Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vin LoPresti's avatar

"Vulgar" seemed to always be a favorite adjective of the British nobility. It was vulgar to associate with the working classes or even with the bourgeoisie, unless they were your barristers or physicians. Cockney accents were assuredly vulgar as were tweed workmen's caps, folks with darker skins, and other images offensive to that upper crust, which ultimately had those "standards" reflected in the economic elites of other western societies, including the US. But the blatant vulgarity of colonialism, of the theft of resources and impoverishment of indigenous peoples never seemed to enter their vocabulary of vulgarity. To continue, in this century, to sustain any level of adulation of this group of manufactured gods seems extremely vulgar to me, in the sense that pursuing delusions of noblesse oblige in the face of all evidence to the contrary represents the ultimate vulgarity of serfdom.

Expand full comment
Starry Gordon's avatar

I don't really understand the Anglophone fascination with the British royal family. Certainly the British state has acted about as badly as the others, but after George III went irretrievably bonkers, it doesn't seem to me that they had much influence on Great Britain or the world. It is true a lot of them were Nazi sympathizers, but so were a lot of people back in the day, which later was carefully covered up. The actual rulers of Britain sidelined them. Subsequently they became the staples of the American supermarket press along with other vacuous celebrities and rich people, largely harmless prolefeed. Let them go.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts