162 Comments
User's avatar
Feral Finster's avatar

Straight troof, although I might have wished Americans communicate with Russians or Iranians.

Any people anywhere that might disperse their Marvel Comics view of the world.

Expand full comment
teddyG's avatar

China is fine but, yeah, Russia or the Persians are right up there near the top.

Expand full comment
Feral Finster's avatar

The point is to disperse one's "Team America" worldview.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 20
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Yoni Reinón's avatar

apparently your father fought for nothing

Expand full comment
🇬🇹 Kate Pablo (she/her)♡🇵🇸's avatar

What's that? I don't understand the language of a yapper.

Expand full comment
The Revolution Continues's avatar

"It is nonsensical to think of either of them as a lesser evil."

It's time to stop this nonsensical, dualistic thinking style in the West. The opposite of "evil Biden" isn't "good Trump" or vice versa. It's "both men are evil capitalist puppets of the billionaires." If you keep that in mind, you'll be able to see through the propaganda and glimpse their true owner-operators at work.

So glad to see so many Americans chatting online with Chinese folks on Red Note. The world becomes a more peaceful and happy place the better we get to know each other.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

>>"The world becomes a more peaceful and happy place the better we get to know each other."

🎯💯❤️

Expand full comment
CrumpledForeskin's avatar

People are so indoctrinated, it’s impossible to talk any sense into them. It’s a class war and we should stay together and take back what is deservedly ours!

Expand full comment
Darkstar's avatar

The truth is, the offerings of the Democrats

( Kamala & Tim ) was so bad,that Trump actually seemed less dangerous.

Expand full comment
Marquis's avatar

It is like the Democrats just winged it without even trying. Harris had no meaningful stance or issues or policy in my opinion.

Expand full comment
The Revolution Continues's avatar

Harris' policy stance was "Joy" if you recall. How the heck can anyone with a conscience feel "joy" when their government is arming/funding a genocide of innocents? She really must have wanted to lose.

Expand full comment
Klonda56's avatar

Or is a psychopath.

Expand full comment
Darkstar's avatar

I believe they intentionally lost the election.

Vance wearing dresses is bad enough.

But Walz, with his idea of tampons in boys bathrooms was past anything close to sanity.

Joy,nah.

Laughing gas was more like it.

Expand full comment
Daniel Taylor's avatar

Uh, no. That was Republican propaganda bullshit.

It's actually perfectly normal to put tampons in every bathroom in a school. Most schools in the US do it. Why? Because GIRLS HAVE SPORTS TEAMS. When you've got two entire girls teams changing you flipping well want to give the visiting team a different bathroom to change in. That means giving them the boys room.

(Also, it's way more expensive at a procurement level to start micro-managing your bathrooms instead of just putting standard fittings in all of them.)

This was, as usual, the Murdoch propaganda machine taking something perfectly normal that everyone does, lying about it to make it sound weird, then lying again to say it's a Democratic thing.

Expand full comment
Darkstar's avatar

She didn't, Marquis. I've been doubting that the Democrats wanted to win for a long time now.

So, we have election rigging in reverse?

Expand full comment
River's avatar

Yeah, so I think this is part of the machine. That when its time to throw it over to the other party to balance public sentiment, the reciprocating party will often (not always) work to throw the election.

Expand full comment
Mikhael's avatar

I think there's some truth in that.

Expand full comment
Jorge, PhD's avatar

I don't think anything has exasperated me as much as how weak of a leader Biden was his entire life. Always half measures, always waiting till the time had passed to make a decision. His entire administration was indecisiveness and "looking into it". You won't be missed

Expand full comment
Ron Stockton's avatar

I don’t think Biden was weak. He strongly supported a war with Russia and he brought on the Ukraine mess. He strongly supported Zionism and American and Jewish exceptionalism and he let the Zionists know very early that he supported a genocide. I think he did exactly what he and the establishment behind him intended to do.

Expand full comment
Barbara Berberi's avatar

You beat me to this response!

Expand full comment
gypsy33's avatar

Hi Ron

I don’t believe it was all ByeDone making the decisions; it was his proxy president, Bloody Butcher Bastard Blinken.

Expand full comment
Michael  Lynch's avatar

Biden was a "bio-rubber stamp", along the same lines as those thousands of "bio-robots" who fought the disaster at Chernobyl by removing debris from the roofs around Unit 4. Biden was a textbook example of a feckless figurehead, managed and manipulated to do the bidding of the Great and Powerful Wizard behind the velvet curtain. I believe that we can safely say that Biden was the antithesis of JFK, and we all know what happened to JFK. It is never safe to go against the wishes of the Great and Wonderful Oz!

Expand full comment
@smokygirl2006's avatar

Amen!!

Expand full comment
Mikhael's avatar

Exactly.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Biden was always pure evil (going back to the 80s), but few people (including myself) were aware of just how much. His presidency showed us just how much (Ukraine and Gaza).

Expand full comment
includeMeOut's avatar

As long time senator from Delaware he was essentially a tool of finance capital, the “Senator from MasterCard and Visa”. He skimmed lots of cash throughout the years for himself and his depraved family.

Expand full comment
Contrarian 33's avatar

Every bit of that, Jorge, is accurate. He was however, a perfect example of what America has become. He was the perfect example....dementia on two shaky legs.

America is the same.

I have a feeling in my bones that someone, somewhere will see what Biden was, and has always been and show him and the world that his extremes....zionism, genocide mass murder, starvation, rape, children's deaths, etc., can only be tolerated for a period before some form of penalty must be paid.

In the olden days it would have been well over by now, so if I was Biden, enjoying the Pope's blessing through regular Mass in his Roman Catholic environment in Delaware every week, I would keep a very low profile. After all, I believe it is written in the New King James Version of the Bible, stating clearly from Romans 12:19, “Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to wrath; for it is written, ‘Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,’ says the Lord.”

Let us leave it up to the Lord then, but the sooner the better.

Failing that result, the list of volunteers would be endless.

(Please keep my reference to the Bible secret. My mention of the Bible could end my lifelong membership of the Rationalist Party because of this hypocrisy, Rationalism being defined as a mental attitude that accepts the supremacy of REASON.)

Expand full comment
Ned B.'s avatar

Vengeance is mine, sayeth the horde.

Expand full comment
Mikhael's avatar

As usual, perfect response, Ned B.!

Expand full comment
Peter Sawchuk's avatar

I have also heard it said that God helps those who help themselves.

Expand full comment
TS's avatar
Jan 20Edited

I don't think he was weak. He was a fully functioning committed sell-out to corporations, including the military-industrial corps, and (obviously) to the zionist cause, to which he strongly delivered whatever they wanted year in and year out to this last day. He wasn't "weak" for us, he was paid to do other things than serve us.

Expand full comment
Klonda56's avatar

He wasn’t a leader. An 80 year old figurehead.

Expand full comment
gypsy33's avatar

Hi Klonda

I’m not convinced he’s actually alive; he’s propped up with cement in his shoes with a demented ventriloquist making him speak.

“Weekend at ByeDone’s”.

Expand full comment
Spunty's avatar

9/11 and October 7. Both false flag ops.

Expand full comment
CrumpledForeskin's avatar

You can bet anytime something of that magnitude happens, it’s a false flag. Especially in this day and age, with the level of surveillance that is happening.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Nope - neither was a false flag. (Jan 6 was also NOT a false flag).

Expand full comment
Spunty's avatar

Your rationale?

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Requires a longer conversation. Involves probability, statistics, randomness (i.e. coincidences), baises and fallacies in thinking (false dichotomy, availability heuristic, apophenia, confirmation bias, anecdotal evidence, many others).

Many people that believe in "conspiracy theories" and conspiratorial thinking also exhibit signs of Apophenia (Apophenia is common in conspiracy theories, where coincidences may be woven together into an apparent plot), false flag events, etc.

Note: This does NOT mean that there are no false flags or no conspiracy theories. It simply means that the evidence required to prove the hypotheses has not been met (conclusively or rigirously or through evidence-based experimentation and analysis).

Expand full comment
Guest's avatar

You haven’t done jackshit in regards to evaluating the evidence about either event. You just spout off your pat admonition about “conspiratorial thinking” in your trademark know-it-all fashion with your trademark condescending “note” (replete with capitalized NOT).

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Not sure what your problem is dude. I DON'T need to convince YOU of ANYTHING. You are free to believe WHATEVER you want.

Expand full comment
gypsy33's avatar

Oh Chang. You know I luv ya, but how much evidence is it going to take to convince you that Amerikkka and its little Buddy are the rulers of false flag incidents?

Gulf of Tonkin “ incident”, anyone?

And surely, Chang, you must know that Lee Harvey Oswald didn’t kill JFK.

Oops, forgot those “WMDs” in Iraq…

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Gypsy, it's not only the quantity of evidence. What's more important is the QUALITY of evidence and the METHOD OF ANALYSIS of the evidence.

Even IF the US has committed false flags before (AND IT HAS), it doesn't mean EVERY low-probability event is a false flag. An event has to meet the EVIDENTIARY BURDEN to be proven as a false flag event (which none of these events have met).

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" - Carl Sagan

(https://effectiviology.com/sagan-standard-extraordinary-claims-require-extraordinary-evidence/)

>>"And surely, Chang, you must know that Lee Harvey Oswald didn’t kill JFK."

There is MORE REAL evidence that Oswald DID kill JFK than alternate hypotheses. (Yes, I know that 90% of the US population thinks otherwise).

Here are some resources (though I doubt you'll check them out):

(1) "Thinking Critically About the Kennedy Assassination: Debunking the Myths and Conspiracy Theories" by Michel Jacques Gagné (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/61668209-thinking-critically-about-the-kennedy-assassination)

(2) "The Kennedy Assassinations: JFK and Bobby Kennedy - Debunking The Conspiracy Theories" by Mel Ayton (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/61434059-the-kennedy-assassinations)

(3) How to Think About Conspiracy Theories, JFK Assassination (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLueJPOpdkU)

Expand full comment
Mikhael's avatar

Have a little more imagination, Chang.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

THAT is the problem - TOO MUCH imagination and not enough logic/critical thinking.

Expand full comment
Indu Abeysekara's avatar

Caitlin's line : "It's not that Trump is good, It's that Biden was just that bad", shows the paucity of language if nothing else. It is well to remember that all American Presidents were/are war criminals. And it comes from the impeccable research of a public intellectual and a linguist.

We have plenty of terrible times ahead of us to test how less of an evil Trump is going to be. He already has told Netanyahu that "... you do whatever you are supposed to do...".

The gathering of U.S. presidents at President Carter's funeral was referred to as “The World’s Most Exclusive Club.” As something I read the other day noted, "What other club of so few has caused so much suffering to so many?"

Expand full comment
The Revolution Continues's avatar

Very true. When I saw that photo of all the presidents sitting together at Carter's funeral, all I could think was, "Where's a 2,000 pound bomb to drop on top of all those war criminals at once when you need one?"

Expand full comment
JennyStokes's avatar

It was in my mind too.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

👏👍 Well said TRC!

Expand full comment
Selina Sweet's avatar

Hatred is false power; understanding is real power.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

How about this then -> I like having BOTH real power (understanding) AND false power (hatred of evil people).

Expand full comment
Selina Sweet's avatar

yes. The ego loves “hatred” for its seeming empowerment it delivers.

Expand full comment
The Revolution Continues's avatar

I don't like to "hate" people, either, but when you see so much evil sitting together in one place like all those former presidents at Carter's funeral, you realize that you must take action to stop that evil from continuing on in order to save future generations. It truly is "love" to take out evil. To paraphrase Chris Hedges: "I fight fascists not because I think I can win. I fight fascists because they are fascists."

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

👏👏

Expand full comment
TS's avatar

James Garfield was not a war criminal. He would have been one of the good ones, if he hadn't been murdered.

Expand full comment
🇬🇹 Kate Pablo (she/her)♡🇵🇸's avatar

Have always known this. The democratic and republican parties do not deserve anything. They should become remnants of the history books, sad reminders of a savage time when the so-called enlightened West existed.

Expand full comment
CrumpledForeskin's avatar

The guillotine for every single one that voted to arm Israel!

Expand full comment
gypsy33's avatar

Hi CF

I’d be happy to perform the honors 😁

Expand full comment
Richard Parker's avatar

If Israel signed a ceasefire agreement, why did it then ramp up hostilities and deaths???? A few more days of destruction.

The true intentions of Israel remain unchanged, kill and destroy Palestinians and their home.

This is all just a farce. A political stunt by Trump. Once he has got that card, "I stopped the killing", Israel will be given more weapons and the go ahead to continue based on Hamas is still active.

Only this time the Israeli murderers will be told to tone down the celebratory videos.

Expand full comment
CrumpledForeskin's avatar

This is obviously what’s happening. People are jumping the gun. I wish it was over, but it’s not.

Expand full comment
Vin LoPresti's avatar

The corruption in the system is deeply ingrained and provokes a wild entropy that takes enormous energy to overcome. It's an intractable beast, Voting is like bouncing a dart off its thick hide. Taming it is a hopeless endeavor.

Expand full comment
TS's avatar

Ah, the "subtle abuses" of the Obama regime, like when they utterly destroyed Libya, the country with the highest per capita income in Africa. President Gaddafi was making the desert bloom. NATO not only bombed the aquifers, they bombed the factories that made the pipes to lay the aquifers. Thank you, Hilary Clinton, who convinced President Obama to publicly murder President Gaddafi, (drag him from his car, beat, sodomize, and murder) and destroy his country, a dysfunctional hell-hole ever since. Her "We came, we saw, he died" quip was monstrous.

Expand full comment
Robert Billyard's avatar

Both parties have lost the ability to deliver candidates worthy of the office. Trump faces daunting challenges, many of which he is not even aware . He does not have the rationality or knowledge base to be effective. He is running on ego, bombast and narcissism. It is going to be interesting to see how long he lasts, given his age and everything else.

Expand full comment
TS's avatar

Agreed. Once an organization becomes corrupt (as when the Republican Party and then the Democratic Party sold out to the corporations) they cannot let anyone into their group who is smarter, or less corrupt than they are. Thus, every political generation (two years in this country) becomes more stupid and more corrupt, until we are left with the pair of clown car shows we see today.

Expand full comment
gypsy33's avatar

Hi TS

Have you ever seen an interview with Col. Douglas MacGregor?

Why in the name of all that’s good and decent isn’t HE POTUS?

Expand full comment
TS's avatar

If he is good and decent he cannot become POTUS, until we find a way of by-passing the Democratic and Republican machinery. Neither the Dems nor the Reps will set a person in power over them who is smarter and less corrupt than any of them.

Expand full comment
charles leone's avatar

The $37 Trillion question for the new administration is: Will it bury the Neo-con/Neo-lib hatchet and engage with China and the BRICs nations to promote F.D.R.s Good Neighbor policy throughout the Global South?

Humanity is hopeful for the end of Imperial/Colonial oppression.

Expand full comment
Spunty's avatar

The $37 trillion answer is, No.

Expand full comment
Patrick Powers's avatar

Imperial/Colonial oppression is the unifying principle of the US government. The whole thing revolves around this. It has the big advantage of keeping the people in fear and deprivation, thus sapping strength from the rebellious have-nots, then absorbed by the security state.

Expand full comment
CrumpledForeskin's avatar

That’s a fat NO!!

Expand full comment
Robert H Stiver's avatar

Great post, Caitlin. Indeed, the Biden-Harris Duo of Dunces was indescribably bad. My prediction: the Colonial Zionist monster will take this interlude (42 days, is it?) to really, really stick it to the West Bankers: it's its continual M/O: don't miss any opportunity to exploit an opportunity. Viva Palestine!

