336 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
bill wolfe's avatar

Besides, I was commenting on a journalistic standard. When ones make an outlandish claim, one needs to meet a very high burden of proof: lots of good quality reliable supporting evidence from credible sources.

Expand full comment
jamenta's avatar

There is no such thing as "extraordinary evidence" in science. There is just the accumulation of evidence to help prove a hypothesis that eventually becomes a theory.

And even scientific theories can and have been disproven over time, despite the accumulation of evidence.

The interpretation and modeling of the evidence is just as important as the accumulation of the evidence.

That's where Skeptics usually fuck it up - they interpret evidence primarily with their philosophical lens of reductive Materialism - which has not been proven by science or philosophical reasoning, to date.

Patrick Powers is right, scientists can be just as unobjective and biased as any group of people. William James was keenly aware of this, as he established the very first school of psychology in the US at Harvard University.

William James - whom idiot Skeptics even during his day, would argue he didn't know what the fuck he was talking about.

Expand full comment