Tucker Carlson Is As Much A Propagandist As Anyone Else In MSM
Discover more from Caitlin’s Newsletter
Tucker Carlson Is As Much A Propagandist As Anyone Else In MSM
Listen to a reading of this article:
Fox News's fabulously popular right wing pundit Tucker Carlson has ratcheted up his show's anti-China propaganda yet again, introducing his interview with Brazil's rightist president Jair Bolsonaro with a psychotic rant against Beijing that, were it about Moscow, would have looked perfectly at home among even the most demented mainstream liberal punditry at the height of Russiagate hysteria around 2018.
Before attempting to help Bolsonaro reverse his abysmal polling against his left-wing opponent Lula da Silva in a presidential election this coming October, Carlson led with the completely unevidenced claim that "China has been busy with its own agenda—taking over the world."
All facts in evidence say that China is not working to "take over the world" (that's what the US is doing), but is rather working to give rise to a multipolar world order that's no longer dominated by a single unipolar hegemon. All the facts you ever see people citing to claim that China is attempting to supplant the US as unipolar hegemon are, when you drill down on them, in reality perfectly in alignment with Beijing's stated agenda of multipolarism. China taking up more space on the world stage only looks like an egregious assault when viewed through the prism of a worldview which believes this planet is the property of the United States government.
Carlson's claim that China has an agenda of "taking over the world" is also absurd on its face because it's nonsensical to claim that Beijing has been watching the US empire crush itself under its own weight, burning itself out in a few short decades with its frenzied attempts to rule the globe, and thinking "Hey that looks awesome, let's do that."
Carlson also made the even more ridiculous claim that "the Chinese have succeeded in re-colonizing the entire continent of Africa." Carlson does not bother explain how Africa was "re-colonized" in its entirety by China while the continent remains dominated militarily by United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) and economically by the World Bank, the IMF, and western plutocrats and corporations.
Clearly the Chinese government is not run by self-sacrificing martyrs who gain nothing from Chinese infrastructure projects in Africa, but it's absurd to put this on anywhere near the same level as the US dominating the continent with dozens of military bases and amassing proxy forces and the crushing neo-colonialism of the World Bank and IMF. Anyone who's done any intellectually honest research into Chinese infrastructure development in Africa knows that it is far more mutually beneficial and far more ethical than the western systems of oppression which have been exploiting that continent for centuries.
"So, why isn't the New York Times writing stories about any of this?" Carlson asks of the horrors in Africa he just invented in his head. "You know why – because the New York Times is on China's side."
Carlson is lying. This claim of his, that The New York Times is "on China's side," reveals so much about the fraudulent nature of Carlson's populism schtick. It takes nothing more than a quick search of the keyword "China" on NYT's website to show that the outlet has been frenetically churning out articles that can only be described as aggressively critical of China, like this one, this one, this one and this one, just to choose a few examples from the last few days.
Do you see how this works? Carlson portrays himself as an anti-establishment hero who's sharing knowledge with his viewers that they'll never hear from the elitists at The New York Times or those fat cats in Washington, then goes on to tell them things that are perfectly in alignment with the agendas of those establishment institutions. Do you see how this tricks viewers into believing they're getting the inside scoop on what the powerful are really up to behind closed doors, while actually manipulating them into alignment with the long-term goals of the powerful?
I have some overlap with Carlson's audience because I criticize some of the same things he does like the US proxy war in Ukraine, so some of my readers get confused and upset when I say he's just as much a propagandist as the empire spinmeisters on CNN and MSNBC. But if you actually look at what Carlson does from day to day you start to notice that he only criticizes some imperial actions which are opposed by right-wing populist strains in the US while continuously sheepdogging that audience into supporting establishment agendas like the cold war with China, legitimizing two-party electoral politics, and keeping everyone fixated on vapid culture war bullshit.
There is no more important goal for the oligarchic empire than securing US hegemony by halting the rise of China, and there is no figure more effective in manufacturing consent for that goal than Tucker Carlson. He gains credibility by appearing to fight the power, then uses that stolen credibility to help manufacture consent for the most high-priority agendas of the powerful.
