In a new interview with CBS Evening News, President Biden confirmed that his administration will not be lifting sanctions imposed upon Iran in order to bring Tehran to the negotiating table for the restoration of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal.
"Will the U.S. lift sanctions first in order to get Iran back to the negotiating table?” Biden was asked by CBS's Norah O'Donnell.
"No," the president replied.
"They have to stop enriching uranium first," asked O'Donnell.
Biden nodded in response.
There are a few things that are ridiculous about this, the first being that the JCPOA does not require that Iran "stop enriching uranium" at all. As explained by Al-Monitor's Arash Karami, the deal only calls for Iran to "keep its level of uranium enrichment at up to 3.67 %", a level it only began exceeding when the Trump administration backed out of the deal and imposed sanctions. The administration later clarified that Biden meant Iran would have to return to its JCPOA levels before negotiations could begin, but the fact that neither the United States president nor the high-profile reporter interviewing him appear to have been clear on this says a lot about the vapid nature of America's political/media class.
More importantly, this is confirmation from the horse's mouth that Biden is in effect continuing Trump's Iran policy. Trump began strangling Iran with crushing sanctions in an effort to force it to obey US dictates, and Biden is continuing that exact same strangulation while continuing to demand compliance with its dictates. The demands might be a little different, but the effect is identical since Tehran would never bow to either of them.
The Iranian government has repeatedly made it abundantly clear that it will not be rejoining the JCPOA until the United States comes back into compliance, since it was the US who first abandoned it. It claims, correctly, that it was in full compliance with the agreement when the Trump administration unilaterally backed out in May 2018. The argument that it is therefore Washington's responsibility to come back into compliance first is indisputable. Why would it re-enter a deal with a government that is clearly acting in bad faith and could just back out and impose civilian-killing sanctions on the nation again?
And that's just getting back to the negotiating table for re-entering the deal as it is written. Gareth Porter reported last month that the Biden administration may plan on using the sanctions regime it inherited from the previous presidency as a "Trump card" to try and coerce Tehran into agreeing to a modified version of the deal.
Neither of these things are going to happen. Iran will not modify the deal, and it will not come back into compliance before the government which first abandoned the deal comes back into compliance. And the Biden administration appears to be perfectly fine with this, reportedly toying with the idea of waiting all the way until after Iran's presidential elections in June to even begin approaching the deal.
The end result being that we still have a US presidency waging economic warfare upon Iran in exactly the same way it was before the 20th of January. Civilians are still having the life squeezed out of them by a far more powerful nation which does not view them as human beings, and it's only a matter of time before this administration or a subsequent one causes another flare up which pushes things to the brink of hot war like we saw a year ago.
Biden's Iran policy is in effect just a continuation of Trump's Iran policy that liberals can feel good about. It's Trump's Iran policy with gender pronouns in its bio.
Choosing to continue an immoral course of action is just as immoral as choosing to initiate an immoral course of action. If you're beating someone up and you leave when I get there, and then I choose to continue assaulting that person, I am just as culpable in that assault as you are. Presidents who choose to perpetuate one another's depraved policies are just as guilty of that depravity as their predecessors.
Starvation sanctions are the only type of warfare in which it is considered normal and acceptable to deliberately target a civilian population with deadly force. But it is not normal, and it is not acceptable. Biden and his team of ventriloquists fully own the effects of their warmongering. They don't get to just scribble "TRUMP'S FAULT" across them in crayon and act like they're innocent.
The mainstream media are fixated on the differences between the Biden administration and the Trump administration, just as they were fixated on the differences between the Trump administration and the Obama administration four years ago. If you can mentally mute that vapid soundtrack and look at the similarities between administrations instead, regardless of party affiliation and campaign platforms, you'll learn a lot more about what's really going on in the world.
_________________________
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon or Paypal. If you want to read more you can buy my new book Poems For Rebels (you can also download a PDF for five bucks) or my old book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
Haven't we seen this before with the last administration Biden was involved with? Obama continued and expanded Bush's policies and the liberals cheered what they used to be protesting against.
As a Navy veteran, I ask: ... Have you ever been on a large ship out at sea? You cannot stop the vessel on a dime, even if you reverse the propellers at full throttle. .. To avoid collisions, you better hope there is room to maneuver to the left or right while adjusting your speed. .. It can be very tricky, especially if unfriendly forces are taking shots at you. ....
... Since the boisterous blowhard days of Reagan and Thatcher, The U.S.S. United States has been hellbent on a "damn the torpedoes" neo-liberal course of insanity. .. One President, no matter who it is, cannot steer this ship into waters of sanity overnight. .. It will take a long time, with the right crew and a favorable political climate to right this incredible wrong. ...
... I have heard Joe Biden at town hall meetings in Wilmington speak of saner foreign policy ideals and objectives, but that is ancient history in the post-Watergate era of the mid-to-late 1970s, when all good Democrats were "feeling their oats" after Nixon left town --- and before Reagan turned the water BLACK.
>>> I know Joe has it in him to DO THE RIGHT THING deep down inside. .. We had some of the same Political Science Professors at the University of Delaware, so I know of what I speak. ... Whether or not he will act on those old impulses remains to be seen.