consciousness isn’t some minor detail that science will easily work out once it gets around to it; it’s an all-encompassing phenomenon which has always been a complete mystery to all scientific fields. Science has no idea what consciousness is or why it happens, much less how to replicate it. It’s the single most important and fundamental aspect of every second of our waking experience of life, yet it remains a complete unknown to all of science. And this somehow gets left out of so much of the conversation about the future of artificial “intelligence”.
I guess it’s possible to become so mind-identified that you really believe you are your thoughts, and that a machine which can generate digital “thoughts” much more efficiently would therefore be a superior sort of being. You have to have spent no time looking inward and examining what it is that’s able to perceive thoughts in the first place. You have to have spent no time in meditation decoupling your sense of identity from the chatter in your head. You must be completely asleep at the wheel of your own life.
These are people who have spent their entire lives listening to their thoughts, without ever once taking a moment to wonder who the listener is.
And these are the people who increasingly rule our world. These are the people inserting themselves into our political systems. These are the people deciding what we may and may not say to each other online. These are the people setting the trajectory for the future of our species. These weird little cultists who are so pervasively unaware of their own inner processes that consciousness does not even feature in their understanding of what life is and where it is headed.
Just something we should all be aware of.
______________
My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. Go here to find video versions of my articles. If you’d prefer to listen to audio of these articles, you can subscribe to them on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud or YouTube. Go here to buy paperback editions of my writings from month to month. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.
Bitcoin donations: 1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
Featured image via Adobe Stock.
What needs to be realized is that the type of people Caitlin mentions in this article are perfect examples of deluded "techno-geeks" and "futurists" - they truly are INSUFFERABLE people - they have NO training in ethics, morality, true data science, sociology, economics, and psychology. Many are simply immature "tech fan-boys" that don't really understand HOW technology is used and abused by TPTB, the global Capitalists, etc.
AI has amazing potential, but my opinion is that "humans are not yet evolved enough and not yet ready to utilize it appropriately and for the right purposes". Hence, AI is likely to become more of a "tool of oppression" and "capitalist accumulation" than the supposed "egalitarian values" that these "tech-geek" seem to think that AI will usher in.
Many tech people often seem to lose touch with reality (based on my personal experiences working with them) and they conflate the world of "adolescent wet dreams of tech-philia" with the "real world of real people and cause-and-effect relationships".
Most of these "tech people" have never faced REAL challenges in life - challenges like food and water scarcity, poverty, hunger, isolation and societal exploitation, marginalization and exclusion, and real fear.
Hence these "tech people" lack imagination (and hence often empathy) as they are unable to comprehend/envision/situationalize how the majority of the human population lives and survives.
Hence, the extent of the "imagination and creativity" of the "average tech person" focuses on impractical solutions and 'pie-in-the-sky' approaches to solving problems. The 1% (and other Capitalists) prey on these "naive tech geek" and co-opt their "good intentions" for increased surveillance and oppression and authoritarianism.
Someone needs to EDUCATE these "tech-geeks" on HOW they are being used as TOOLS to do the bidding of TPTB (eg. Elon Musk's DOGE team).
"They’ve paid no attention to consciousness because they’ve lived completely unexamined lives."
Every day, I run into yet another person who seems to be without any awareness of themselves, their own uniqueness, their own inner voice. This is where the Silicon Valley A.I. cultists must fit in. No one who has ever held a baby in their arms could ever think for one second that a machine could ever have a consciousness--or a conscience. Why and how could these unconscious programs (that's what they are really), programmed by people unaware of their own consciousness, be "superior" to flesh and blood human beings? Next thing you know, we'll be voting for a cell phone for president! (Might as well--it can't be any less human than the current one.)