No doubt many feel that way, but not me. That's not even a good try. I'm not sure what persuasion you are if any, but you're a buffoon if you think Kadaffy Duck is someone or something to use as a retort to or resistance to empire or imperialism. How is blowing up nearly 300 noncombatants over Lockerbie "giving it to the man?"
There are three worlds.
1. The world we live in.
2. The world that could and should be.
3. The world we want to live in.
When discussing Kadaffy Duck and his demise, I prefer to analyze it according the the world in which we live. That's the context. In a world that could and should be, not only is what happened to Kadaffy anathema and nay impossible, but so too is the likes of Kadaffy anathema and nay impossible and that's the world I want to live in but unfortunately that isn't this world, is it?
No doubt many feel that way, but not me. That's not even a good try. I'm not sure what persuasion you are if any, but you're a buffoon if you think Kadaffy Duck is someone or something to use as a retort to or resistance to empire or imperialism. How is blowing up nearly 300 noncombatants over Lockerbie "giving it to the man?"
There are three worlds.
1. The world we live in.
2. The world that could and should be.
3. The world we want to live in.
When discussing Kadaffy Duck and his demise, I prefer to analyze it according the the world in which we live. That's the context. In a world that could and should be, not only is what happened to Kadaffy anathema and nay impossible, but so too is the likes of Kadaffy anathema and nay impossible and that's the world I want to live in but unfortunately that isn't this world, is it?