And that's just the sort of behavior you'd expect from someone whose life has been full of highly shady overlap with the Central Intelligence Agency and who has actually admitted to having applied to join the CIA.
Carlson introduced Bolsonaro as a leader who opposes "allowing Brazil to become a colony of China," implanting the idea that this is a real thing in his gullible audience's mind. China is taking over the world, and the powerful political and media elites want it to take over the world, so the best way to fight those elites is to support the fight against China. Never mind the fact that the fucking Pentagon says openly that China is America's number one enemy, and that the entire political/media class is firmly in alignment with the agenda to stop it.
The propaganda campaign against China has been quietly heating up on the back burner while everyone focuses on Russia and Ukraine. Every so often I mention China on social media and the responses I get from those who listen to Tucker Carlson and his fellow "right populist" pundits are just appalling in their stupidity and their white hot emotionality.
I am really not looking forward to when the imperial crosshairs move to Beijing, partly for the self-evident reason that this will be extremely dangerous and economically disastrous, but also because getting swarmed by all these brainwashed dupes in my replies is going to be excruciating. They've already been made crazy, and they're going to be driven a whole lot crazier as this propaganda campaign gains more and more momentum.
If you've fallen for this ruse, it's not too late to step back and realize that you haven't been receiving brave anti-establishment commentary from the single most prominent pundit in the Murdoch press. Anyone who tells you that the correct response to your instinct that things are messed up is to vote for one of America's two mainstream parties, consume mainstream media, and hate your government's enemies is very clearly working to deceive you.
___________________
My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, following me on Facebook, Twitter, Soundcloud or YouTube, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Ko-fi, Patreon or Paypal. If you want to read more you can buy my books. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. All works co-authored with my American husband Tim Foley.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
Tucker Carlson Is As Much A Propagandist As Anyone Else In MSM
I'm going to admit it: I'm one of those who can see all the BS marketing propaganda about Russia & Ukraine - yet I remain deeply sceptical about China.
As an Australian, it is easy for me to understand that Russia is in no way a threat to us, and should not be considered an enemy. (Besides having looked at some of the historical background of the Ukraine invasion, Russia's position re NATO, the Ukraine attacks on the Donbas, and so on.)
It is also easy to see that Australia has been manipulated by the US, from "All the way with LBJ" for the war in Vietnam, to the sacking of the Whitlam (Labor) government in 1975, and most recently (FFS) with our newly minted PM Albanese attending the NATO summit in Madrid last week.
I'm willing to keep a more open mind about China, especially around the potential for propaganda (which operates in both directions, of course). But my direct experience here is that China has been taking over more and more of this country, and I don't like it. I don't like that the whole area in which I live (in south suburban Brisbane) has become a second Chinatown, with Chinese shops starting to dominate the local shopping centres. Not in an interesting way, either.
I don't like that a Chinese company has a 99 year lease on the Port of Darwin - and that similar Chinese companies now have controlling interests in our energy companies (& other infrastructure), agricultural production, and mining.
I lived and worked in Japan for 3 years, a few decades back, and I've travelled a lot in SE Asia. But I don't want my own country to be turned into a Chinese colony. I don't like the Chinese social credit system, and I don't want it here.
I'm willing to be open to the possibility that most of the protests in Hong Kong were caused by CIA agents, and similarly that most of the "human rights abuses" that we hear about, are simply anti-China propaganda.
However, I also don't want to blindly accept the other position, that China is acting from pure benevolence.
China is a huge country, with a huge need for natural resources, including food, water, and minerals. It makes sense for us to accept China as a valuable trading partner - but not to allow them to exploit us.
I think we should be looking after our own interests as a country, not just following the US in its military exploits, or allowing China to rape us.
Anyhow, I shall continue to try to keep a balanced view, so thank you Caitlin, for presenting this perspective.
Thank you for revealing this. I've had the sense that Tucker is a double propaganda agent--mixing lies in with truth so you swallow the whole. And on Africa, don't forget the 14 countries forced to use the African franc. Currency colonization is why Quaddafi got a French bullet to the brain for intending to create the Pan-African dinar backed by Libyan gold.