Listen to a reading of this article:
❖
Many leftists shy away from speaking out against western imperialism because they see international dynamics as too complex, when really it's the least complex part of the capitalist empire. The world's largest power structure murders human beings to exert control. See? Very simple.
If you understand that police brutality is a problem or that oligarchs are robbing the working class, then the idea that they're also holding together a globe-spanning empire using nonstop mass murder should be super easy. Only propaganda spins it as more complicated than that. Once you see how simple it is, how profoundly evil it is, and how all the other abuses of the empire depend on it, you understand that opposing the war machine of the US-centralized power alliance should be the very foremost priority of any leftist. It is the head of the beast.
❖
US interventionism is literally always disastrous and literally never accomplishes what its proponents claim it will, yet any time there's any strife anywhere in the world you get Americans saying "We've got to DO something!"
Why no. No you do not. Please, please please don't.
❖
The US government is waging wars around the world, circling the planet with military bases, ramping up nuclear standoffs and working to destroy any nation which disobeys it, so naturally the news media are urgently warning us about the horrible tyrannical government of Cuba.
❖
Yes the US has been deliberately strangling Cuba with the goal of fomenting unrest. Yes it has been attempting regime change ops in Cuba up to and including invasions and hundreds of assassination attempts. No you may not blame the US for unrest in Cuba, you goddamn tankie freak.
If you try to connect unrest in Cuba with the USA's extensive history of interventionism there, people yell at you for denying the Cuban people's "agency". Agency, agency, agency, agency. They'll factor in all sorts of agency except the Central Intelligence kind.
It's wild how the US has an intelligence agency whose actual job is causing instability and unrest in nations who disobey the its dictates, and it has a very extensive and well-documented history of doing so, but you get called a crazy idiot if you say "CIA" during periods of unrest and instability in those nations.
Only a deranged lunatic would suggest that the CIA might be doing the thing it literally always does.
❖
I'm teaching my kids about socialism by unilaterally imposing sanctions on their food and toys and then when they complain saying "See this proves socialism doesn't work."
❖
When US blockades on Cuba cause suffering, the suffering proves that socialism doesn't work. When US-backed blockades on Yemen cause suffering, it's an unfortunate and tragic accident of nature.
❖
Space colonization will never happen. It's a delusion promoted by billionaires who have a vested interest in marketing the idea that the ecologically unsustainable nature of status quo capitalism can be resolved by turning humanity into a spacefaring species. They are lying.
Capitalism has no answer for the destruction of our ecosystem. Money and profit motive have no wisdom for dealing with this predicament. That's why capitalism stans either pretend the destruction isn't happening or pretend the world is about to be saved by greedy tech oligarchs.
The most forceful defenders of Elon Musk are always also rabid capitalism proponents: they know that if billionaires can't save us from the consequences of ecocidal capitalism using technological innovations, then their entire worldview is invalid. But they can't, and it is.
Ecological collapse is coming up far faster than getting even a single living thing to Mars, but all the Mars people want to talk about is their dumb rockets. It's like the house is on fire but your toddler wants you to stop and play Thomas the Tank Engine with him.
I write words for a living yet I cannot find any which adequately express my rage at people who think it's fine that ecocidal capitalism is killing our home because Daddy Elon is going to fly us all to Mars.
"Hmm it seems we're turning earth into a barren desert. The only possible solution is for us all to fly up into space to live in a barren desert."
The solution to humanity's problems is not to attempt the impossible task of fleeing to space, it's to transcend our self-destructive patterning and move into a collaboration-based relationship with each other and with our ecosystem. Just like any individual who refuses to accept responsibility for their predicament, we're collectively flailing all over the place to place the solution anywhere but on us changing. We'll either become a conscious species or we'll die. There are no other options on the table.
❖
Anarchism sounds good in theory but in practice it just means regurgitating foreign policy talking points from the US State Department on the internet.
❖
Only those who have not metamorphosed personally rule out the possibility that humanity can metamorphose collectively.
____________________________
My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, following me on Facebook, Twitter, Soundcloud or YouTube, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Ko-fi, Patreon or Paypal. If you want to read more you can buy my books. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
Your comment on anarchism doesn’t make sense.
https://chomsky.info/1970____/
"...opposing the war machine of the US-centralized power alliance should be the very foremost priority of any leftist."
s/leftist/human being.
But this leaves us with a conundrum.
Caitlin rightfully identifies the Evil Empire, but that Evil cannot exist without Evil Human Beings being in charge. How should these Evil Human Beings be contained so that they don't harm the rest of us? Considering that they are suppose to be sociopaths and psychopaths, would't they have to be removed from society somehow and controlled.
Try making a (what seems to me to be a rational) point on some of the comments sections for various substack commentaries. The vitriol will rise and slurs of "tankie" or "commie" will quickly fill the pages. Another breathless epiphany on Operation Mockingbird will be embraced naming the culprits of the MSM who participate in the CIA propaganda. But should you point out something like the Evil Caitlin lists here, those same MSM outlets will be used as proof that the Evil either doesn't exist or is necessary to "protect Americans".
When Madeline Albright was asked if killing 500,000 Iraqi children was "worth it" and she replied "yes", isn't this a confession of her participation in Evil? Why isn't she in jail?
Seems to me that the majority of important leaders through out history have always been Sociopaths and Narcissists. That is certainly true of every President since George HW Bush. I can say this because I was watching them more closely than those prior to him.
Gun advocates keep reciting the right to self-defense. Is this an "inalienable right"? Then how should Human Beings protect themselves from Sociopaths? Is there an Organization to Rid the World of Sociopathic Leaders -- ORWSL? Which Sociopath would we choose to lead it?