236 Comments
User's avatar
β­  Return to thread
π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π˜Ύπ™„π™π™„π™•π™€π™‰'s avatar

Yeah, the NIH tracks the private communications of CIA double propaganda agents. The district of corruption has been trying to get tucker off the air for years because you know, double propaganda agent for the deep state.

Expand full comment
Caitlin Johnstone's avatar

There has been no serious effort by anyone who matters to take Tucker Carlson off the air, any more than there was any serious effort by anyone who matters to get rid of Trump. The TV man is not your friend.

Expand full comment
Carol Diane Bevis's avatar

Have to reply that I like your comment. For some reason I am only allowed to like a few comments.

Expand full comment
π™‚π™Šπ™Šπ˜Ώ π˜Ύπ™„π™π™„π™•π™€π™‰'s avatar

The entire demonrat party and their communications division comprised of 98% corporate state media (CIA controlled) have been screaming bloody murder about tucker for years and they just rigged an election to get rid of trump and spent four years undermining his presidency with Russiagate lies. Must be all for show by nobody who matters lol. TV man friend is better suited for Twitter performances where you'll get the 'gotchya' cheers from followers.

Expand full comment
J M Hatch's avatar

You can count, can't you? Who owns Fox? Who owns Verizon? Who owns ClearChannel, and then there are the radio and newspaper conglomerates. You need to get help with that glue sniffing habit.

Expand full comment
The Inquisitive Inquisitor's avatar

Exactly. So once again I will reiterate, if Trump remains free, and it appears despite all the faux media rage he will remain free, and he wins in 2024, all this investment in NATO expansion will come to a halt and that investment may be lost or squandered. These are some of the most powerful people on earth. Will they just sit by and let Trump do it again? If Biden and Garland arrest Trump and his henchmen, at least they β€” Trump and his henchmen β€” will live. If Biden and Garland don't, the only fate I see for Trump at least, is death. Is Biden setting that up by holding Garland back?

Expand full comment
Phillip's avatar

NATO means shit. The taxpayers will pick up the tab. Washington is always about Washington. The question of who controls Panem/Mordor takes priority over all else.

Obama will get Michelle to run in 2024 on the grounds that only she can save 'our democracy'. Biden's administration is essentially a covert Obamanian project. Domestic policy is run by Susan Rice, who despises and mocks Biden. Foreign policy is a self-managing clown-show, but there is evidence that things are breaking down at the top (when Burns was in Moscow he spoke to Putin by phone using a landline within the Kremlin; presumably he could not trust the phones in the embassy itself which tells you that something is up). Obama can count on support from the oligarchy and Deep State, unless the threat of unrest from the Red States becomes unmanageable and it is expedient for them to compromise and stick a Republican in.

Trump is not taking too many plane trips lately, so I guess he realises that he is safest in Florida. I bet he gets Melania to taste his food before he digs in.

Expand full comment
The Inquisitive Inquisitor's avatar

Helicopter rides included. He knows all about that considering he had his casino managers who had all the goods on him murdered by helicopter crash.

Expand full comment
Phillip's avatar

The Deep State is vast and riddled with competing factions and mafias. One part of the US Deep State supports the agendas Carlson is pushing. Others do not.

Expand full comment
Le Chat Noir's avatar

Yes, I agree with this. After I finished reading the article I thought β€œshe’s somewhat right, but not quite right”. What you said makes it more correct in my mind. I would add multiple factions of Shadow government… I think most of the agendas probably come from rich, unelected oligarchs, and the people who carry them out are the Deep State

Expand full comment
Phillip's avatar

There are about 17 US intelligence agencies. Some are enormous. The senior executive ranks are divided into a complex web of mafias competing for influence. Some sponsor Left causes, others Right, not from conviction, but convenience. The motivations of the mafias are constant: agrandisement, in both power and resources. Some of these mafias are loyal to the system, others purely mercenary. The political agendas at the top are concealed from politicians and subordinates and they have zero loyalty towards those they use. As a rule, the mafias undermine one another all the time, but they will unite to protect the intel community and they mostly keep each others secrets.

The real oligarchs are the 1,000 plus billionaires. The people at the top of the Deep State are desperate to join this strata. The agendas (foreign and domestic) are all about making that happen.

Expand full comment
flipshod's avatar

This is an accurate description of the national security state.

In "Harlot's Ghost" Norman Mailer wrote the first half of what was supposed to be the "War and Peace" of the Cold War. Even if you already knew about the evil shenanigans of the CIA etc. Mailer brings to life the insanity required at the individual level to be a part of it all.

Expand full comment
JackSirius's avatar

Yes, there are definitely factions. How could there not be with $5 trillion sloshing around inside some of the worst accounting systems ever devised, with the most incurious workforce imaginable who choose to be oblivious to protect their sweet defined-benefit pensions, with information classified in perpetuity, with organizations siloed so the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing, with most of the real secrets placed in special access programs run by corporate β€œpartners”?

Add to that the secret competing agendas of your 1000 billionaires, the intra-imperial competitions between the five eyes intelligence agencies, the penetration of all US intelligence agencies by Israel (and others), and the absolute control of all politicos through blackmail programs (of which Jeffrey Epstein’s was just the tip of the iceberg). And add into that the power of the central banks, the World Bank, the IMF, the secret societies like the Bilderbergers, the WEF, all those webs of public-private NGOs that are de facto extensions of the deep state, and, yeah, factions.

But how is it that all those rabid cats get more or less herded together by a single dominant narrative? What or who manages that vast rabble into a kind of coherent totalitarian unified program of coordinated international actions? Is there an ultimate puppet master, or an eye in the Pyramid? If so, who (or what) the hell is it? Because if we really want to change things, we have to clearly identify the head of the snake. So, who is The Boss?

Expand full comment
Phillip's avatar

There is no boss of bosses, no capo di capi tutti. The Bond villains (Murdoch, Soros, Gates, Zuckerberg, Schwab, Musk) are flak catchers and fully expendable should the powers that be ever need any one of them gone. Coordination is instinctive and informal, like a flock of birds forming around whatever temporary leader sends the right signals. There is no narrative beyond power and money. The agenda re global integration is negotiable. So long as things between Washington and Moscow do not get out of hand (always a possibility) arrangements can be made.

Expand full comment