Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark's avatar

Your comment on anarchism doesn’t make sense.

https://chomsky.info/1970____/

Expand full comment
JohnOnKaui's avatar

"...opposing the war machine of the US-centralized power alliance should be the very foremost priority of any leftist."

s/leftist/human being.

But this leaves us with a conundrum.

Caitlin rightfully identifies the Evil Empire, but that Evil cannot exist without Evil Human Beings being in charge. How should these Evil Human Beings be contained so that they don't harm the rest of us? Considering that they are suppose to be sociopaths and psychopaths, would't they have to be removed from society somehow and controlled.

Try making a (what seems to me to be a rational) point on some of the comments sections for various substack commentaries. The vitriol will rise and slurs of "tankie" or "commie" will quickly fill the pages. Another breathless epiphany on Operation Mockingbird will be embraced naming the culprits of the MSM who participate in the CIA propaganda. But should you point out something like the Evil Caitlin lists here, those same MSM outlets will be used as proof that the Evil either doesn't exist or is necessary to "protect Americans".

When Madeline Albright was asked if killing 500,000 Iraqi children was "worth it" and she replied "yes", isn't this a confession of her participation in Evil? Why isn't she in jail?

Seems to me that the majority of important leaders through out history have always been Sociopaths and Narcissists. That is certainly true of every President since George HW Bush. I can say this because I was watching them more closely than those prior to him.

Gun advocates keep reciting the right to self-defense. Is this an "inalienable right"? Then how should Human Beings protect themselves from Sociopaths? Is there an Organization to Rid the World of Sociopathic Leaders -- ORWSL? Which Sociopath would we choose to lead it?

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts