people committing genocide use the same language, yes, and then apologists for these various genocides justify it, the way you absolve genocide by western countries. the context is the Americans were committting genocide against the native inhabitants that interfered with colonisation, as the Israelis are committing genocide against the Palestinians, again because they are a hindrance to colonisation. for some reason you seem to support genocide unless committed by Israelis against Palestinians.
As you very well know, the argument is whether the American committed genocide, you lie about that repeatedly, lately by claiming it is "retrofitting values". it's all bullshit. I"m not going to waste any more time on you.
Zionism and Israel were founded on a policy of genocide.
The US was not. Neither were canada, australia or new zealand
That is not to say other nations founded through colonisation did not have instances of genocide but unlike Israel it was not policy or demanded.
And comparing the 20th and 21st centuries to the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th does not cut it. Shit why don’t we condemn the Italians for Carthage in 146BC IF WE ARE GOING TO DUMP THEM ALL IN THER SAME POT.
you made a simpleton point. next you will argue we can't judge the nazis because this is not 1945, or the Nakba because it so long ago in 1948. you seem to apologise for every genocide other than the ones carried out by Israel, which the US is backing, as it has in past genocides in Iraq (2003 was so long ago!) Vietnam, Guatemala, etc etc etc.
I said nothing of the kind. I said context is necessary. Yes we can judge previous acts and centuries with an understanding of the times and the environment. that applies ISRAEL also in terms of its ziojudeo culture.
WHAT YOU CANNOT DO IS A GENERAL COMPARISON BETWEEN CENTURIES WITHOUT CONTEXT.
culture and context provide perspective and understanding or why bother
you pretend that the US did not commit genocide in Iraq. that is this century. oh no it was 20 years ago! people in those benighted times had no idea! it was not official US policy! you are full of it.
I was never talking about Iraq. but i would say even that was not colonial extermination, but US violence to destroy Iraq because Israel wanted it. and it failed despite a million dead.
people committing genocide use the same language, yes, and then apologists for these various genocides justify it, the way you absolve genocide by western countries. the context is the Americans were committting genocide against the native inhabitants that interfered with colonisation, as the Israelis are committing genocide against the Palestinians, again because they are a hindrance to colonisation. for some reason you seem to support genocide unless committed by Israelis against Palestinians.
As you very well know, the argument is whether the American committed genocide, you lie about that repeatedly, lately by claiming it is "retrofitting values". it's all bullshit. I"m not going to waste any more time on you.
I Made a SIMPLE POINT.
Zionism and Israel were founded on a policy of genocide.
The US was not. Neither were canada, australia or new zealand
That is not to say other nations founded through colonisation did not have instances of genocide but unlike Israel it was not policy or demanded.
And comparing the 20th and 21st centuries to the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th does not cut it. Shit why don’t we condemn the Italians for Carthage in 146BC IF WE ARE GOING TO DUMP THEM ALL IN THER SAME POT.
you made a simpleton point. next you will argue we can't judge the nazis because this is not 1945, or the Nakba because it so long ago in 1948. you seem to apologise for every genocide other than the ones carried out by Israel, which the US is backing, as it has in past genocides in Iraq (2003 was so long ago!) Vietnam, Guatemala, etc etc etc.
I said nothing of the kind. I said context is necessary. Yes we can judge previous acts and centuries with an understanding of the times and the environment. that applies ISRAEL also in terms of its ziojudeo culture.
WHAT YOU CANNOT DO IS A GENERAL COMPARISON BETWEEN CENTURIES WITHOUT CONTEXT.
culture and context provide perspective and understanding or why bother
you pretend that the US did not commit genocide in Iraq. that is this century. oh no it was 20 years ago! people in those benighted times had no idea! it was not official US policy! you are full of it.
pretzelattack says it all - dried out bits of artificial junk food.
I was never talking about Iraq. but i would say even that was not colonial extermination, but US violence to destroy Iraq because Israel wanted it. and it failed despite a million dead.
no I do not. I was talking about trying to correlate actions centuries apart NOT 20 YEARS. YOU MISINTERPRET.