The US Empire's Ultimate Target Is Not Russia But China
Listen to a reading of this article:
❖
The Pentagon has produced its latest National Defense Strategy (NDS), a report made every four years to provide the public and the government with a broad overview of the US war machine's planning, posturing, developments and areas of focus.
You might assume with all the aggressive brinkmanship between Moscow and the US power alliance this year that Russia would feature as Enemy Number One in the 2022 NDS, but you would be assuming incorrectly. The US "Defense" Department reserves that slot for the same nation that's occupied it for many years now: China.
Antiwar's Dave DeCamp writes the following:
The full NDS is still classified, but the Pentagon released a fact sheet on the document that says it “will act urgently to sustain and strengthen deterrence, with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as our most consequential strategic competitor and the pacing challenge for the Department.”
The fact sheet outlines four priorities for the Pentagon:
Defending the homeland, paced to the growing multi-domain threat posed by the PRC
Deterring strategic attacks against the United States, Allies, and partners
Deterring aggression, while being prepared to prevail in conflict when necessary, prioritizing the PRC challenge in the Indo-Pacific, then the Russia challenge in Europe
Building a resilient Joint Force and defense ecosystem
"The Pentagon says that while China is the focus, Russia poses 'acute threats' because of its invasion of Ukraine," DeCamp writes, showing the empire's view of Moscow as a second-tier enemy.
Ahead of a meeting with China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has made some comments which clearly illustrate the US-centralized empire's actual problem with Moscow.
"We, together with you, and with our sympathisers will move towards a multipolar, just, democratic world order," Lavrov said to the Chinese government on Wednesday.
And that right there ladies and gentlemen is the real reason we've been hearing so much hysterical shrieking about Russia these last five or six years. It's never been about Russian hackers. Nor about a Kremlin pee pee tape. Nor about Trump Tower. Nor about GRU bounties in Afghanistan. Nor about Manafort, Flynn, Bannon, Papadopoulos or any other Russiagate Surname of the Week. It's not even actually about Ukraine. Those have all been narrative-shaping constructs manipulated by the US intelligence cartel to manufacture support for a final showdown against Russia and China to prevent the emergence of a multipolar world.
The US government has had a policy in place since the fall of the Soviet Union to prevent the rise of any powers which could challenge its imperial agendas for the world. During the (first) Cold War the strategy promoted by empire managers like Henry Kissinger was to court China out of necessity to pull it away from the USSR, which was when we saw business ties between China and the US lead to immense profits for certain individuals in both nations and the influx of wealth which now has China on track to surpass the US as an economic superpower.
Once the USSR ended, so too did the need to remain on friendly terms with China, and subsequent decades saw a sharp pivot into a much more adversarial relationship with Beijing.
In what history may one day view as the US empire's greatest strategic blunder, empire managers forecasted the acquisition of post-soviet Russia as an imperial lackey state which could be weaponized against the new Enemy Number One in China. Instead, the exact opposite happened.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the Bloomberg New Economy Forum last year that she'd "heard for years that Russia would become more willing to move toward the west, more willing to engage in a positive way with Europe, the UK, the US, because of problems on its border, because of the rise of China." But that's not what occurred.
"We haven't seen that," Clinton said. "Instead what we've seen is a concerted effort by Putin maybe to hug China more."
The empire's expectation that Moscow would come grovelling to the imperial throne on its own meant that no real effort was expended trying to establish goodwill and win over its friendship. NATO just kept on expanding and the empire got increasingly aggressive and belligerent in its games of global conquest. This error has led to the strategist's ultimate nightmare of having to fight for global domination against two separate powers at once. Because empire architects incorrectly predicted that Moscow would end up fearing Beijing more than it fears Washington, the tandem between China's economic power and Russia's military power that experts have been pointing to for years has only gotten more and more intimate.
And now here we are with Russian and Chinese officials openly discussing their plans to create a multipolar world while Chinese pundits crack jokes about the US empire's transparent ploys to turn Beijing against Moscow over the Ukraine invasion:
On the empire's grand chessboard, Russia is the queen piece, but China is the king. Just as with chess it helps to take out your opponent's strongest piece to more easily pursue checkmate, the US empire would be well advised to try and topple China's nuclear superpower friend and, as Consortium News editor-in-chief Joe Lauria recently put it, "ultimately restore a Yeltsin-like puppet to Moscow."
Basically all we're looking at in the major international news stories of our time is the rise of a multipolar world crashing headlong into an empire which has espoused the belief that unipolar domination must be retained at all cost, even if it means flirting with the possibility of a very fast and radioactive third world war.
This is the Hail Mary pass of the US hegemon. Its last-ditch effort to secure control before forever losing any chance at it. Many anti-imperialist pundits I read regularly seem quite confident that this effort will fail, while I personally think those forecasts may be a bit premature. The way the chess pieces are moving it definitely does look like there's a plan in place, and I don't think they'd be orchestrating that plan if they didn't believe it had a chance to succeed.
One thing that does seem clear is that the only way the empire has any chance of stopping the rise of China is by maneuvers that will be both highly disruptive and existentially dangerous for the entire world. If you think things are crazy now, just you wait until the imperial crosshairs move to Beijing.
________________________
My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, following me on Facebook, Twitter, Soundcloud or YouTube, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Ko-fi, Patreon or Paypal. If you want to read more you can buy my books. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
The problem is both are targets, but targets of different groupings in the neo-con and neo-liberal branches of the elites.
One grouping, the Victoria Nuland/Antony Blinken neo-cons are eurocentric with family history hatred of things Russia and work for resource (oil, minerals, foodstuffs) groupings of American Oligarchy, the old money. They want to split up Russia and "stans, stripping them of resources ala South America.
The other branch, William Burns, et al neo-libs, work for the new money, the fashion goods, high tech industry, Silicon Valley, Pharma, etc, who want China (and India) kept down as a source of cheap labor, and to eliminate intellectual competition from their sectors.
The dithering back and forth between a pivot to Asia (re-enslave China): or deconstructing Russia isn't anything new, it was already a serious issue under Obama, a man of no principals and no convictions. That plus it burned him that Putin was smarter.
Because for 20 plus years when it was needed the USA has lacked a president with the intellect, convictions, and holding power to stay any single course, the constant jostling between the neo-cons and neo-liberals over doing their masters bidding has thrown the ships tiller back and forth. It's just luck and timing that Russia came out first on the beating stick.
From Caitlin.....
And now here we are with Russian and Chinese officials openly discussing their plans to create a multipolar world while Chinese pundits crack jokes about the US empire's transparent ploys to turn Beijing against Moscow over the Ukraine invasion:
"Can you help me fight your friend so that I can concentrate on fighting you later?
A short memory is an infectious American disease. No one remembers Korea, the Chinese involvement, when even at that very early stage of its development into a major power after being used and abused by all and sundry during WWII, it was still able to supply all that was required to fight the USA, still stuck (by choice ) with 30,000 troops) on the the border, between North and South Korea, also known as the Military Demarcation Line.
And that was a very long time ago. The feeble Joe Biden hadn't even reached puberty at that time so probably missed seeing the ability of country like China change its allegiances, if and when required. Look at it now. If he and his war stooges think there is one chance in a million of convincing China to ever see the imperialist USA as a better associate / partner / friend than Russia, it is time for him to discard his role as front man for BlackRock, Vanguard and Big Pharma and join a Washington church group whose sole motivation is the 'second coming', because that will be the only thing which will save him from an ignominious end.
Of course, he would need to check with Israel to see if the 'second coming' is OK with them first.