There are so many layers to the bullshit we endure from those that seek power over us.
.
The Holocaust card that is played by the Zionists to justify their militarism is perhaps the most ironic.
.
They rely on a Limited Hangout version of The Holocaust.
.
Here is a card you won't see them play:
.
The irony being that Zionists treated the Jews of Europe like "dust in a cruel world" - Chaim Weizmann.
.
The Zionists tricked hundreds of thousands (more?) onto the trains to the concentration camp(s) in full knowledge of their fate. And then Israel defended the treachery with the full force of their justice system.
The full irony is that before October 7th Zionists presented themselves as protectors of Jews,
despite their known history of betrayal and treachery. Even becoming the main beneficiary of the Holocaust through political extortion and the attraction of immigrants.
.
Jews should have seen the treachery, betrayal and so-called "failure" of October 7th coming. They had put their faith in those whose history is one of betraying their own.
.
When the leader of Hungarian Zionists was, in essence*, put on trial in Israel for tricking hundreds of thousands
onto the trains to Auschwitz, because he was an official of the reigning administration, the Attorney General of Israel was his personal lawyer.
.
In court, Chaim Cohen, Attorney General of Israel, will declaim Weizmann’s "dust in a cruel world" ideology to Judge Halevi in defense of Rudolf Kastner:
.
“For those and millions of Jews like them there came true the old curse, ‘And lo, they were meant but to be taken like sheep for slaughter, for killing, for destruction, for crushing and shame.’ These should escape? They had no feet on which to run. They should revolt? They had no hands with which to fight. No spirit was left in them.”
.
The betrayers lost their first trial so they kicked it upstairs to the Israeli Supreme Court
where the political balance was in their favor and the court affirmed Weizmann's "dust in a cruel world" ideology
ruling that it was alright for the betrayers to do what they had done, "the Jews of Hungary were not worth saving" [one of the judges
said these words]
.
Does this remind you of the panicked participants of the October 7th Rave Party who attempted to flee but were blocked at the exits by "Israeli police", and then Hannibal-ed by Apache helicopter. A Rave Party located 3 miles
from the prison walls of Gaza...make that a RE-located Rave Party. The Party had been RE-located on instructions from IDF headquarter, overruling the Gaza sector officers normally tasked with such approvals. RE-located to a position between Gaza and a **named target** the Re'im Military Base. It was Re-located on October 5th; October 7th was a Sabbath and Jewish holiday, so half the IDF around Gaza was given leave. Mossad had captured Hamas' detailed plan for their jail break and it specified the Re'im military base as a target and it said that Hamas would conduct their jail break on a Sabbath or Jewish holiday, October 7th was both of these.
---
*Kastner was the plaintiff, but the trial quickly turned into an indictment of Kastner and his fellow traitors.
The truth seems Googled out of existence. Immediately afterwards, multiple reputable sources reported the change in venue, days before the rave. As an ex-skydiver and solo mountaineer, I wondered how Oct 7 was rehearsed and engineered, one doesn't go from nada to experienced flier-in-the-sky without months of flying time. This wasn't observed by anyone?
To this day, MSM, and even RT rehashes the "1200 deaths" without stating the obvious, that half of those were murdered by IDF. My memory is excellent; that venue was changed. On purpose.
But hardly anyone is doing investigative journalism, and common sense questions like mine, are left unanswered. It's up to courageous voices like Caitlin's and Scott Ritter etc, to search for, and state, the truth. And the answer is always "the Global American Empire."
>>"Israel let it happen, made it happen, so as to create a pretext for Genocide."
Nope, Israel did not intentionally let it happen, and also DID NOT make it happen. I know a lot of people believe/think otherwise (including Caitlin), but critical thinking and a deeper examination of the logic (and cause/effect repercussions) points to different conclusions/theories.
Dude you are very seriously out of touch with reality and history. Please educate yourself and stop with this shit. Substack readers are a lot better informed than Facebook normies. Take you shit elsewhere.
Nothing in your comment contains a rebuttal to my assertions, just ad-hominem attacks. Critical thinking and argumentation much? Is this how you engage in conversations?
chokaski is with the govt and security apparatus as far as any "conspiracy theory" consistently refusing to answer the question. So I keep pressing chokaski on the matter that is so clear nothing can be clearer. That is, the JFK assassination.
Of course the Hannibal Directive is a real thing. It is VERY REAL. It has also been put into action - including in Israel's response to Oct 7th.
Why is it so difficult for people to undertand that "Israel is NOT that great and exceptional at SECURITY and INTELLIGENCE" ? Has the world been propagandized and gaslighted about Israel's capabilities?
Oct. 7th was a complete failure on the part of Israel. Not only were they unable to prevent the attack (inspite of multiple warnings from different sources), their hubris and overconfidence led them to lose focus at critical security junctures (including less presence of IDF forces in the area - as many had been repositioned to focus on the resettlements in the West Bank).
Israel FAILED completely and miserably on Oct.7th and ever since including the present. It has taken wrong actions and decisions that have not only led to a Genocide, but will eventually destroy Israel itself (I'm hoping) and take the US along with it (I'm hoping this too).
The Oct. 7th attack is PROOF that Israel is "not that great" or "secure" as people assumed it to be. They failed on Intelligence, Security, Communication, Coordination, Logistics, Chain of command protocols, lack of preparadness, excessive hubris, lack of contigency planning, lack of adequate training (i.e. poorly trained IDF personnel), lack of foresight, lack of realization about blowback for 75+ years of ethnic cleansing and apartheid and abuse, underestimation of Hamas's capabilities, AND SO MANY OTHER FAILURES.
Oct. 7th proved to the world (and shattered beyond any doubt) the "ILLUSION OF SUPERIORITY" of Israel and the Zionists.
Why is it so hard for people to believe that ISRAEL "failed" due to its own mistakes, hubris, etc.? Have people been that propagandized by Israel's FAKE strength and power that they think Hamas, Gaza, or the Palestinians are not capable of such an attack based on their own strengths and ingenuity?
Jill Stein IS on the ballot in most states though the Democrats have done everything in their power to kick her off and to ignore & marginalize her candidacy. Voting for Jill is one way to make a statement in support of peace, economuc justice & environmental sanity during this travesty of an election. The more who vote for her, the more powerful that statement becomes. It’s not the revolution but it’s a start.
It's not just the Democrats who have done everything in their power to kick her off the ballot and who choose to ignore and marginalize her candidacy. It's also our "free press" and the industrial news complex.
The leadership of the Democratic party have decided that they would rather lose the 2024 presidential election and face the prospect of a second Trump presidency than oppose the Palestinian genocide. If the Kamala Harris loses the 2024 election it will be because of the actions she and her party took (or didn't take) and the policies that she and her party advocated for (or didn't advocate for).
Slight correction: if the Democratic party opposes the Palestinian genocide - that will also cause them to lose the election. Unfortunately, there is more to be lost by opposing the Genocide than supporting it (for both parties). These are just the cold, hard, facts - I hate them, deplore them, am not voting for the unipolar duopoly - but this reality is unavoidable.
The Democratic base doesn’t like the genocide so Harris would fare better not worse if she just mouthed the right words. Turnout is everything. But Jill is so far better than either of these candidates - it’s not even close - I’d support her anyway.
It's not the "Democratic base" that doesn't like the genocide. It's a segment of it. The Democratic base is huge and factioned and has multiple different interests. Most of the "liberals" care about themselves and America, not Palestine (or the Genocide) - unfortunately. Mouthing the right words would lose her support (due to the influence of the Israel lobbies) rather than gain her support. That's just the numbers.
Yes, Jill Stein is the way to go (my preference too).
The Democratic Party may well have placed themselves in a "no win" situation with regards to the presidential elections. They have become overly dependent on support from both pro-Palestine and pro-Israel factions of voters and may be unable to win the election without the support of both. (Based on their current position they lack support among the pro-Palestine faction.)
It appears that, at present, pro-Palestine sentiments are rising and pro-Israel sentiments are declining (even among Jews). Pragmatism would suggest that support for Palestine would be the best position to adopt with regards to the long-term future of the party (and of the United States). Moreover, history will judge Israel and its supporters much more harshly and critically than Palestine and its supporters. If the Democratic Party supports Palestine and loses the support of the Pro-Israel faction resulting in a presidential loss, they will at least have lost for the right reasons. At present they are content to lose for the wrong reasons.
Then, again, Trump is such an appallingly bad candidate there's still plenty of time for him to shoot himself in the foot (yet again) and throw the election to Harris (who might be able to peel off a few more Trump voters). Stein is certainly the best option at his point.
dems have long painted themselves in a corner by tying their boat to israel and zionism. politically they can not make that turn anymore. losing for the wrong reasons it will be, imo, that is, if the pro-palestine faction is as large and principled as claimed. (but indeed sometimes repubs don't look very eager to win the election either).
I have no arguement with you and what you say in the comment. Here are some things to reflect on:
(1) We common people don't have access to the same level of data that campaigns have. What "OUR evaluation of sentiment is" will be different from what the campaigns will have.
(2) What is the strength of the correlation between "sentiment" and "voting for a particular candidate"? Does anyone know? i.e. Do we know that "sentiments" on this issue will override other interests?
Vote for Stein if you're not in a swing state. The environment, reproductive rights, healthcare, social security and Medicare, etc. will all suffer if the orange cretin wins. And the international grotesqueries will not end regardless.
Vote for Stein if you ARE in a swing state. Vote for Stein as if you were living in a fantasy alternate reality and you somehow knew that your vote would be the one to tip the election.
Exactly. Best outcome would be to swing MI and maybe WI --- and thus the election --- to Trump because Palestinian-American and other Muslim voters voted Green and therefore were the dagger into the heart of pure duopoly control. Doesn't matter that Trump wins -- he's unpredictable, might stop Ukraine and everyone will adapt to whatever. Matters more to have a 3rd party be the big influencer even the determiner of the election, a gigantic "fuck you duopoly, you're not alone in the driver's seat any more". Big shock to the society is much more important in the long run than who continues to oversee the flushing of the empire down the toilet for the next 4 years.
Aw cmon', Jenny, of course it us, thank goodness. I just want to revel in the process, to salivate as both wings of the retarded bird with unduly bright feathers (US society's all glitz, no substance) might come to even the remotest realization that life won't simply go on without interruption to their sinister delights. Call me either a cockeyed optimist or a delusional old man. Either way, I wish i miei genitori erano rimasti in Italia, that I'd been a citizen of somewhere other than the empire.
Double hater here. Wishing both candidates and parties failure. How could I possibly vote for either when I want neither. Duck this bullshit calculus of lesser evil. Evil is evil in any degree.
Well said, Ann. If you want to think of it as a "protest vote" or making a statement of how much you want an end to the genocide in Gaza, I encourage all American voters to vote for Jill Stein. Even if you have to write her name in, just do it. In Nevada, where the Supreme Court overturned the first court's decision to allow the Green Party on the ballot and where you can't write a name in on your ballot, you can vote "None of the Above". Really, Nevadans have this option. I encourage them to do so. There's no reason to endorse genocide and endless bloodshed and ecocide. #VoteNoneOfTheAboveNevada #JillStein2024
Of course Putin and Assad are war criminals, as are so many heads of state of so many countries - including Westerns countries (the US being foremost), African countries, Asian countries, etc.
It's actually quite easy to find a head of state that IS a war criminal. Almost EVERY US President has been a war criminal.
To assume that just because the US/West are bad/evil that that somehow makes the opposition good (Russia, China, Iran, whatever) is naive thinking at best, delusional illusions at worst. There really isn't a GOOD/BAD, black-and-white manichean thinking that applies here. It is all shades of grey.
ISIS was 15 kilometers from Damascus before Russia intervened in Syria. The scope of such disaster if it would have taken is immeasurable. Just saying.
I'm not talking about any individual events. I don't have much trust in ANYTHING the West says - and think critically about all their claims. I don't believe Western propaganda about the Syrian chemical attack.
I'm looking at history over an extended period of time and multiple events, relationships between different variables, geopolitical and sociological factors, and so much more.
Chang Chokaski, I am sorry to find you straying from your own "critical thinking". You are going on a "victim bashing " exercise. Russia and Syria are not under threat from a Putin or Assad - they are under threat from a "globe spanning empire" (to quote Caitlin). To equate Putin and Assad as war criminals on a par with the obvious war criminals is being mischievous at best and irresponsible at worst. What do you recommend? For them to succumb to US/ NATO/ WEST and stop being " war criminals", according to your logical thinking? " Naive thinking at best, delusional illusions at worst".
The most burning question of the time is the US empire and its vassal states being hell bent on a trajectory of destroying the world and parts of the human race. We are here with Caitlin because of that existential threat. Haven't we watched in horror and empathy the extermination of the Palestinian people? Israel and its backers weaponising the means of survival? Water, food, shelter and medicine.
