111 Comments
User's avatar
Robert Billyard's avatar

There are back channel talks going on and what Stoltenberg says here is to soften the blow of a pending negotiated peace where NATO is going to have to make major concessions to Russia . The war has actually empowered Russia and it is in no mood to take any more crap from the West. Putin warned when negotiations broke down there could be "military consequences"-- and he is known as somebody who does not bluff.

The tragedy of this war is that it had to happen before the criminal dumb ass West could be forced to the negotiating table.

I consider this war a war crime. There should be tribunals but these will never happen. NATO deliberately plotted the destruction of Ukraine. From 2014 to 2022 it was preparing the Ukraine military for war against Russia. Zelensky was groomed for 3 years preparing him for his wicked role in this fiasco. He was elected president in 2019on the promise of peace. In April of 2022 he tried to open peace negotiations but British prime minister Boris Johnson was dispatched to Kiev to stop them.

Stoltenberg is a traitor to Europe but apparently most Europeans as gullible as they are don't see him as such.

SNAFU .... Situation Normal All Fucked Up( a popular military acronym)

I keep asking myself where is the outrage? It appears we are incapable of it.

Expand full comment
Kojo's avatar

Stoltenberg is a traitor to his own country of Norway.

It’s not only that at NATO he has put his own country in the crossfire and at risk of being ravaged on the frontline of conflict. But also as prime minster of Norway, he took a country that was previously a peacemaker and made them join in committing war crimes in Libya and Afghanistan.

Its disgusting. He is the new Quisling.

Expand full comment
Robert Billyard's avatar

It is also interesting to note that as a young activist he was opposed to the existence of NATO. ...Interesting how time, money, and power destroy so many souls.

Quisling of course was hung for his crimes.

Expand full comment
Kojo's avatar

“….Interesting how time, money, and power destroy so many souls….”

Not it’s not that. Those were his undercover days: a journalist recently let it slip that Slotenberg has long been an “asset”, going back to preicsely those days. He was reporting back on who was who in the anti-war movement in the youth ranks of the Norwegian labour party. So basically helping them compile dossiers on future political figures int he country, and figure out who was not bought into the war machine ideology.

Also as prime minister of Norway he very thoroughly cleaned out all actiual leftists from the Norwegian labour party and installed Støre the current prime minister as head of the party. Støre is heir of a billionaire family and a former member of the Norwegian conservative party.

He has been hard at work for Langley for many decades. And obviously then “rewarded” with the NATO head of propaganda job, Of course he is not in charge. of NATO. The Pentagon is.

Expand full comment
notBob's avatar

“It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. ”

― G.K. Chesterton

Expand full comment
Joe Van Steenbergen's avatar

People have been so thoroughly propagandized and hypnotized that they will do and believe anything the government (media) tells them to believe. If you think about it, that is an amazing feat of conditioning, one I never thought would have been possible among Western free-thinking people.

Expand full comment
Robert Billyard's avatar

Among the great revelations now is how heavily we have been bombarded by lies and propaganda over so many decades . We have also been seduced by so many weapons of mass distraction, political and social illiteracy, and ignorance of basic history-- so easily erased by our failing systems of education, the corporate infiltration of our universities and plain old apathy . Our bubbles of affluence are breeding grounds for complacency and despotism.

Expand full comment
The Talking Wombat's avatar

I agree wholeheartedly with you, Robert, and Joe, above. The conditioning happens throughout our lives starting when we are born. It pervades our culture. It takes work (reading, listening, discussing, and observing) throughout our lives to develop the skepticism needed to acknowledge that other realities are possible besides the one fed on a daily basis.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

"Stoltenberg is a traitor to Europe but apparently most Europeans as gullible as they are don't see him as such."

Europeans like being slaves.

Expand full comment
Robert Billyard's avatar

Its called the "Stockholm Syndrome" where people are hostage for so long they internalize the values of their captors. Canadians are really de facto Americans but we don't like to acknowledge our colonization and the high price we pay for it.

Expand full comment
Elisabeth's avatar

Well I beg to disagree, they are just as brainwashed by the stupid media as in the US (the red scare and the yellow peril is still burned on the harddrives of the people in addition to many other things that are simply LIES). It is 'grumbling' in the underground, but only if people are hungry and cannot afford anything anymore there will be riots ... (people are still living the 'good life' that is DETERIORATING quickly ... we will see ...)