Expand full comment
Rod Dawson's avatar

It was the window dressing. The air drops and the wash-away-able pier, the pretence that Biden cared while also donating billions in weapons designed to kill as indiscriminately as possible. As if leaving the overt Zionist Blinken in charge had not already signalled his brutal intention, as if his every action did not make it clear that obliteration was fine by him. 'I am a Zionist!' Biden said for the cameras, then let the televised slaughter prove it. How utterly vile and unspeakably revolting. How he must have chortled as he imagined viewers thinking 'He's sent aid! Maybe he's a good guy after all'. Too little, of course. Just enough to look good on tv. And, of course, Israel soon made it clear they were against anything at all that might keep Palestinians alive. Starvation, disease, cold, tainted water, makeshift tents, no power - if Israel wanted it, Genocide Joe and the US Veto made sure they got it. What scammer. What a cynical manipulator. What contempt for decent people. What a nasty, nasty man.

Expand full comment
Rodolfo Marusi Guareschi's avatar

Confucius, Sun Tzu and Mao Tse Tung were born from the Chinese people. They (the Chinese) know how to fight, they are motivated to fight and they have a holistic vision of the future. They will no longer be put to sleep by opium, they believe in things that are feasible, they have the largest population on the planet and they do in a month what we do not do in less than a year. They trust in the effects of the progressive level of development of the productive forces and they know who is best to ally themselves with. They have, in my humble opinion, only one limit: they still believe in the function of the state. But, that is because, in China, the state is not the means of the richest.

Expand full comment
David Avenell's avatar

You could also have mentioned that the Chinese Govt has just about the highest level of trust and respect of their people, than almost any other govt. in the world.

Certainly way higher than Amerika, Australia or the UK.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

>>"You could also have mentioned that the Chinese Govt has just about the highest level of trust and respect of their people, than almost any other govt. in the world."

David Avenell, you are SO MISTAKEN. Have you lived in China and/or actually talked to/with people in China in an environment that is NOT monitored (i.e. surveillance)?

There is an INCREDIBLE amount of fear, corruption, etc. in China. Just as MANY are fooled by US propaganda, similarly please don't be fooled by Chinese propaganda. (This has NOTHING to do with what the West says about China - I'm talking here about REAL experiences and REAL conversations)

Expand full comment
gypsy33's avatar

Chang, let me tell you a story about my neighbors.

He was a GM engineer who was sent to work in China for a number of years. She taught English there. When they returned to Amerikkka they missed China so much that he begged to be sent back, which they were for several more years.

They’re back home now, but often return to visit the country they love for weeks at a time.

Additionally my near genius-level grandson is teaching himself Mandarin. I strongly encourage this; since he plans to go into engineering, I told him he may wish to live in China someday.

Expand full comment
martin's avatar

there's academic research on this.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Yes, there’s academic research on everything (including Covid cures and paranormal activity). It doesn’t mean jack shit.

Academic research is NOT proof (one way or the other) of the validity of any opinion or point of view.

Expand full comment
martin's avatar

nevertheless, imo it should be considered along the anecdotal evidence you seem to refer to.

Expand full comment
Chang Chokaski's avatar

Seriously? You're doubling down on a fallacious argument? Including strawmanning?

Did I mention not to consider academic research? (here's your strawman argument insinuating that I am not considering such information - though I have NEVER alluded to such a thing).

Also, WHAT academic research? And by whom? Academic research by people biased AGAINST China? Or academic research by people biased IN FAVOR OF China? Do you think ALL academic research is objective and unbiased?

Your argument is invalid (in this context).

Expand full comment
Marquis's avatar

We have had Trump before and how you had wrote that the empire managers didn't like his outward style. Compared to the well spoken Obama for example who was no less evil.The smooth talking Clinton...Or George W. The guy who was the butt of many jokes. The fact that the Democrats had the sitting president sit out the election was a sign they truly failed or succeeded spectacularly...It doesn't matter who we vote for, who we vote for is the choice of the empire. They choose those that serve their interests. Trump will be horrible, but more experienced, he will be more subtle...he will eventually be seen as the new George W. Democrats spun the same song with him as they did Trump...Harris didn't win the popular vote like Hillary, they lost seats in both houses, not that it matters, just saying their message lost its effect, that Trump was a super dictator. Maybe I am wrong, Trump could be the new Reagan...Again, same empire mission, new veneer.

Expand full comment