Testing more and more menacing weapons which will explode in your hands. Re-recolonising the Global South. Settler colonialism has to be defended at all costs. No other nation or race can be allowed to enrich the lives of their people and prosper. Those who tries to liberate their people from empire are called "terrorists". Their leaders "war criminals".
Remember Caitlin's past Newsletter about the burning building? And my oft repeated Bertolt Brecht's poem " The Buddha's Parable of the Burning House". We are in a burning house and without escaping from it, we indulge in inane hypothesis.
chokaski account reveals itself as a subtle shill for the establishment if one looks closely and yet folks fail to notice despite it having made quite a few blunders in the past. This one was just too obvious.
Good luck with the upcoming assault of the chief logician and the most critical of thinkers in the whole wide universe.
Almost ALL heads of state are WAR CRIMINALS - almost EVERY US President. It doesn't matter which side they're on (or which side you're on). There is a certain criteria and methodology for evaluating "what a war crime is" and who "a war criminal is".
And if you're wondering WHY I'm commenting about this, because that IS the discussion in this thread - the comments made by Jill Stein - which are HONEST - and I commend her for having the courage to speak the TRUTH. She (Jill Stein) knows that Biden, Harris, Trump, Zelensky, Netanyahu, etc. are ALSO war criminals (and more prominent ones IMO), but admitting that would be political suicide, career suicide, and quite possibly the end of the green party.
This is NOT about East Vs. West or North Vs. Global South, or "who I like" vs. "who you like". By now, you should realize that I am vehemently against the US Empire in EVERY WAY. That still doesn't change any facts about who is and is not a war criminal. Question everything, and then think critically about what you find.
Indu, I am going to deconstruct your comment, as all you've shown with it is an emotional reaction with no critical thinking or logic.
>>"Russia and Syria are not under threat from a Putin or Assad"
Who said that? Did I say Russia and Syria are under threat from Putin or Assad?
Read my comment again.
>>"To equate Putin and Assad as war criminals on a par with the obvious war criminals is being mischievous at best and irresponsible at worst."
WRONG! A war criminal IS a war criminal - regardless of whatever one's confirmation biases are. And in terms of "on par" -> who is comparing the level of war criminality here? Read my comment again.
>>"What do you recommend? For them to succumb to US/ NATO/ WEST and stop being " war criminals", according to your logical thinking?"
I'm not recommending anything. I am stating facts. You (or anyone else) can choose to ignore them if you/they wish. Who is suggesting anything about "stopping being war criminals"? Where did you get that idea from? You assume too much.
What does the FACT that Putin and Assad (and so many others including heads of State of multiple countries) ARE war criminals have to do with Caitlin's articles or existential threats? Are you uncomfortable with TRUTHS that go against your belief systems? That's a "YOU" problem, not a "reality of events" issue. Don't cover your head in the sand.
None of your statements have anything to do with my assertions (that have ample of evidence if you search the web without confirmation bias) about War Criminals. It seems this is an emotional rant against "your version of reality" being confronted with cognitive dissonance.
Do you know what a war crime is? (The official definition). If so, it is easy to ascertain who the war criminals would be in any scenario. Making a case in a court of law is a different issue.
>>"We are in a burning house and without escaping from it, we indulge in inane hypothesis."
There is no hypothesis here.
You need to do your own due diligence and research, and not "conform" because you "belong" to a community.
>>"Chang, I am dismayed , disappointed and spent."
Again, what relevance is there to that? I am not here to please you and stick to opinions that are acceptable to you. This is again a "YOU" problem.
You are blind in your faith if you believe that Assad and Putin are NOT War criminals. You think they are good guys? There are NO good guys in such positions of power. That is the reality.
Here is something you can do to correct your perceptions:
(1) Do a search on "Putin war criminal evidence" - and then follow the sources and evidence
(2) Do a search on "Assad war criminal evidence" - and similarly follow up on what you find
Don't be blind to the reality and propaganda (as many Americans are, as many Israelis are, as MOST humans are). Seek out evidence even if it goes against your beliefs - that is, of course, if you care about the TRUTH.
"What does the FACT that Putin and Assad (and so many others including heads of State of multiple countries) ARE war criminals " - an utter scumbag you are chokaski a disgusting piece of shit a fucking shill. offering links with "facts" from corrupt western controlled organizations. yeah right keep going chokaski.
Every WAR has war crimes. There has never been any war that does NOT have war crimes. Whether people have been prosecuted for them or not is a separate but related issue. Have you ever heard of a war/conflict without war crimes? War crimes are commited by both sides (or all parties). This is not a choice or a conscious decision. This is what happens in war. The definition of "WHAT constitutes a war crime" is too broad and general.
Here are just some links (you can find more if you wish):
Almost ALL heads of state are WAR CRIMINALS - almost EVERY US President. It doesn't matter which side they're on (or which side you're on). There is a certain criteria and methodology for evaluating "what a war crime is" and who "a war criminal is".
(1) Do a search on "Putin war criminal evidence" - and then follow the sources and evidence
(2) Do a search on "Assad war criminal evidence" - and similarly follow up on what you find
I am NOT implying that Assad or Putin should be charged for war crimes OR be served ICC arrest warrants. I am saying, by the broad and loose definition of "what a war crime constitutes" it is exceedingly easy for tens of thousands of people (heads of state and soldiers,military, etc.) to be labeled as "war criminals".
But the label of "war criminals" doesn't signify much, as EVERY US PRESIDENT (or almost EVERY) has been a WAR CRIMINAL. Again, I'm not making comparisons or measuring magnitudes here.
Firstly the links provided, including the UN and Amnesty are hardly credible, very biased on the MSM, US empire side of things. Ukraine has a propaganda dept on a par with the Nazi's in WWII. Mariupol atrocities, Bucha massacres, Donetsk bombings, kidnapping of children and many others all fabricated and manipulated by the same.
The question is what constitutes a war crime ? No doubt Russian military have committed some bad shit, but would say it pales in comparison to the Azov militias and Georgian led foreign mercenaries have carried out.
Basically the West, the CIA and MSM have co-ordinated in a very sophistcated propaganda operation against Russia in particular.
>>"Basically the West, the CIA and MSM have co-ordinated in a very sophistcated propaganda operation against Russia in particular."
I don't think anyone doubts that. That is a given.
>>"but would say it pales in comparison to the Azov militias and Georgian led foreign mercenaries have carried out."
I agree!
>>" Ukraine has a propaganda dept on a par with the Nazi's in WWII"
Again, I agree!
I am NOT COMPARING war crimes. I am saying EVERYONE commits them. Stemming from that logic, from a strictly logical perspective, THUS war crimes are commited by ALL parties involved (this should be pretty obvious by now).
>>"including the UN and Amnesty are hardly credible"
Who judges what is credible or not? You? Me? Russians? Ukrainians? Americans? Chinese? Saudi Arabian? Iranians? Israelites? You see where I'm going with this. Amnesty International (and Human Rights Watch) are some of the MORE credible sources. Do a search for war crimes by Putin and Assad for those sources (if that is your preference).
I saw tons of posts on X suddenly declaring that after supporting Stein for years they suddenly all turned on her. I believe most of those posts were trolls, sponsored either by the Democrats (most likely) or disaffected Republicans. The quickness with which lots of people followed suit was a true indication of nonserious voters who don't look deeply at facts and just bandwagon jump.
Which in turn raises the question of why Biden doesn't want a ceasefire, especially as Russia has been, since Day One, ready to offer peace on lenient terms.
They see every Russian death as worth the two million dollars they are paying for it. They hate all foreigners -- well, maybe cute little Ireland is OK -- so they also see every Ukrainian death as a plus. Who wants a ceasefire.
President Truman, one of the worst state terrorists in history when he MUDRERED around 200,000 almost totally innocent Japanese civilians when Japan refused to surrender their human rights under an UNCONDITIONAL surrender created by FDR
Japan was actually looking to surrender when Truman made that demand
I think the same thing can be said of just about any Western Government. This is tne one world government in action and I believe the main drivers are the oligarchs in the U.S.A. How few people notice that the U.N. is located in the U.S. It is part and parcel of the same power mongers. Only by dissolving the U.N.,, the WHO and the WEF and probably several other perverted organizations will people begin to be free again.
I'm not quite sure dissolving these organizations is the only way out of the control the empire has on things, but getting the U.N. out of the U.S. is definitely a good start. Perhaps choosing one of the poorest countries on the planet might be something to consider, if only as a symbol that power doesn't always have to be embedded with MONEY .... .
I believe it is the only answer. These organizations have been coopted or have since their inception been a part of the problem. Think about the U.S. civil war that stole the rights of states to opt out of the Union. This is exactly what is happening with the attempts by the U.N. and WHO to gain more power. It is also why BRICS looks so appealing to so many countries that have been so exploited.
"Israel apologists have been amazingly defensive about its latest acts of terrorism in Lebanon." Yes. The top headline at this moment on The Gateway Pundit refers to the pager explosions as "Israel's Creative Attack on Hezbollah". Creative? I guess Hitler was pretty creative too, if we want to destroy another word in the English language. I feel literally sick over the brutality of the human race.
If they were letter bombs they would have been just as indiscriminate and still called “creative” and “targeted” by the same racist, vacuous morons. Ignore them.
The U.S. (not just Biden) has an extremely long history of not holding Israel accountable. Watch the 26 minute documentary in this article (scroll down) of Israel getting away with spying on the U.S.
I didn't find much here I would disagree with. It's beyond time that people stop idolizing the Jews. Christians especially need to remember that twice in their ancient history God allowed their enemies to sack Jerusalem and cart the nobility off. Are we facing such another time now?
Unfortunately, the Jews (>80%) are equating their ethnicity with Zionism. I wish this wasn’t true. This in itself will trigger real antisemitism. I cry for them because they are so smart and so kind generally but so wrong on this issue! Victims of propaganda also
And Israel didn't "fail" to anticipate Hamas' jail break from Gaza on October 7, 2023.
Israel let it happen, made it happen, so as to create a pretext for Genocide.
There are so many layers to the bullshit we endure from those that seek power over us.
.
The Holocaust card that is played by the Zionists to justify their militarism is perhaps the most ironic.
.
They rely on a Limited Hangout version of The Holocaust.
.
Here is a card you won't see them play:
.
The irony being that Zionists treated the Jews of Europe like "dust in a cruel world" - Chaim Weizmann.
.
The Zionists tricked hundreds of thousands (more?) onto the trains to the concentration camp(s) in full knowledge of their fate. And then Israel defended the treachery with the full force of their justice system.
The full irony is that before October 7th Zionists presented themselves as protectors of Jews,
despite their known history of betrayal and treachery. Even becoming the main beneficiary of the Holocaust through political extortion and the attraction of immigrants.
.
Jews should have seen the treachery, betrayal and so-called "failure" of October 7th coming. They had put their faith in those whose history is one of betraying their own.
.
When the leader of Hungarian Zionists was, in essence*, put on trial in Israel for tricking hundreds of thousands
onto the trains to Auschwitz, because he was an official of the reigning administration, the Attorney General of Israel was his personal lawyer.
.
In court, Chaim Cohen, Attorney General of Israel, will declaim Weizmann’s "dust in a cruel world" ideology to Judge Halevi in defense of Rudolf Kastner:
.
“For those and millions of Jews like them there came true the old curse, ‘And lo, they were meant but to be taken like sheep for slaughter, for killing, for destruction, for crushing and shame.’ These should escape? They had no feet on which to run. They should revolt? They had no hands with which to fight. No spirit was left in them.”
.
The betrayers lost their first trial so they kicked it upstairs to the Israeli Supreme Court
where the political balance was in their favor and the court affirmed Weizmann's "dust in a cruel world" ideology
ruling that it was alright for the betrayers to do what they had done, "the Jews of Hungary were not worth saving" [one of the judges
said these words]
.
Does this remind you of the panicked participants of the October 7th Rave Party who attempted to flee but were blocked at the exits by "Israeli police", and then Hannibal-ed by Apache helicopter. A Rave Party located 3 miles
from the prison walls of Gaza...make that a RE-located Rave Party. The Party had been RE-located on instructions from IDF headquarter, overruling the Gaza sector officers normally tasked with such approvals. RE-located to a position between Gaza and a **named target** the Re'im Military Base. It was Re-located on October 5th; October 7th was a Sabbath and Jewish holiday, so half the IDF around Gaza was given leave. Mossad had captured Hamas' detailed plan for their jail break and it specified the Re'im military base as a target and it said that Hamas would conduct their jail break on a Sabbath or Jewish holiday, October 7th was both of these.
---
*Kastner was the plaintiff, but the trial quickly turned into an indictment of Kastner and his fellow traitors.
Please share your sources for this. I think we all want to read about this trial in it’s entirety.
Jonathan Cook links to 2 articles that back up his comment.
A guy escaped from Auschwitz and warned the Hungarian government of what was happening there, but it was covered up.
https://jonathancook.substack.com/p/jonathan-freedland-rewrites-history?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=476450&post_id=148086514&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=pcevt&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Cleaned link: https://jonathancook.substack.com/p/jonathan-freedland-rewrites-history
real hurtful chokaski you wont clean my links
In these books you'll find that and much more:
- https://archive.org/details/zionisminageofdi0000bren
- https://archive.org/details/brenner-lenni-51-documents-zionist-collaboration-with-the-nazis_202012
Can you source your information for the rave party being relocated? Thank you.
The truth seems Googled out of existence. Immediately afterwards, multiple reputable sources reported the change in venue, days before the rave. As an ex-skydiver and solo mountaineer, I wondered how Oct 7 was rehearsed and engineered, one doesn't go from nada to experienced flier-in-the-sky without months of flying time. This wasn't observed by anyone?
To this day, MSM, and even RT rehashes the "1200 deaths" without stating the obvious, that half of those were murdered by IDF. My memory is excellent; that venue was changed. On purpose.
But hardly anyone is doing investigative journalism, and common sense questions like mine, are left unanswered. It's up to courageous voices like Caitlin's and Scott Ritter etc, to search for, and state, the truth. And the answer is always "the Global American Empire."
Just found your post.
Especially busy today, there is an additional source that I would like to supply.
Here is Haaretz, Israel's "paper of record".
https://archive.is/9msVK
It mentions Route 232 but it leaves out that Route 232 is what Hamas would have to take to drive to the Re'im military base. Check a map.
The Rave Party was RE-located to a site on Route 232 that is between Gaza and the Re'im military base. The party was three miles from Gaza.
There is a source that is more specific.
I think Haaretz will more than suffice.
Here is the direct link.
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-12-25/ty-article/.premium/idf-allowed-rave-later-attacked-by-hamas-despite-key-officers-concern/0000018c-9d78-ddc3-a1bf-bf7edca30000
>>"Israel let it happen, made it happen, so as to create a pretext for Genocide."
Nope, Israel did not intentionally let it happen, and also DID NOT make it happen. I know a lot of people believe/think otherwise (including Caitlin), but critical thinking and a deeper examination of the logic (and cause/effect repercussions) points to different conclusions/theories.
Dude you are very seriously out of touch with reality and history. Please educate yourself and stop with this shit. Substack readers are a lot better informed than Facebook normies. Take you shit elsewhere.
Nothing in your comment contains a rebuttal to my assertions, just ad-hominem attacks. Critical thinking and argumentation much? Is this how you engage in conversations?
Only with idf trolls such as yourself. Not my job to school you. You support genocide. Fuck off.
??? How did you jump to a conclusion such as "I support Genocide"? Is there any logic (or supporting evidence) in your statements?
Who killed JFK?
Israel
chokaski is with the govt and security apparatus as far as any "conspiracy theory" consistently refusing to answer the question. So I keep pressing chokaski on the matter that is so clear nothing can be clearer. That is, the JFK assassination.
Arabs can’t fight a traditional war. They’re mostly illiterate. I’m a liberal non Jew. Jews are far more intelligent and educated. Ask Hezbollah.
Israel cannot fight urban jungle guerrilla warfare. You're smug and happy being wrong.
Provide evidence for those words, I guess you dont think the Hannibal Directive is a real thing either ?
Of course the Hannibal Directive is a real thing. It is VERY REAL. It has also been put into action - including in Israel's response to Oct 7th.
Why is it so difficult for people to undertand that "Israel is NOT that great and exceptional at SECURITY and INTELLIGENCE" ? Has the world been propagandized and gaslighted about Israel's capabilities?
Oct. 7th was a complete failure on the part of Israel. Not only were they unable to prevent the attack (inspite of multiple warnings from different sources), their hubris and overconfidence led them to lose focus at critical security junctures (including less presence of IDF forces in the area - as many had been repositioned to focus on the resettlements in the West Bank).
Israel FAILED completely and miserably on Oct.7th and ever since including the present. It has taken wrong actions and decisions that have not only led to a Genocide, but will eventually destroy Israel itself (I'm hoping) and take the US along with it (I'm hoping this too).
The Oct. 7th attack is PROOF that Israel is "not that great" or "secure" as people assumed it to be. They failed on Intelligence, Security, Communication, Coordination, Logistics, Chain of command protocols, lack of preparadness, excessive hubris, lack of contigency planning, lack of adequate training (i.e. poorly trained IDF personnel), lack of foresight, lack of realization about blowback for 75+ years of ethnic cleansing and apartheid and abuse, underestimation of Hamas's capabilities, AND SO MANY OTHER FAILURES.
Oct. 7th proved to the world (and shattered beyond any doubt) the "ILLUSION OF SUPERIORITY" of Israel and the Zionists.
Why is it so hard for people to believe that ISRAEL "failed" due to its own mistakes, hubris, etc.? Have people been that propagandized by Israel's FAKE strength and power that they think Hamas, Gaza, or the Palestinians are not capable of such an attack based on their own strengths and ingenuity?
Also for Netanyahu to save his own ass as he was facing a trial with potential jail time.
Jill Stein IS on the ballot in most states though the Democrats have done everything in their power to kick her off and to ignore & marginalize her candidacy. Voting for Jill is one way to make a statement in support of peace, economuc justice & environmental sanity during this travesty of an election. The more who vote for her, the more powerful that statement becomes. It’s not the revolution but it’s a start.
It's not just the Democrats who have done everything in their power to kick her off the ballot and who choose to ignore and marginalize her candidacy. It's also our "free press" and the industrial news complex.
The leadership of the Democratic party have decided that they would rather lose the 2024 presidential election and face the prospect of a second Trump presidency than oppose the Palestinian genocide. If the Kamala Harris loses the 2024 election it will be because of the actions she and her party took (or didn't take) and the policies that she and her party advocated for (or didn't advocate for).
Slight correction: if the Democratic party opposes the Palestinian genocide - that will also cause them to lose the election. Unfortunately, there is more to be lost by opposing the Genocide than supporting it (for both parties). These are just the cold, hard, facts - I hate them, deplore them, am not voting for the unipolar duopoly - but this reality is unavoidable.
The Democratic base doesn’t like the genocide so Harris would fare better not worse if she just mouthed the right words. Turnout is everything. But Jill is so far better than either of these candidates - it’s not even close - I’d support her anyway.
It's not the "Democratic base" that doesn't like the genocide. It's a segment of it. The Democratic base is huge and factioned and has multiple different interests. Most of the "liberals" care about themselves and America, not Palestine (or the Genocide) - unfortunately. Mouthing the right words would lose her support (due to the influence of the Israel lobbies) rather than gain her support. That's just the numbers.
Yes, Jill Stein is the way to go (my preference too).
The Democratic Party may well have placed themselves in a "no win" situation with regards to the presidential elections. They have become overly dependent on support from both pro-Palestine and pro-Israel factions of voters and may be unable to win the election without the support of both. (Based on their current position they lack support among the pro-Palestine faction.)
It appears that, at present, pro-Palestine sentiments are rising and pro-Israel sentiments are declining (even among Jews). Pragmatism would suggest that support for Palestine would be the best position to adopt with regards to the long-term future of the party (and of the United States). Moreover, history will judge Israel and its supporters much more harshly and critically than Palestine and its supporters. If the Democratic Party supports Palestine and loses the support of the Pro-Israel faction resulting in a presidential loss, they will at least have lost for the right reasons. At present they are content to lose for the wrong reasons.
Then, again, Trump is such an appallingly bad candidate there's still plenty of time for him to shoot himself in the foot (yet again) and throw the election to Harris (who might be able to peel off a few more Trump voters). Stein is certainly the best option at his point.
dems have long painted themselves in a corner by tying their boat to israel and zionism. politically they can not make that turn anymore. losing for the wrong reasons it will be, imo, that is, if the pro-palestine faction is as large and principled as claimed. (but indeed sometimes repubs don't look very eager to win the election either).
I have no arguement with you and what you say in the comment. Here are some things to reflect on:
(1) We common people don't have access to the same level of data that campaigns have. What "OUR evaluation of sentiment is" will be different from what the campaigns will have.
(2) What is the strength of the correlation between "sentiment" and "voting for a particular candidate"? Does anyone know? i.e. Do we know that "sentiments" on this issue will override other interests?
Vote for Stein if you're not in a swing state. The environment, reproductive rights, healthcare, social security and Medicare, etc. will all suffer if the orange cretin wins. And the international grotesqueries will not end regardless.
Vote for Stein if you ARE in a swing state. Vote for Stein as if you were living in a fantasy alternate reality and you somehow knew that your vote would be the one to tip the election.
Exactly. Best outcome would be to swing MI and maybe WI --- and thus the election --- to Trump because Palestinian-American and other Muslim voters voted Green and therefore were the dagger into the heart of pure duopoly control. Doesn't matter that Trump wins -- he's unpredictable, might stop Ukraine and everyone will adapt to whatever. Matters more to have a 3rd party be the big influencer even the determiner of the election, a gigantic "fuck you duopoly, you're not alone in the driver's seat any more". Big shock to the society is much more important in the long run than who continues to oversee the flushing of the empire down the toilet for the next 4 years.
US is already 'flushed out' the west is losing!
Aw cmon', Jenny, of course it us, thank goodness. I just want to revel in the process, to salivate as both wings of the retarded bird with unduly bright feathers (US society's all glitz, no substance) might come to even the remotest realization that life won't simply go on without interruption to their sinister delights. Call me either a cockeyed optimist or a delusional old man. Either way, I wish i miei genitori erano rimasti in Italia, that I'd been a citizen of somewhere other than the empire.
Moi aussi. But after 4 countries I am NO optimist.
Exactly!
Vote for Stein, especially if you are in a swing state. Make it hurt.
Leverage is worthless if you refuse to use it
And you just can't bring yourself to being honest and proclaim: Vote Blue No Matter Who™. Gaslighting shitlib turd.
Go to hell, evil demon.
No you misunderstand. And I say be a man and don't vote at all.
SO? You vote Blue? Nothing changes in US elections.
Double hater here. Wishing both candidates and parties failure. How could I possibly vote for either when I want neither. Duck this bullshit calculus of lesser evil. Evil is evil in any degree.
Well said, Ann. If you want to think of it as a "protest vote" or making a statement of how much you want an end to the genocide in Gaza, I encourage all American voters to vote for Jill Stein. Even if you have to write her name in, just do it. In Nevada, where the Supreme Court overturned the first court's decision to allow the Green Party on the ballot and where you can't write a name in on your ballot, you can vote "None of the Above". Really, Nevadans have this option. I encourage them to do so. There's no reason to endorse genocide and endless bloodshed and ecocide. #VoteNoneOfTheAboveNevada #JillStein2024
She came out yesterday and claimed Putin & Assad are war criminals.
Don’t trust any of these politicians or mainstream commentators, they are all scum reciting CIA & deep state scripts.
Of course Putin and Assad are war criminals, as are so many heads of state of so many countries - including Westerns countries (the US being foremost), African countries, Asian countries, etc.
It's actually quite easy to find a head of state that IS a war criminal. Almost EVERY US President has been a war criminal.
To assume that just because the US/West are bad/evil that that somehow makes the opposition good (Russia, China, Iran, whatever) is naive thinking at best, delusional illusions at worst. There really isn't a GOOD/BAD, black-and-white manichean thinking that applies here. It is all shades of grey.
ISIS was 15 kilometers from Damascus before Russia intervened in Syria. The scope of such disaster if it would have taken is immeasurable. Just saying.
I'm not talking about any individual events. I don't have much trust in ANYTHING the West says - and think critically about all their claims. I don't believe Western propaganda about the Syrian chemical attack.
I'm looking at history over an extended period of time and multiple events, relationships between different variables, geopolitical and sociological factors, and so much more.
The fact she folded under pressure to get a few more votes is a suspect in my book.
Who are you talking about? What are you talking about?
Aaron Mate of the Grayzone completely debunked the so called Syrian chemical attack.
Yes, and I agree with them. I am not questioning the Syrian chemical attack.
"Of course Putin and Assad are war criminals" - proof, quick, chokaski.
Chang Chokaski, I am sorry to find you straying from your own "critical thinking". You are going on a "victim bashing " exercise. Russia and Syria are not under threat from a Putin or Assad - they are under threat from a "globe spanning empire" (to quote Caitlin). To equate Putin and Assad as war criminals on a par with the obvious war criminals is being mischievous at best and irresponsible at worst. What do you recommend? For them to succumb to US/ NATO/ WEST and stop being " war criminals", according to your logical thinking? " Naive thinking at best, delusional illusions at worst".
The most burning question of the time is the US empire and its vassal states being hell bent on a trajectory of destroying the world and parts of the human race. We are here with Caitlin because of that existential threat. Haven't we watched in horror and empathy the extermination of the Palestinian people? Israel and its backers weaponising the means of survival? Water, food, shelter and medicine.
Testing more and more menacing weapons which will explode in your hands. Re-recolonising the Global South. Settler colonialism has to be defended at all costs. No other nation or race can be allowed to enrich the lives of their people and prosper. Those who tries to liberate their people from empire are called "terrorists". Their leaders "war criminals".
Remember Caitlin's past Newsletter about the burning building? And my oft repeated Bertolt Brecht's poem " The Buddha's Parable of the Burning House". We are in a burning house and without escaping from it, we indulge in inane hypothesis.
Chang, I am dismayed , disappointed and spent.
chokaski account reveals itself as a subtle shill for the establishment if one looks closely and yet folks fail to notice despite it having made quite a few blunders in the past. This one was just too obvious.
Good luck with the upcoming assault of the chief logician and the most critical of thinkers in the whole wide universe.
Here are just some links (you can find more if you wish):
(1) Commission of Inquiry finds further evidence of war crimes in Ukraine (https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/10/1142617)
(2) https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/middle-east-and-north-africa/middle-east/syria/report-syria/
(3) https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/23/explainer-what-is-a-war-crime/
Almost ALL heads of state are WAR CRIMINALS - almost EVERY US President. It doesn't matter which side they're on (or which side you're on). There is a certain criteria and methodology for evaluating "what a war crime is" and who "a war criminal is".
And if you're wondering WHY I'm commenting about this, because that IS the discussion in this thread - the comments made by Jill Stein - which are HONEST - and I commend her for having the courage to speak the TRUTH. She (Jill Stein) knows that Biden, Harris, Trump, Zelensky, Netanyahu, etc. are ALSO war criminals (and more prominent ones IMO), but admitting that would be political suicide, career suicide, and quite possibly the end of the green party.
This is NOT about East Vs. West or North Vs. Global South, or "who I like" vs. "who you like". By now, you should realize that I am vehemently against the US Empire in EVERY WAY. That still doesn't change any facts about who is and is not a war criminal. Question everything, and then think critically about what you find.
Indu, I am going to deconstruct your comment, as all you've shown with it is an emotional reaction with no critical thinking or logic.
>>"Russia and Syria are not under threat from a Putin or Assad"
Who said that? Did I say Russia and Syria are under threat from Putin or Assad?
Read my comment again.
>>"To equate Putin and Assad as war criminals on a par with the obvious war criminals is being mischievous at best and irresponsible at worst."
WRONG! A war criminal IS a war criminal - regardless of whatever one's confirmation biases are. And in terms of "on par" -> who is comparing the level of war criminality here? Read my comment again.
>>"What do you recommend? For them to succumb to US/ NATO/ WEST and stop being " war criminals", according to your logical thinking?"
I'm not recommending anything. I am stating facts. You (or anyone else) can choose to ignore them if you/they wish. Who is suggesting anything about "stopping being war criminals"? Where did you get that idea from? You assume too much.
What does the FACT that Putin and Assad (and so many others including heads of State of multiple countries) ARE war criminals have to do with Caitlin's articles or existential threats? Are you uncomfortable with TRUTHS that go against your belief systems? That's a "YOU" problem, not a "reality of events" issue. Don't cover your head in the sand.
None of your statements have anything to do with my assertions (that have ample of evidence if you search the web without confirmation bias) about War Criminals. It seems this is an emotional rant against "your version of reality" being confronted with cognitive dissonance.
Do you know what a war crime is? (The official definition). If so, it is easy to ascertain who the war criminals would be in any scenario. Making a case in a court of law is a different issue.
>>"We are in a burning house and without escaping from it, we indulge in inane hypothesis."
There is no hypothesis here.
You need to do your own due diligence and research, and not "conform" because you "belong" to a community.
>>"Chang, I am dismayed , disappointed and spent."
Again, what relevance is there to that? I am not here to please you and stick to opinions that are acceptable to you. This is again a "YOU" problem.
You are blind in your faith if you believe that Assad and Putin are NOT War criminals. You think they are good guys? There are NO good guys in such positions of power. That is the reality.
Here is something you can do to correct your perceptions:
(1) Do a search on "Putin war criminal evidence" - and then follow the sources and evidence
(2) Do a search on "Assad war criminal evidence" - and similarly follow up on what you find
Don't be blind to the reality and propaganda (as many Americans are, as many Israelis are, as MOST humans are). Seek out evidence even if it goes against your beliefs - that is, of course, if you care about the TRUTH.
"What does the FACT that Putin and Assad (and so many others including heads of State of multiple countries) ARE war criminals " - an utter scumbag you are chokaski a disgusting piece of shit a fucking shill. offering links with "facts" from corrupt western controlled organizations. yeah right keep going chokaski.
Putin and Assad are war criminals based on what?
Both have been victims to a massive psyop propaganda campaign by the west.
Every WAR has war crimes. There has never been any war that does NOT have war crimes. Whether people have been prosecuted for them or not is a separate but related issue. Have you ever heard of a war/conflict without war crimes? War crimes are commited by both sides (or all parties). This is not a choice or a conscious decision. This is what happens in war. The definition of "WHAT constitutes a war crime" is too broad and general.
Here are just some links (you can find more if you wish):
(1) Commission of Inquiry finds further evidence of war crimes in Ukraine (https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/10/1142617)
(2) https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/middle-east-and-north-africa/middle-east/syria/report-syria/
(3) https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/23/explainer-what-is-a-war-crime/
Almost ALL heads of state are WAR CRIMINALS - almost EVERY US President. It doesn't matter which side they're on (or which side you're on). There is a certain criteria and methodology for evaluating "what a war crime is" and who "a war criminal is".
(1) Do a search on "Putin war criminal evidence" - and then follow the sources and evidence
(2) Do a search on "Assad war criminal evidence" - and similarly follow up on what you find
I am NOT implying that Assad or Putin should be charged for war crimes OR be served ICC arrest warrants. I am saying, by the broad and loose definition of "what a war crime constitutes" it is exceedingly easy for tens of thousands of people (heads of state and soldiers,military, etc.) to be labeled as "war criminals".
But the label of "war criminals" doesn't signify much, as EVERY US PRESIDENT (or almost EVERY) has been a WAR CRIMINAL. Again, I'm not making comparisons or measuring magnitudes here.
