Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Revolution Continues's avatar

If you can't peacefully express your opinion with a protest sign, you're not living in a "democracy." If you live in a system that creates more and more junk at the expense of the world's health, you're not living in a "democracy." If you're preventing a peace deal from going through so your military industrial complex can make more money, you're not promoting "democracy." Wake the hell up, neolibs--you don't live in a democracy and you're not promoting it by condoning these fascistic actions.

Expand full comment
Doris Wrench Eisler's avatar

"Unprovoked invasion" can be assessed, and in this case easily proven not the case. So it is less deceitful, anomalous and obscurantist than, "provoked but unjustified." It is what less than knowledgeable people might say. But many knowledgeable and intelligent people have said the latter. Like, what the hell does it mean? To what extent should provocation be tolerated without counter-action? Yeah, strong reaction to having one NATO country in the vicinity but non adjacent, could be considered a tad touchy, but complete encirclement? A Nazified country next door when 28 million people in your country died fighting Nazism? The murder, after a coup deposing a pro-Russia president, of 14,000 ethnic Russians? Exactly when does criminal provocation become intolerable? Does the precise point involve a science? It seems to involve bias, certainly, and specifically a strong bias against Russia.

Expand full comment
35 more comments...

No posts