Expand full comment
Elisabeth's avatar

Yes, thank you, VERY WELL said! I really hope this lunacy ends soon - all this pain and trauma that was created by this totally unnecessary war (the a...holes refused to 'at least' talk with Mr Putin - what ever happened to diplomacy?? How will they ever trust the West again - see f.i. the fake Minsk Agreements). Well regarding war crime - totally agree, but the only thing they want is drag Mr Putin to the ICC, which is simply ridiculous (there are so many worthy candidates) ... Yes and a Hurrah to SNAFU!

Expand full comment
CarbonCopy's avatar

Nato is literally made up of Nazis from Hitler's chief of staff to a bunch of others. Here is the link https://www.dispropaganda.com/single-post/2019/04/04/NATOs-secret-Nazi-past

Expand full comment
One Existence's avatar

"Stoltenberg is a traitor to Europe but apparently most Europeans as gullible as they are don't see him as such." ....

.... I beg to differ. THE TRUTH is never in a rush ... as Russia's COMPOSURE - which has nothing to do with the individuals involved - has shown. Being steadfast based on your convictions aiming for THE TRUTH - without rushing to conclusions >>>> actions has never failed.

Expand full comment
Letsrock's avatar

👍

Expand full comment
Another WorldView Is Possible's avatar

Jens Stoltenberg, gets CAUGHT - saying the quiet parts OUT LOUD.

Sure, it's only confirming what the reality-based-community already KNEW ... But it's nice to hear reality being acknowledged for a change.

Not only was the invasion of Ukraine PROVOKED... It was DELIBERATELY PROVOKED, by the rulers of the Empire, in DC, London and Brussels.

Just as the US was prepared to fight a Nuclear war, over Soviet Missiles in Cuba, just minutes from DC... So too, are the Russians ready to fight - to prevent the US from placing Nukes just minutes from Moscow.

It's sort of like then Ambassador Burns put it, in his famous email on the universal political orientation in Russia, across ALL political tendencies, on NATO Expansion into Ukraine and Georgia (thank you WikiLeaks) ... "Nyet means NYET!". If only the Monoparty's NeoCon Death Cult had listened.

Expand full comment
notBob's avatar

Not only DELIBERATELY PROVOKED but planned, war gamed and funded for decades before the war actually started. The US MIC has had its sights set on Russia for many decades, the US inner circle thought they had won with Yeltsin and the fall of the USSR and they had until Putin came back to power. The war is a long brewing hatred of Russia in material form.

Expand full comment
One Existence's avatar

" The war is a long brewing hatred of Russia in material form." ...

... I believe it goes back even further - millennia - and has its roots much deeper than "hatred of Russia" as it is only the LATEST MATERIAL PROXY on which THE HUMAN MIND vying for the conquest of LIFE itself - THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN - by BELIEVING in the fairy tale from THE GARDEN OF EDEN, where EVE convinced ADAM about LIFE being nothing but MATERIAL - ignoring that "IN BEGINNING WAS THE WORD ...." .... Roots in the very "spirit" that despises REALITY - THE TRUTH about ALL EXISTENCE - by continuing to believe in the above mentioned fairy tale of THE MATERIAL and therefore by extension having to amass constantly more "resources" - the latter being a fairy tale in and of itself - in an ETERNAL SELF-SUSTAINING CREATION having its beginnings in THE MIND itself...

Expand full comment
notBob's avatar

for my part I will stick with what has happened during my life for reference, anything else is just asking someone else to think for me.

Expand full comment
One Existence's avatar

... everyone to his own taste ... but certainly looking at the "carrot in front of one's nose" ONLY is quite a fallacious approach in MY OPINION to the vastness of EXISTENCE ... but still better HONEST with limited scope than BOASTFUL based on a BIG (SELF)-DECEPTION!

13Then were there brought unto him little children, that he should put his hands on them, and pray: and the disciples rebuked them. 14But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven. 15And he laid his hands on them, and departed thence.

Matt 19, 13-15

Expand full comment
Jack Lomax's avatar

Western War propaganda has a long history. My father who fought and was injured in WW1 told me as WW2 was looming not to believe the war propaganda he had about how evil the Germans were in doing things like ripping babies out of their mothers and dashing on the ground ;or raping nuns and then killing them etc etc. So when the second chapter WW2 arrived I was more sceptical and long after the war had ended I managed to research some of the English war propaganda I had been subjected to. And found like my father before me truth is the first causality of capitalism's wars .Same thing when I was conscripted into. the royal air force and told we were bombing North Korea because they were evil. George Orwell would have been pleased to see how accurate 1984 is.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Lord Posonby's Ten Commandments of War Propaganda:

1. We don’t want war, we are only defending ourselves.

2. Our adversary is solely responsible for this war.

3. Our adversary’s leader is inherently evil and resembles the devil.

4. We are defending a noble cause, not our particular interests.

5. The enemy is purposefully committing atrocities; if we are making mistakes this happens without intention.

6. The enemy makes use of illegal weapons.

7. We suffer few losses, the enemy’s losses are considerable.

8. Recognized intellectuals and artists support our cause.

9. Our cause is sacred.

10. Whoever casts doubt on our propaganda helps the enemy and is a traitor.

Expand full comment
Thom Williams's avatar

@ Feral Finster✔🎯

As a registered agnostic I really appreciate the sentiment of this good Lord's Ten Commandments❗ Thank you for posting it, and I hope you don't mind my having printed a copy for future use👍,

As Usual,

EA☠

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

How could I mind? It's not even my original work.

Expand full comment
Thom Williams's avatar

🎭Sorry for the belated response...I missed the notice of your reply😴

My thought regarding your possibly minding something pertaining to my future intention to "use" the list, was not due to any misperception that your attribution did not defray any thought of plagiarization on your part⁉

As Usual,

EA😎

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

No worries. Cats have no use for intellectual property, anyway.

Expand full comment
Thom Williams's avatar

Hmmm❔ 🐱‍👤or🐱‍👓

By the way, I rather enjoyed you tack on the BRICS subject further ⬇this thread; particularly your referencing of the work and opinions of Andrew Korybko and Elvira Naibullina.

As Usual,

EA💲🗑

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 9, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Jack Lomax's avatar

Thank you. But he had to grow in wisdom through four years of blood and mud surrounded by the dead and the dying. He volunteered as a 17 year old posing as a 18year old and four years later he came out of it as a deafened and disillusion (but not bitter) man having turned 21 near to Armistice day (11/11/ 1918) in the trenches -the then age of the beginning of manhood.

Expand full comment
Gary's avatar

Caitlin is in the unenviable position of trying to stem a tidal wave of corrupted journalism with but few that stand with her.

Expand full comment
Greg Connolly's avatar

Keep pushing and Posting!

Expand full comment
Sari Tähtinen's avatar

Thank you Caitlin🙏

Expand full comment
unwarranted's avatar

This proxy war has gifted American sheep the opportunity to wake up and smell the bullshit.

When a superpower taunts and mocks and belittles and provokes a former superpower, that is righteous. When the recipient of the superpower’s audacious behavior responds defensively, that is aggression! Nowhere in any court of law, anywhere on the planet can such utter nonsense be upheld or ruled acceptable.

This divide in the American society where a ludicrous narrative can be swallowed is a microcosm of the pretentious American Experiment.

Most people that I know believe that the first European immigrants didn’t arrive with a thought of adapting to the indigenous population, but saw that power and violence and killing could eventually force the indigenous people to adapt to the new arrivals...or die.

But very few people that I know believe that the American government is wrong to take that same mindset in its interactions with other governments. So the genocide of our founders gives our leaders license to follow no international laws, engage in murder and theft and occupation and dictatorship, and such license is extended to no other nation.

This fallacious patriotism is a great test for our age of social media. Of course the SM is dominated by the false narratives of the imperial power, but whereas those narratives were previously largely uncontested, now they are forced to adapt to the truth, and the acts of censorship, eliminating platforms for communication, smearing truth tellers, is ample evidence that speech isn’t free, and it never was!

So anybody who cares about waking up the American sheep can support the truth tellers that are making the imperialists nervous. Small contributions for many folks can keep a lot of good people doing good work.

Expand full comment
SerenityFern's avatar

Everything you need to see and hear is out there, there are no conspiracy theories. Everything is happening in plain sight and we keep being told not to believe our own eyes. Our natural instincts and sensors are being blunted and confused by awful people on power trips.

Expand full comment
includeMeOut's avatar

There is a pandemic of “Not Sees”.

Expand full comment
James Charles's avatar

From someone who 'knows'?

