Agreed that this tunnel affair in NYC underneath the Chabad Lubavitch synagogue was probably intended for individual human abuse purposes but I'm deeply suspicious that the israelis have already planted nukes in major cities everywhere under the banner of "The Samson Option". This explains why the nations of the world toady up to the Zionist entity of israel at all times. Otherwise I feel israel would already have been vaporised by now.
Zionists control the US government. It matters little which maniac one votes in, the Zionists pull the majority of the strings. [As an aside, patriot Trump worries them more than the globalist Biden.] Both teams will dance to the Zionist tune. No change. All's well... ...until the people have had enough of this intolerable nonsense and maybe the existing order begins to fall apart under various armed uprisings that begin to inspire others until the Zionists fall and israel, the Zionist project, begins its feared worst case existential threat scenario even unto extinction, then the Samson Option is there to take everyone else with it only they do it first without ordinary interceptable ICBMs.
On reflection, they wouldn't need to dig tunnels since there's more destruction to be had at ground level or above if located in some tall building. Zionists ultimately won't give a pinch of dogshit about the USA if it has outlived its usefulness. Other countries would be severely cautioned by the knowledge that there might be foreign nuclear devices assembled in their own neck of the woods. "How?!", you might exclaim. The Diplomatic Bag can be quite a helpful thing...
Have I explained it any better? I'm not saying this is what is going on but I think it's plausible & it gives the Zionists a better but still slender chance of survival. They most certainly will have discussed such a scenario.
You're sounding unhinged DomeLord. Your comment is all about conjectures and projections, and presenting correlations as causations, and throwing in theories without any supporting evidence (at this point, I'm waiting for you to say something like absence of evidence is not evidence of absence...)
Plausible? What kind of an argument is that? Almost every scenario on the earth is plausible. (Note that scenarios with probabilities like 0.00000001 are also considered plausible). Maybe strive for explanations and justifications with more realistic probabilities?
Maybe try a more rigorous approach towards understanding how various spheres of influence interact to produce unintended outcomes?
Or you can take the easy route of your so-called "plausible" explanations as a means to satiate your confirmation bias and justify unsubstantiated narratives.
Here's another approach - try some hypothesis testing on your theories. Use data. Use statistics and probability to analyze that data. Talk to sources that can offer other perspectives for consideration - perspectives that are more rational perhaps?
Is that too much work? Maybe its easier to be intellectually lazy and stick with your existing theories to resolve whatever cognitive dissonances you have about the way the world works?
Just watched, Che.
Horrifying but not particularly surprising.
Agreed that this tunnel affair in NYC underneath the Chabad Lubavitch synagogue was probably intended for individual human abuse purposes but I'm deeply suspicious that the israelis have already planted nukes in major cities everywhere under the banner of "The Samson Option". This explains why the nations of the world toady up to the Zionist entity of israel at all times. Otherwise I feel israel would already have been vaporised by now.
For when WE regular non-Zionist people take over the controls of the previously existing horrendous ZOG.
Zionists control the US government. It matters little which maniac one votes in, the Zionists pull the majority of the strings. [As an aside, patriot Trump worries them more than the globalist Biden.] Both teams will dance to the Zionist tune. No change. All's well... ...until the people have had enough of this intolerable nonsense and maybe the existing order begins to fall apart under various armed uprisings that begin to inspire others until the Zionists fall and israel, the Zionist project, begins its feared worst case existential threat scenario even unto extinction, then the Samson Option is there to take everyone else with it only they do it first without ordinary interceptable ICBMs.
On reflection, they wouldn't need to dig tunnels since there's more destruction to be had at ground level or above if located in some tall building. Zionists ultimately won't give a pinch of dogshit about the USA if it has outlived its usefulness. Other countries would be severely cautioned by the knowledge that there might be foreign nuclear devices assembled in their own neck of the woods. "How?!", you might exclaim. The Diplomatic Bag can be quite a helpful thing...
Have I explained it any better? I'm not saying this is what is going on but I think it's plausible & it gives the Zionists a better but still slender chance of survival. They most certainly will have discussed such a scenario.
You're sounding unhinged DomeLord. Your comment is all about conjectures and projections, and presenting correlations as causations, and throwing in theories without any supporting evidence (at this point, I'm waiting for you to say something like absence of evidence is not evidence of absence...)
Plausible? What kind of an argument is that? Almost every scenario on the earth is plausible. (Note that scenarios with probabilities like 0.00000001 are also considered plausible). Maybe strive for explanations and justifications with more realistic probabilities?
Maybe try a more rigorous approach towards understanding how various spheres of influence interact to produce unintended outcomes?
Or you can take the easy route of your so-called "plausible" explanations as a means to satiate your confirmation bias and justify unsubstantiated narratives.
Here's another approach - try some hypothesis testing on your theories. Use data. Use statistics and probability to analyze that data. Talk to sources that can offer other perspectives for consideration - perspectives that are more rational perhaps?
Is that too much work? Maybe its easier to be intellectually lazy and stick with your existing theories to resolve whatever cognitive dissonances you have about the way the world works?