Firstly the links provided, including the UN and Amnesty are hardly credible, very biased on the MSM, US empire side of things. Ukraine has a propaganda dept on a par with the Nazi's in WWII. Mariupol atrocities, Bucha massacres, Donetsk bombings, kidnapping of children and many others all fabricated and manipulated by the same.
The question is what constitutes a war crime ? No doubt Russian military have committed some bad shit, but would say it pales in comparison to the Azov militias and Georgian led foreign mercenaries have carried out.
Basically the West, the CIA and MSM have co-ordinated in a very sophistcated propaganda operation against Russia in particular.
>>"Basically the West, the CIA and MSM have co-ordinated in a very sophistcated propaganda operation against Russia in particular."
I don't think anyone doubts that. That is a given.
>>"but would say it pales in comparison to the Azov militias and Georgian led foreign mercenaries have carried out."
I agree!
>>" Ukraine has a propaganda dept on a par with the Nazi's in WWII"
Again, I agree!
I am NOT COMPARING war crimes. I am saying EVERYONE commits them. Stemming from that logic, from a strictly logical perspective, THUS war crimes are commited by ALL parties involved (this should be pretty obvious by now).
>>"including the UN and Amnesty are hardly credible"
Who judges what is credible or not? You? Me? Russians? Ukrainians? Americans? Chinese? Saudi Arabian? Iranians? Israelites? You see where I'm going with this. Amnesty International (and Human Rights Watch) are some of the MORE credible sources. Do a search for war crimes by Putin and Assad for those sources (if that is your preference).
Link please?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1flndp1/jill_steins_fans_angrily_turn_on_her_after_she/
I saw tons of posts on X suddenly declaring that after supporting Stein for years they suddenly all turned on her. I believe most of those posts were trolls, sponsored either by the Democrats (most likely) or disaffected Republicans. The quickness with which lots of people followed suit was a true indication of nonserious voters who don't look deeply at facts and just bandwagon jump.
I don't see her lips move and until I do I will remain skeptical.
Biden: The global villain of wars on Sovereign lands.
Biden. The US villain who allowed Israel to commit genocide.............
Who would I vote for in the US?
Jill Stein.
You might as well just vote for Drumpf.
Go ahead be a moron.
Why do you even bother reading Caitlin?
🤡
It's no different from the ceasefire he doesn't want in the Ukraine.
Which in turn raises the question of why Biden doesn't want a ceasefire, especially as Russia has been, since Day One, ready to offer peace on lenient terms.
Biden wants a confrontation with Russia to at least weaken them
He told us why: "“For God’s sake, this man [Putin] cannot remain in power!”
They see every Russian death as worth the two million dollars they are paying for it. They hate all foreigners -- well, maybe cute little Ireland is OK -- so they also see every Ukrainian death as a plus. Who wants a ceasefire.
President Truman, one of the worst state terrorists in history when he MUDRERED around 200,000 almost totally innocent Japanese civilians when Japan refused to surrender their human rights under an UNCONDITIONAL surrender created by FDR
Japan was actually looking to surrender when Truman made that demand
I think the same thing can be said of just about any Western Government. This is tne one world government in action and I believe the main drivers are the oligarchs in the U.S.A. How few people notice that the U.N. is located in the U.S. It is part and parcel of the same power mongers. Only by dissolving the U.N.,, the WHO and the WEF and probably several other perverted organizations will people begin to be free again.
Peter,
I'm not quite sure dissolving these organizations is the only way out of the control the empire has on things, but getting the U.N. out of the U.S. is definitely a good start. Perhaps choosing one of the poorest countries on the planet might be something to consider, if only as a symbol that power doesn't always have to be embedded with MONEY .... .
I believe it is the only answer. These organizations have been coopted or have since their inception been a part of the problem. Think about the U.S. civil war that stole the rights of states to opt out of the Union. This is exactly what is happening with the attempts by the U.N. and WHO to gain more power. It is also why BRICS looks so appealing to so many countries that have been so exploited.
"Israel apologists have been amazingly defensive about its latest acts of terrorism in Lebanon." Yes. The top headline at this moment on The Gateway Pundit refers to the pager explosions as "Israel's Creative Attack on Hezbollah". Creative? I guess Hitler was pretty creative too, if we want to destroy another word in the English language. I feel literally sick over the brutality of the human race.
karl,
"I feel literally sick over the brutality of the human race."... You got my support on that issue,,,
Karl Pomeroy, I agree with you.
If they were letter bombs they would have been just as indiscriminate and still called “creative” and “targeted” by the same racist, vacuous morons. Ignore them.
Thank You Caitlin
The U.S. (not just Biden) has an extremely long history of not holding Israel accountable. Watch the 26 minute documentary in this article (scroll down) of Israel getting away with spying on the U.S.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/from-the-cold-war-to-9-11-a-look-at-israels-spy-regime-in-the-us/
Israel got away with attacking the USS Liberty and killing 34 sailors and wounding 174. Johnson should have been charged with treason.
I know that. Did you watch the link I sent.
Thanks ShastaBetty - both for the link and the accompanying video - quite interesting!
RAGE AGAINST THE WAR goals :
Not One More Penny for Wars in Ukraine or Gaza
Negotiate Peace
Stop the War Inflation
Disband NATO
Global Nuclear De-Escalation
Slash the Pentagon Budget
Abolish the CIA and Military-Industrial Deep State
Abolish War and Empire
Restore Civil Liberties
Pardon Julian Assange
"Hello Anti-War Supporters,
We're excited to host Rage Against the War Machine next Saturday, September 28th, at the Washington Monument "
Angela McArdle - LP CHair
<contact@rageagainstwar.com>
This post here if there will be any history left to us will be written on the walls. Every word, every line the horrible truth of our reality.
There will be History left just not Western History!
I didn't find much here I would disagree with. It's beyond time that people stop idolizing the Jews. Christians especially need to remember that twice in their ancient history God allowed their enemies to sack Jerusalem and cart the nobility off. Are we facing such another time now?
Let's not equate Zionists with The Jews
Unfortunately, the Jews (>80%) are equating their ethnicity with Zionism. I wish this wasn’t true. This in itself will trigger real antisemitism. I cry for them because they are so smart and so kind generally but so wrong on this issue! Victims of propaganda also
that is hardly 100% as your statement implies
And the figure may be from awhile ago too
AntiWar.com is one of my most favorite libertarian sites fully displaying their anti-interventionist views
God bless you Caitlin! Peace Peeps need to everything we can to defend you!
PERFECT POST