Caitlin’s Newsletter

Share this post

Every US Enemy Is Hitler: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

www.caitlinjohnst.one

Discover more from Caitlin’s Newsletter

Articles, poems, stories and thoughts by Caitlin Johnstone and Tim Foley. Everything published here will always remain free to read.
Over 35,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Every US Enemy Is Hitler: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

Caitlin Johnstone
Mar 1, 2022
69
Share this post

Every US Enemy Is Hitler: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

www.caitlinjohnst.one
73
Share
File:Vladimir Putin (2022-02-24).jpg

Listen to a reading of this article:

❖

It's just incredible how even after all this time, after all those wars, after all those lies, it's not even occurring to most mainstream westerners to investigate whether the US could possibly have had anything to do with starting the war in Ukraine.

There's one asshole in the room who always starts shit. Any time any shit has started he's always been involved. And hardly anyone's even looking at him thinking, "I wonder if that shit-starting guy has anything to do with this?"

❖

I am convinced that mainstream culture's fascination with World War II has made us all dumber. Everyone just lives in this dopey children's cartoon now where every US enemy is Hitler and they're the brave hero who is fighting Hitler.

❖

Ukraine has no chance of winning this war alone, no matter how many weapons are sent to it. All weapons can do is make the war more costly for Russia, which it's in the US empire's interests to do. Stop pretending your calls for more weapons are anything more noble than that.

You're not trying to save lives; only the negotiation of a ceasefire can do that. All you're doing with your calls to arm Ukraine is helping the most powerful empire that has ever existed make this war more expensive for Moscow and hurt Putin's popularity at home and abroad.

This was the USA's strategy in arming the mujahideen in Afghanistan during the first cold war; to give the Soviets their own Vietnam. A costly quagmire that consumed their wealth and military focus for years, contributing to their downfall. They've already re-employed this strategy in Syria, where a US official openly admitted they worked to create a "quagmire" for Moscow:

Twitter avatar for @aaronjmate
Aaron Maté @aaronjmate
Here is the May 2020 comment of the now former US envoy James Jeffrey that I referenced, in which he described his job in Syria as follows: "My job is to make it a quagmire for the Russians."
8:32 PM ∙ Nov 14, 2020
308Likes113Retweets

Now they're hoping to pull off the same trick again, to any extent possible. That's all this is. It's not about saving lives or stopping a war, it's about grand chessboard maneuverings to maintain US planetary domination.

Twitter avatar for @McFaul
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Ukraine will be Putin's Afghanistan.
5:55 AM ∙ Feb 28, 2022
25,276Likes2,815Retweets

This will not save lives. In fact if it is successful it will ensure the loss of a great many more as an unwinnable war drags on long after it could have been over. This doesn't benefit Ukrainians. It doesn't benefit Americans. It doesn't benefit Europeans. It only benefits the unipolarist agendas of a few powerful psychopaths.

Twitter avatar for @MSNBC
MSNBC @MSNBC
"Remember, the Russians invaded Afghanistan back in 1980," Hillary Clinton says. "It didn't end well for the Russians...but the fact is, that a very motivated, and then funded, and armed insurgency basically drove the Russians out of Afghanistan."
2:50 AM ∙ Mar 1, 2022
2,940Likes749Retweets

If you still want to support arming Ukraine on the basis that it will benefit the unipolar hegemony of a globe-spanning empire because you believe that empire's continued dominance is a good thing, be my guest. But again, don't pretend what you're cheering for is anything nobler than that.

❖

After 9/11 we were intensively bombarded with messaging about a sinister foreign leader, creating an environment of shrill hysteria that was very hard to stand up against. This was used to whip up support for pre-existing objectives of US geostrategic dominance.

Sound familiar?

Would people have consented to two back-to-back full-scale ground invasions without 9/11 and the aggressive narrative management campaign which followed? Would people have consented to economic warfare that could hurt us all and nuclear brinkmanship that could get us all killed without the Ukraine invasion and the aggressive narrative management campaign accompanying it?

It's times like these where it's most important to be intensely, aggressively skeptical of the agendas of our rulers, and unfortunately it's also times like these where you'll get yelled at the most forcefully for doing so. But we know better than to be shouted into silence now.

❖

More concerning than backing Nazi militias in Ukraine is the far more widespread, far more deadly, and equally white supremacist belief we're seeing throughout the western world that invading a nation of white people is horrific while invading a nation of brown people is normal.

❖

There are those who think maintaining a hostile client state on Russia's border is worth any amount of brinkmanship to accomplish, and then there are those who understand what nuclear war is.

❖

If these insane escalations between the US and Russia don't scare the shit out of you it's either because you don't understand them or because you are psychologically compartmentalizing away from what you do understand. It's one or the other.

We are far, far too close to the brink of an unthinkable series of events from which there is no return. And none of the loudest voices are calling for it to be scaled back. They're calling for it to escalate further. Sometimes a lot further.

Twitter avatar for @JohnAllenGay
John Allen Gay @JohnAllenGay
People said nobody was pushing for war with Russia, yet this faults Biden for not holding out the possibility of U.S. close air support:
wicker.senate.govWicker: Putin’s War on Ukraine Will Affect Us AllBiden’s Weakness Paved Way for Russian Invasion
8:36 PM ∙ Feb 28, 2022

Many influential pundits and politicians are now calling for a NATO no-fly zone in Ukraine, which would require directly attacking the Russian air force and Russian air defenses.