“Because the US intelligence and military leaders are looking at the war in Ukraine through this prism, the analysts and their managers, for the most part, face enormous pressure to conclude that Russia is a feckless and incompetent near-peer adversary and cannot last.

I continue to believe that the assumptions about Russia’s alleged failure is ignoring the contravening narrative:

The Russian economy is robust and healthy despite Western sanctions.

Russia’s political influence in the world is growing, not shrinking. BRICS is a case in point.

Russia is inflicting enormous casualties on Ukraine’s military and decimating infrastructure critical to the Ukrainian military campaign.

Russia’s defense industry has ramped up to levels of production that the West cannot match.

Russia’s seemingly unlimited access to natural resources, energy and rare earth minerals strengthens Russia’s military position in the world.

Russia enjoys a massive technological advantage over NATO in terms of electronic warfare, air defense systems, mine laying vehicles and hypersonic missiles.

Russian leaders and their people genuinely believe they face an existential threat from the West.

Ukraine is totally dependent on the West to provide money and weapons to continue to fight.”?

https://sonar21.com/u-s-intelligence-community-sending-mixed-messages-on-ukraine/#comment-153879

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

The problem Russia faces is that, short of a nuclear strike, there is nothing Russia can do that so much as mildly inconveniences the decisionmakers in the West, or even their puppets in Kiev.

Therefore, the West will continue to escalate.

Expand full comment
Elisabeth's avatar

YES, that is what I am afraid of: more and more escalation - what will Mr Putin (who certainly has is own warmongers and warhawks to deal with) do? I am not looking forward to a totally destroyed poisoned Europe and I do not believe that you can 'win a nuclear war' (as the WSJ said months ago ... 'We should show that ...'). I want to repeat an advice of Col. MacGregor: Make Peace You Fools!

Expand full comment
Thom Williams's avatar

@ Elisabeth👀

You might consider looking into the use of the "Depleted Uranium" weapons being provided to the Ukrainian military by NATO member nations with regards to the possibility of a future "totally destroyed poisoned Europe"⁉

As Usual,

EA☠

Expand full comment
Elisabeth's avatar

I know all that, but thanks! THIS is a WarCrime ... anybody seen these horrible pix of children in Basra?? (not to talk about the soldiers that were exposed to it, with which I mean 'our good guys' ... sorry that is mean, but the US has no conscription anymore, so it is 'sort of' voluntary ... what I really mean is: WAR IS A CRIME)

Expand full comment
Thom Williams's avatar

@ Elisabeth🎭

Indeed Ms. Elisabeth, starting wars is criminal behavior. My reply to you was a failed attempt to address the specific innuendo you offered regarding the hypothetical "destroyed poisoned Europe" that might result from Mr. Putin and his "warmongers and warhawks" initiating the use of nuclear weaponry. Beings you "know all that" do forgive my intrusion into your unobstructed and intellectually focused space🧘‍♀️.

But thanks to you as well.👍

As Usual,

EA☠

Expand full comment
Elisabeth's avatar

No intrusion ... Peace!! Who started most wars or conflicts or ... the US (and next come the colonialists ...) - I am an Austrian citizen and do not want to live my country destroyed (I lived thru the Cold War with the NATO threat of the use of tactical nukes ... so my motto was then: better red than dead). Best to you!

Expand full comment
Remsomm's avatar

Russia is doing the following:

- strengthening direct cooperation ties with China,their neighbour, huge energy investment projects

- diplomatically strengthening ties around the globe and punting mutual benefit, unlike US

- slowly but surely getting all the main oil producing countries on their side, BRICS+ 38% of world production

-clobbering together a finacial alternative to the SWIFT payment system, backed by bullion

- cleverly leveraging Turkey out of NATO, just wait and see

- degrading US influence in Africa

- successfully managing a war on a 1000km frontline, to the great chagrin of the masters of Jens Stoltenberg and Joe Biden

- making sure they militarise the arctic sphere before you-know-who thinks it belongs to them

Geopolitical changes take time and huge patience and loads of work. You can't 'swing the vote' if you don't offer an alternative to the status quo.

If you have time listen to the Valdai Discussion Club. It's to the point, unlike Western discussions.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

If you read Andrew Korybko and the like, or for that matter, Elvira Naibullina (head of the Russian Central Bank), you may note that all are much more subdued on what BRICS is and what it is intended to and can accomplish.

Expand full comment
Remsomm's avatar

Agreed, but better to start somewhere than to bemoan the current situation and do nothing about it. Likening it to a war situation: the Western powers are pretty darn well entrenched in their World Bank, IMF, SWIFT systems, and they do weaponize them.

Tough years ahead, but certainly preferable to a nuclear exchange, wouldn't you agree?

I'm certainly not one of those that dismiss the clout Western powers/countries/institutions have. Russia and China are definitely not in the seat of power. Otherwise we would be writing in Cyrillic/Mandarin... :)

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

Now I agree that something must be done.

I question whether the BRICS leadership really has the stomach to do it.

Expand full comment
Literally Mussolini's avatar

(This is an assessment of the general state of the BRICS, which I posted a few days ago.)

All the BRICS realize the danger posed by the US Empire and are opposed to it, but they fall into two general blocs as to how they play the global situation:

1. China, Russia, and now Iran are in a bloc of declared Empire enemies. They share an interest in working together to directly oppose the Empire.

2. The others, led by India and Brazil, are nominally "neutral" (or in the case of Saudi Arabia, still nominally an Empire "ally"). While having long-term incentives to work with the enemies bloc to ensure that they are free from control of (and possible punishment by) the Empire, this bloc does have incentives to advance its short-term interests by playing between the Empire and the Enemies. This will make the work of the BRICS as a unified force to oppose the global hegemony of the Empire a task requiring careful diplomacy.

A particular area in which we can observe this difficulty is in the formation of financial systems outside those controlled by the Empire. After seeing what was done to Russia, every BRIC nation (and any others currently outside the Empire) have been put on notice that they need to take action to develop systems that protect themselves from the possibility of having the same happen to them. But the pseudo-neutral nations need to advance carefully to avoid being placed in the Enemies bloc before they are ready to fully defend their interests against the Empire.

Expand full comment
Doris Wrench Eisler's avatar

Stoltenberg would have to make that admission -or go down in history as a fool or charlatan. But he likely opines that in spite of that background, Russia still didn't have the moral right to embark on denazification of Ukraine, if he even believes Nazis were running the show in that corrupt country.

Expand full comment
Letsrock's avatar

He's the warmonger not Putin. NATO needs to be disbanded.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

'NATO! what is it good for? Absolutely nothing (apart from war mongering and making lots of money for Raytheon)'

Expand full comment
Niclas Hallander's avatar

I see what you did there. 😉FGTH had a couple of awesome covers/songs. War, Two Tribes, The Power of Love...

But, maybe you referred to the original? Oops. Oh well, funny all the same...

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

I knew of Frankie's version first but Edwin Starr's committed vocal on the original is superb. The 12 inch of Frankie's banging Two Tribes is very prescient and still gives me goose bumps like the first time I heard it (apologies if you boycott youtube) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnh7x8aU26g

Expand full comment
Doris Wrench Eisler's avatar

Yes, we should concentrate on that: NATO the war monger.

Expand full comment
denmla's avatar

hmm, psychopaths are loosing it!....

Expand full comment
Andrew Thomas's avatar

Amen, Caitlin, with a few caveats. Stoltenberg is telling only a partial truth here. There is far more in the way of ‘provocation’ than just Ukraine joining NATO. At the risk of being accused of ‘parroting Kremlin narratives’- which I am not; any duplication of these truths by Putin or other members of the Russian government is simply evidence that Putin and/or the Russian government is telling the truth. With that out of the way, off we go:

1. The putsch regime in Kiev came to power by and through the decades long efforts of the US Empire to bring Ukraine into the empire. Nuland has openly bragged about how much money the US has spent over DECADES to bring about the atrocity which is the government of Ukraine since 2014. It conspired with the Nazis who largely inhabit western Ukraine to get it done.

2. Nuland and the US ‘ambassador’ to Ukraine (who now holds that post in Athens; God help the Greeks) were caught on a taped telephone conversation before the coup was over picking the people who were going to be in charge of the putsch regime. Lo and behold, they were precisely the US tools who were put in charge. Quelle surpris! Not.

3. Immediately, the new regime abandoned its constitutional commitment to neutrality, and banned the Russian language in the entire country, including Donetsk and Lugansk, which is the only language the vast majority of the residents there speak.

4. Crimea is a special case. The ban on Russian applied there as well. But, 20 years plus earlier, its residents voted in a referendum to remain in the Russian Federation. Ukraine paid no attention, and marched in. Russia had been too weakened to help Crimea resist, but retained its key port in Sevastopol, by some sort of arrangement with the Ukrainian government.

4. It was clear that said arrangement was going to go away, creating for Russia an immediate existential threat- the takeover of the Black Sea and Russia’s only reliable warm-water port- by the US Empire. So, at the invitation of the vast majority of people in Crimea, Russia took military action to make certain that did not occur.

5. This made Nuland & Company hopping mad, as this was the primary initial goal of installing the putsch regime. The 2d referendum held in Crimea, unsurprisingly, turned out exactly the way the first one did 20 years earlier.

6. Incidentally, although I have not seen any comments on this before, the fact that the putsch took place at the exact same time as the Winter Olympics in Sochi could not have been accidental. The fact that Russia held them was owlshit stupid, but the fact that they have been held at all anywhere- summer and winter- ever since world championships in all of the events in the Games became routine is owlshit stupid.

7. To the extent that the Nazi militias in Ukraine were not already trying to commit obvious genocide on the Russian people living in Donetsk and Lugansk, those efforts began in earnest immediately.

8. An agreement was made to establish a federal structure in the ‘new’ Ukraine that would guarantee that the people in Donetsk and Lugansk would be allowed to live in peace and use their own language. That agreement was agreed with France and Germany as guarantors. It was not paid the least attention by the putsch regime. The people of Donetsk and Lugansk declared their independence, and asked to become a part of the Russian Federation.

9. Putin refused, continuing his, as he has as much as admitted, pointless ‘diplomacy’ with the Empire. It took the public statements of Germany and France that their participation in the agreement above referenced was entirely in bad faith- after the war began in earnest- to convince him how foolish he had been.

10. However, Putin and Lavrov continued to beat that dead horse until it became clear that the Ukrainian army, led now by the Nazis with whom the US for so long supported, was on the verge of a major offensive to de-Russianize the two breakaway provinces. This was after 9 years of efforts to do the same thing that resulted in at least 11,000 deaths of the residents there, and untold devastation.

11. The Russian army began to move closer to Ukraine in response, prompting the U.S. to start predicting an ‘invasion’.

12. At the same time, the Russian Duma, under significant pressure from their constituents to finally DO SOMETHING, passed overwhelmingly what we call legislation that had the twofold purpose of recognizing the breakaway republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, and heeding their desperate requests for help, and Putin finally approved it.

13. At that point, as the Ukrainians were beginning their version of the final solution of the ‘Russian problem’ in Ukraine, Russia ‘invaded’.

14. It is critical to realize that there are huge numbers of people in Russia who think of themselves as Russian who have lots of relations among people who think of themselves as Russian who live in Ukraine. The disinformation manufactured by Nuland & Co. that ordinary Russians cared not a fig about any of this, that it was all ‘Putin’ could not be further from the truth.

15. Ukraine couldn’t keep the lights on without the continuous funneling of cash for that purpose coming from the Empire. It is, for all practical purposes, a part of NATO now. Or, if you prefer, a NATO stooge.

16. Scandinavia had become neoliberal tools of the Empire a while back. It’s official embrace of the Empire had been unofficial for a while; in some cases, a long while. Very little has changed, if you look at it through any Russian eyes.

17. The importance of Ukraine’s push to join NATO means little, in and of itself. It is critical to Russia because of what it signaled- the beginning of the long-held Empire fantasy of destroying Russia. Not just effecting ‘regime change’ as in Putin being gone, but the breakup of the Russian Federation itself, dividing the spoils (so the pathetic Western Europeans hope) with them. I’ve seen the maps these lunatics drew up in places where official US military policy is set forth and discussed. PUBLICLY. This is no secret. A commitment from Ukraine not to join NATO would have signaled to Russia that the Empire was at least considering backing away. Even then, it took the impending slaughter on an industrial scale of its compatriots in Ukraine for Russia to finally do what it did in Crimea 8 years earlier. By then, it was clear that the risks posed to it and its people were as existential as the loss of access to the Black Sea would have been in 2014.

I have nothing but the highest regard for Chris Hedges and Noam Chomsky. They have been leaders in fighting for Justice for, combined, well over 100 years. However, I respectfully disagree with them when they say, though the ‘invasion’ was massively provoked, that it was unjustified. If there has ever been a ‘justified’ use of military force, this was it. And, because of the sequence of events described above, there is more than a fig leaf’s evidence that it wasn’t an invasion at all. It was an intervention on behalf of two independent republics that were in extremis and at their long-pending requests.

That went a little longer than I imagined it might. But, as always, well done, Caitlin.

Expand full comment
Thom Williams's avatar

@ Andrew Thomas🎯

I respectfully agree with your substantive analysis in most part and your regardful opinion of Chris Hedges, Noam Chomsky, and Caitlin Johnstone, as far as their respective atavistic pursuits of humane justice is concerned. Your excellent synopsis, in my opinion too brief👀, avoided addressing some of the "alternative facts" that opposing narratives, like those of creatures like "Victoria Nuland & Company" and their stenographers in the corporate media, have injected into the current public misunderstanding of the circumstances that your narrative portends to explain. For instance, NATO member's serious violations of international treaties that endanger national border integrity🤷‍♂️😴; One of the very international war-crimes Putin is accused of committing⁉

Anyway, thank you for using your voice of reason; to few do in this time of petty social political avarice and petulant malignant narcissism❗

As Usual,

EA☠

Expand full comment
Andrew Thomas's avatar

Thank you. Very kind words, and I greatly appreciate them.

Expand full comment
chris leeds's avatar

it's very similar to the UK where criticising the state of Israel is routinely labelled as anti-semitism with the direct aim of shutting down criticism

Expand full comment
Andrew Thomas's avatar

And in the US. And the Jews who no longer support Israel’s savagery against the Palestinians have become “self-hating Jews”, a horrendously abusive term that IMHO is a lot worse than calling goyim ‘antisemitic’. And the so-called ‘evangelicals’ in the US, who are REALLY, REALLY, REALLY anti-semites? They are all just fine with the Israeli propagandists because they are 100% behind Israel. Why is this so? For tactical reasons. In what passes for their minds, Israel and their support of it will start a chain of events that will result in Armageddon, during which EVERY JEW and so many others will be given a choice between conversion to their idea of Christianity, accompanied by eternal life in the company of Jesus, or refusal to do so, which will result in immediate death and eternity in the bowels of hell.

If Lewis Carroll and Jonathan Swift were alive today, their heads would explode. And the times THEY lived in were AWFUL.

Expand full comment
Robert the Skeptic's avatar

I just did a search of the NYT and was surprised not to find any mention of Stoltenberg’s statement. Just kidding. ;>) The Times and other western propaganda rags know what to print and what not to print without being told.

Expand full comment
Mark Chapman's avatar

The situation is actually a little worse, a little more brazen than described - because admitting a new member to NATO is expected to positively affect the overall security of the alliance. One of the criteria for NATO admission is that doing so would materially enhance the security of NATO as a whole.

Would it be considered an enhancement of NATO security for the admission of a new member to be promised, in writing, to kick off at a minimum a major regional conflict, with the very real possibility that the entire alliance would be dragged into it? I don't see how any reasoning individual would think so. Yet NATO went ahead with it, snickering the whole time because they were 'making Moscow fume' and throwing up ridiculous canards that implied anyone could join NATO if they wished. Russia itself proposed joining NATO, more than once, and was not only soundly rebuffed, it was made clear that no such accommodation would ever be made. I don't doubt that if the west realized its dream of breaking Russia up into 'manageable' ethnic republics, it would be pleased to admit those to NATO one by one. But the whole country as an undivided entity? Never.

The admission of Ukraine not only would not materially enhance NATO security, it guaranteed a war of unknown magnitude with a nuclear power that has not lost a war in recent memory, a country that reacted violently to measures intended to broaden the influence of NATO in its constituent republics as recently as 2008. On that occasion, frantic diplomatic measures had to be employed to prevent the pursuit of fleeing Georgians taking the advancing Russian forces to the gates of Tbilisi itself. Yet the chucklers and mockers in the west apparently learned nothing.

Perhaps the process of acquired wisdom has deteriorated in the west to the extent that it will take an event like a major world land war fought across the breadth and length of Europe, with damage and devastation that cannot now be realistically imagined to reawaken it. It'd be nice if those who keep beckoning it onward were the first killed, but they never are.

Expand full comment
Joe Van Steenbergen's avatar

No amount of shame or pointing out the obvious duplicitous behavior will deflect the West from its course. World domination is essential to their ability to use and abuse the world's resources for oligarchic domination; nothing else matters.

Expand full comment