Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley): Everyone says they want peace, but they mean different things by this. To an anti-imperialist, peace means the end of violence, oppression and exploitation. To a Zionist, peace means Palestinians lie down and accept their fate and neighboring nations cease disobeying Israel. To a supporter of the US empire, peace means all nations around the world submit to US unipolar hegemony. Many say they want peace when what they really want is tyranny.
I’d just like to comment on the idea that Israel is ‘losing the information war’ in Gaza. In my opinion this is accepting Israel’s framing of the issue in a subtle way. As they put it in the article shown, Hamas has a ‘well oiled psychological and information warfare machine’. But this isn’t true of course. What is happening is people around the world are bearing witness the a mass slaughter in their name, and they don’t like it. Only a psychopath would think that there must be a comms strategy behind posting pictures of dead children and saying ‘stop this madness’. There is no ‘information war’: there is information, and then there is propaganda. If Israel stopped producing dumb videos of tunnels under hospitals and their soldiers spent less time on tiktok goofing around the ruins of homes and schools they had just destroyed, maybe they wouldn’t be quite so reviled. But ultimately, there just isn’t a way to murder thousands of men, women and children that looks good. Stop killing people, there’s your comms strategy.
> This would be true if it’d been a Mormon state or a Romani state.
Sure, but neither the Mormons nor the Romani demanded their own state, and they did not have a $multi trillion backer like the Rothschild dynastic empire.
> You’re also going to see the dominant group espouse supremacist ideological beliefs to justify why it’s fine for them to be placed above the other group and receive better treatment by the state.
As happened in Germany from 1933-45. The exact same thing has happened in Palestine, except that the supremacists infested Palestine from outside the region and had absolutely no ties to Palestine.
> The religions and ethnicities are interchangeable
That only applies to the Jews as they are the only group in the world who claim to be a race (when Hitler said that he was a racist) and a religion, and they use the 2 principles interchangeably depending on the narrative being spewed. The fact is that the Jews are NOT a race, they make up a religion and a certain culture.
> The anti-interventionist position for an American to have is to demand that the Biden administration stop actively facilitating this mass atrocity.
That is the theory. In practice, demanding this is now labeled as "anti-Semitism", and still too many people buy that racist BS.
“…. The Biden administration’s justifications for its acts of war in Yemen are premised on the absurd assumption that the world economy should march on completely uninhibited during an active genocide…..”
Well notably, a week ago at the World Economic Forum at Davos, which is run by the economic elite that pay Biden…..they platformed Mr Zelensky to play pretend solider, claim he wants peace, and promise to hand over his country for free to “investors”:
But the same WEF elite at Davos …had NO place the leader of Hamas nor the leader of Fatah or any other palestinian organization. And they did it while even trawling out shamen and all sorts of native people. But the palestinians - crickets?
Why? Because ALL the colonial elite of the USA and Europe indeed ALL believe that the world economy should go undisturbed during THEIR active, full-scale invasion genocide of palestine. Thus they attack the Yemeni’s….while giving the Israeli murder regime weapons ships and money to blockade Gaza since 2007!
"Know how you can tell it no longer matters who the US president is? They stopped getting assassinated."
I'm beginning to wonder if they EVER mattered. As long as the oligarchy has their way, the president stays in office. If the president starts acting up like he has his own ideas, they have to get rid of him. I think nowadays they don't want to waste bullets so they just wait until they self-destruct like Biden is doing. He's going down as "Genocide Joe" forever and taking all the attention away from the MIC and focusing it on himself. That's his job, apparently. What an idiot sociopath.
The Russia’s foreign minister has reiterated Moscow’s support for Palestinian statehood, and announced plans to present proposals to resolve the crisis in the Middle East at the United Nations Security Council next week. How will Arab World respond to Russia’s overtures? Sputnik asked a veteran Saudi foreign affairs observer.
"Israel isn’t relentlessly murderous and abusive because it’s run by Jews, it’s relentlessly murderous and abusive because that’s the only way to maintain an ethnostate that was abruptly dropped on top of an already existing civilization. This would be true if it’d been a Mormon state or a Romani state."
So true. And this is why supporting the Palestinians is not anti-Jewish, it's anti-genocide. The Israeli/Zionist Jews have (by and large, not universally) become poster children for the saying "Hurt people hurt people." This must stop.
"These things would happen regardless of what those respective ethnic and religious makeups happen to be."
Right, now watch Jew-haters flood the comments with their "expert" brain-farting insisting it's Jews and Judaism, and not Israel, that's at the core of the problem. Those are to be saluted with Heil Hitler!
"Pay less attention to people’s words about wanting “peace” and focus instead on what actions they are supporting to accomplish that end. This will show you the truth about what they really want."
That reminds me of how you should look closely at anyone who accuses another of antisemitism. What are they really saying? I made these notes today:
--
I'm sick of being told lies. Two facts.
1. Anyone who accuses another person of antisemitism is racist.
2. Any organisation adopting the IHRA definition of antisemitism is institutionally racist.
Firstly, Judaism is only one of the Semitic cultures. "Semitic" refers to Aramaic, Arabic, and Hebrew. Arabs, Ethiopians, and Arameans are also Semitic cultures yet are excluded from inclusion or protection under the term "antisemitism". It erases their voices and rights and only focusses on one culture, Judaism. The term antisemitism (as bandied around) is already fundamentally racist. It appropriates other cultures and silences vulnerable voices. It is primarily used to silence criticism of Israel's murderous actions: apartheid, genocide, illegal occupation, land theft. Israel was artificially created in 1948 (with full support from the English) amidst bloodshed and injustice against those whose land was stolen. Palestinians (as Arabs) are just as Semitic as Jews, yet those flinging racist accusations of antisemitism always exclude Palestinians (and every other Semitic culture) from their concern. Thus, to accuse someone of antisemitism is to reveal your inherent racism. Tories and Labour are both openly racist in the way they try to weaponise this controversial (and meaningless) term.
Secondly, if a definition needs "adopting" it is a warning sign that it is politically controversial. Heed that. We don't have to "adopt" a definition of racism, sexism or ageism because the meaning is unambiguous and clear. Racism is prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of skin colour or where someone was born. Sexism is prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of sex. Ageism is prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of age. We don't need to "adopt" anything.
Likewise the concept can be applied to belief systems. Anti-Christian (prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of someone being Christian), anti-Paganism (prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of someone being Pagan), anti-Judaism (prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of someone being Jewish). No definition needs adopting unless there is something suspicious going on. And you don't have to look far for what is being covered up. The controversial IHRA definition excludes the majority of Semitic cultures when it tries to define antisemitism. In this case it is an attempt to stifle criticism of Israel/Zionism by trying to falsely equate Israel with Judaism. Israel is not Judaism, as most Jews around the world will tell you - look up Jewish Voice for Peace to see how opposed many Jews are to Israel and its apartheid/genocide. The IHRA definition is a racist attempt to manipulate perceptions and politics and stifle criticism of Israel so that Palestinians can be erased from history, as is happening while I type this. It's why many claims of "the rise of antisemitism" are completely misleading, as legitimate criticism of the Israeli apartheid and genocide end up being falsely classed as antisemitic, when they are actually calls for justice and peace. The controversial IHRA definition of antisemitism means many peaceful Jews are classified as antisemitic, which shows how broken, corrupt and misleading this definition is.
I propose two things. One: any organisation that adopted the controversial IHRA definition of antisemitism should repeal it immediately, because to keep it is to promote racism, and only illustrates that the organisation supports genocide and apartheid. That includes DG Council. Two: any time you hear someone accuse another person of antisemitism, you should shout "Awa an boil yer heid, ya racist bam". Particularly if they are a politician. The concept of antisemitism is fundamentally racist. If you mean anti-Judaism, be specific and say that.
Actually, the rulers don't really want wars. They want submission from and enslavement of the rest of the world. Hence all those other means they keep exploring - AI, covid, social media zombification, digital tracking, divide and conquer along various fake notions, etc.
In that regard those who keep resisting via necessarily resorting to military means - Palestinians, other Middle Easterners, Russia - are really a big inconvenience and the nuisance for the elites. One can look at the fact armed resistance is still very much alive as the sign of the rulers' failing.
“Know how you can tell it no longer matters who the US president is? They stopped getting assassinated.”
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
‘Peace’ without Dignity is a Farce.
The Resistance knows this, which is why they fight for the Palestinians & their rights.
Liberation is the only acceptable outcome.‘Peace’ that lacks dignity is not worth having!
I’d just like to comment on the idea that Israel is ‘losing the information war’ in Gaza. In my opinion this is accepting Israel’s framing of the issue in a subtle way. As they put it in the article shown, Hamas has a ‘well oiled psychological and information warfare machine’. But this isn’t true of course. What is happening is people around the world are bearing witness the a mass slaughter in their name, and they don’t like it. Only a psychopath would think that there must be a comms strategy behind posting pictures of dead children and saying ‘stop this madness’. There is no ‘information war’: there is information, and then there is propaganda. If Israel stopped producing dumb videos of tunnels under hospitals and their soldiers spent less time on tiktok goofing around the ruins of homes and schools they had just destroyed, maybe they wouldn’t be quite so reviled. But ultimately, there just isn’t a way to murder thousands of men, women and children that looks good. Stop killing people, there’s your comms strategy.
> This would be true if it’d been a Mormon state or a Romani state.
Sure, but neither the Mormons nor the Romani demanded their own state, and they did not have a $multi trillion backer like the Rothschild dynastic empire.
> You’re also going to see the dominant group espouse supremacist ideological beliefs to justify why it’s fine for them to be placed above the other group and receive better treatment by the state.
As happened in Germany from 1933-45. The exact same thing has happened in Palestine, except that the supremacists infested Palestine from outside the region and had absolutely no ties to Palestine.
> The religions and ethnicities are interchangeable
That only applies to the Jews as they are the only group in the world who claim to be a race (when Hitler said that he was a racist) and a religion, and they use the 2 principles interchangeably depending on the narrative being spewed. The fact is that the Jews are NOT a race, they make up a religion and a certain culture.
> The anti-interventionist position for an American to have is to demand that the Biden administration stop actively facilitating this mass atrocity.
That is the theory. In practice, demanding this is now labeled as "anti-Semitism", and still too many people buy that racist BS.
“…. The Biden administration’s justifications for its acts of war in Yemen are premised on the absurd assumption that the world economy should march on completely uninhibited during an active genocide…..”
Well notably, a week ago at the World Economic Forum at Davos, which is run by the economic elite that pay Biden…..they platformed Mr Zelensky to play pretend solider, claim he wants peace, and promise to hand over his country for free to “investors”:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/01/zelenskyy-ukraine-business-investment-davos/
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/16/world/europe/ukraine-zelensky-davos-switzerland-peace.html
But the same WEF elite at Davos …had NO place the leader of Hamas nor the leader of Fatah or any other palestinian organization. And they did it while even trawling out shamen and all sorts of native people. But the palestinians - crickets?
Why? Because ALL the colonial elite of the USA and Europe indeed ALL believe that the world economy should go undisturbed during THEIR active, full-scale invasion genocide of palestine. Thus they attack the Yemeni’s….while giving the Israeli murder regime weapons ships and money to blockade Gaza since 2007!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockade_of_the_Gaza_Strip
"Know how you can tell it no longer matters who the US president is? They stopped getting assassinated."
I'm beginning to wonder if they EVER mattered. As long as the oligarchy has their way, the president stays in office. If the president starts acting up like he has his own ideas, they have to get rid of him. I think nowadays they don't want to waste bullets so they just wait until they self-destruct like Biden is doing. He's going down as "Genocide Joe" forever and taking all the attention away from the MIC and focusing it on himself. That's his job, apparently. What an idiot sociopath.
The Russia’s foreign minister has reiterated Moscow’s support for Palestinian statehood, and announced plans to present proposals to resolve the crisis in the Middle East at the United Nations Security Council next week. How will Arab World respond to Russia’s overtures? Sputnik asked a veteran Saudi foreign affairs observer.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20240118/russias-push-for-palestinian-state-can-help-stop-endless-loop-of-regional-violence-1116253156.html
"Israel isn’t relentlessly murderous and abusive because it’s run by Jews, it’s relentlessly murderous and abusive because that’s the only way to maintain an ethnostate that was abruptly dropped on top of an already existing civilization. This would be true if it’d been a Mormon state or a Romani state."
So true. And this is why supporting the Palestinians is not anti-Jewish, it's anti-genocide. The Israeli/Zionist Jews have (by and large, not universally) become poster children for the saying "Hurt people hurt people." This must stop.
But also need to understand the political impact pro-Israeli groups \like AiPAC which exist to lobby the Congress with financial
bribery , influence peddling and public propaganda to continue
supporting Israel with arms, missiles, detection systems; to continue the genocide
“Don’t ask if the world would be better without a Hamas, ask if the world would be better without the conditions which make a Hamas inevitable.” 👍🏻👍🏻
Catelin grows every day bigger into her role.
If anyone reads the British News...............here we go again.
The idea is to transport most illegal aliens from Britain to Rwanda.
How does that work out for the people of Rwanda?
"These things would happen regardless of what those respective ethnic and religious makeups happen to be."
Right, now watch Jew-haters flood the comments with their "expert" brain-farting insisting it's Jews and Judaism, and not Israel, that's at the core of the problem. Those are to be saluted with Heil Hitler!
"Pay less attention to people’s words about wanting “peace” and focus instead on what actions they are supporting to accomplish that end. This will show you the truth about what they really want."
That reminds me of how you should look closely at anyone who accuses another of antisemitism. What are they really saying? I made these notes today:
--
I'm sick of being told lies. Two facts.
1. Anyone who accuses another person of antisemitism is racist.
2. Any organisation adopting the IHRA definition of antisemitism is institutionally racist.
Firstly, Judaism is only one of the Semitic cultures. "Semitic" refers to Aramaic, Arabic, and Hebrew. Arabs, Ethiopians, and Arameans are also Semitic cultures yet are excluded from inclusion or protection under the term "antisemitism". It erases their voices and rights and only focusses on one culture, Judaism. The term antisemitism (as bandied around) is already fundamentally racist. It appropriates other cultures and silences vulnerable voices. It is primarily used to silence criticism of Israel's murderous actions: apartheid, genocide, illegal occupation, land theft. Israel was artificially created in 1948 (with full support from the English) amidst bloodshed and injustice against those whose land was stolen. Palestinians (as Arabs) are just as Semitic as Jews, yet those flinging racist accusations of antisemitism always exclude Palestinians (and every other Semitic culture) from their concern. Thus, to accuse someone of antisemitism is to reveal your inherent racism. Tories and Labour are both openly racist in the way they try to weaponise this controversial (and meaningless) term.
Secondly, if a definition needs "adopting" it is a warning sign that it is politically controversial. Heed that. We don't have to "adopt" a definition of racism, sexism or ageism because the meaning is unambiguous and clear. Racism is prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of skin colour or where someone was born. Sexism is prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of sex. Ageism is prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of age. We don't need to "adopt" anything.
Likewise the concept can be applied to belief systems. Anti-Christian (prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of someone being Christian), anti-Paganism (prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of someone being Pagan), anti-Judaism (prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of someone being Jewish). No definition needs adopting unless there is something suspicious going on. And you don't have to look far for what is being covered up. The controversial IHRA definition excludes the majority of Semitic cultures when it tries to define antisemitism. In this case it is an attempt to stifle criticism of Israel/Zionism by trying to falsely equate Israel with Judaism. Israel is not Judaism, as most Jews around the world will tell you - look up Jewish Voice for Peace to see how opposed many Jews are to Israel and its apartheid/genocide. The IHRA definition is a racist attempt to manipulate perceptions and politics and stifle criticism of Israel so that Palestinians can be erased from history, as is happening while I type this. It's why many claims of "the rise of antisemitism" are completely misleading, as legitimate criticism of the Israeli apartheid and genocide end up being falsely classed as antisemitic, when they are actually calls for justice and peace. The controversial IHRA definition of antisemitism means many peaceful Jews are classified as antisemitic, which shows how broken, corrupt and misleading this definition is.
I propose two things. One: any organisation that adopted the controversial IHRA definition of antisemitism should repeal it immediately, because to keep it is to promote racism, and only illustrates that the organisation supports genocide and apartheid. That includes DG Council. Two: any time you hear someone accuse another person of antisemitism, you should shout "Awa an boil yer heid, ya racist bam". Particularly if they are a politician. The concept of antisemitism is fundamentally racist. If you mean anti-Judaism, be specific and say that.
Dear Caitlin, Thank you! This is more than brilliant!
I am posting the link below - which I posted on your previous Newsletter - again, for those who understand and share the feelings of another.
https://twitter.com/BTnewsroom/status/1748123434683367780?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1748123434683367780|twgr^9a4936664407f0f49d6594f1dcdbc2aba780d927|twcon^s1_c10&ref_url=https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/US-Carries-Out-Major-Strikes-Against-Houthis-in-Yemen-20240123-0002.html
Actually, the rulers don't really want wars. They want submission from and enslavement of the rest of the world. Hence all those other means they keep exploring - AI, covid, social media zombification, digital tracking, divide and conquer along various fake notions, etc.
In that regard those who keep resisting via necessarily resorting to military means - Palestinians, other Middle Easterners, Russia - are really a big inconvenience and the nuisance for the elites. One can look at the fact armed resistance is still very much alive as the sign of the rulers' failing.