Twitter avatar for @jonathanvswan
Jonathan Swan @jonathanvswan
Scoop: Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky is urging President Biden and NATO to impose a "no-fly zone" over "significant parts" of the country, telling Axios in a statement that Ukraine "can beat the aggressor" if the Western allies "do their part."
axios.comZelensky urges Biden, NATO to impose “no-fly zone” over Ukraine“If the West does this, Ukraine will defeat the aggressor with much less blood.”
5:09 PM ∙ Feb 28, 2022
1,868Likes476Retweets

We're speeding toward a cliff and nobody in charge has a foot anywhere near the brake pedal. If anything, the political/media class is demanding the gas pedal be pushed to the floor.

Twitter avatar for @selectedwisdom
Clint Watts @selectedwisdom
Strangest thing - entire world watching a massive Russian armor formation plow towards Kyiv, we cheer on Ukraine, but we’re holding ourselves back. NATO Air Force could end this in 48 hrs. Understand handwringing about what Putin would do, but we can see what’s coming
9:17 PM ∙ Feb 28, 2022
15,143Likes3,529Retweets

Is what the US and its allies are trying to accomplish in Ukraine worth continually risking nuclear armageddon for? This is the single most important question in the world right now, and hardly anyone seems to be asking it.

Twitter avatar for @DPJHodges
(((Dan Hodges))) @DPJHodges
If people want to oppose a no-fly zone, fine. But understand that is an act of appeasement no different to our appeasement of Hitler in 1938. We are refusing to do what we know is morally right out of fear. We are prepared to let a free nation die to safeguard ourselves.
8:49 AM ∙ Mar 1, 2022
878Likes182Retweets

Our rulers are rolling the dice on the life of every terrestrial organism, and people are still babbling about whether Democrats or Republicans are harder on Russia and trying to score political points. Hardly anyone has their head up and their eyes fixed on what may be coming.

Twitter avatar for @RichardEngel
Richard Engel @RichardEngel
Perhaps the biggest risk-calculation/moral dilemma of the war so far. A massive Russian convoy is abt 30 miles from Kyiv. The US/NATO could likely destroy it. But that would be direct involvement against Russia and risk, everything. Does the West watch in silence as it rolls?
7:36 PM ∙ Feb 28, 2022
23,532Likes4,721Retweets

❖

If you heard something, looked outside, and saw a mushroom cloud growing in the distance, how much thought do you imagine you'd be having about the importance of NATO's open-door policy with Ukraine?

❖

Everyone's freaking out about RT when all they'd have to do to kill it is simply allow leftist and antiwar opinions on western mass media. You'd steal their entire audience. But we all know that's never going to happen because it was never actually about Russian state media; it's about silencing opponents of the official imperial narrative.

❖

Dear shitlibs,

Saying that hawkish escalations spearheaded by the most powerful empire in history led to undesirable consequences in Ukraine is not actually the same as an abuser saying "look what you made me do" and does not have "what-was-she-wearing energy."

Love, Caitlin

This criticism shows up in my online notifications literally every single time I talk about the role of the US empire in paving the way to the Ukraine invasion, and to be clear, the battered spouse and rape victim in their analogy is not Ukraine but the US empire. The poor widdle US empire. They're literally demanding that no one on the internet criticize the most dangerous actions of the most powerful and destructive government on the face of this planet. At all. It's just unbelievable that they think this is a normal and acceptable thing to do.

It's simply forbidden to talk about the role the world's largest power structure had in this conflict. You're only allowed to say it's happening solely because Putin is evil and hates freedom.

❖

"You can criticize the US empire AND Russia, Caitlin."

One of those is already being criticized at fever pitch by literally all government and mainstream media institutions in the entire western world, while the other is almost never criticized by those institutions in any meaningful way.

❖

I saw someone in the comments of a post about nuclear war say "it would be Putin's fault" if one happens. Like that would be any consolation to anyone on earth when the bombs go off. People still think about this thing in terms of political point-scoring, that's how fucked we are.

❖

Deteriorating material conditions can cause people to rise up against their government. Imperialists understand this, which is why they work to foment unrest with starvation sanctions in empire-targeted nations while at home keeping people fed just enough to prevent an uprising.

_________________________

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, following me on Facebook, Twitter, Soundcloud or YouTube, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Ko-fi, Patreon or Paypal. If you want to read more you can buy my books. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. 

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

69
Share this post

Every US Enemy Is Hitler: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

www.caitlinjohnst.one
73
Share
Previous
Next
73 Comments
Share this discussion

Every US Enemy Is Hitler: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

www.caitlinjohnst.one
Rob
Mar 1, 2022·edited Mar 19, 2022

I think that what galls me the most may be the frequent references to Ukraine as a democracy and a free country. This reflects the willful blindness of the American political and media classes, and hence the ignorance of the American people, to the fact that in 2014 the United States sponsored a coup in Ukraine that ousted a democratically elected president and replaced him with a puppet president. At the present time, that puppet is Volodymir Zelensky, but he can easily be replaced whenever the puppet master chooses. Ukraine is no more democratic than Russia. In fact, Ukraine is worse, because it has neo-Nazis and fascists in high, low and in-between places.

I came of age during the Vietnam War, and in my long life, I have witnessed my country, the USA, initiate, fight and sponsor wars that killed tens of millions of people and turned many millions more into refugees. Never do I recall the public outcry, the pulling of hair and rending of garments over suffering civilians as is occurring now over the suffering of the Ukrainian people. I, too, feel for them, but the disproportionate level of public grief (and anger) has all the trappings of crocodile tears being played to the hilt by politicians and the media. It is a classic example of mass hysteria. Where was this outpouring of emotion when the US was leveling Fallujah, Mosul and Raqqa? Goddam hypocrites!

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
5 replies
Feral Finster
Mar 1, 2022

Washington got the war it wanted, and now is prepared to fight to the last Ukrainian.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
71 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Caitlin Johnstone
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing