A question for you. Disregarding this shooting do you believe Mossad would carry out murder of people sympathetic to Israel to further Israel’s agenda?
>>"do you believe Mossad would carry out murder of people sympathetic to Israel to further Israel’s agenda?"
Of course - 100%. Israel (and Mossad) is capable of things a thousand times worse that the 'murder of people sympathetic to Israel to further its agenda' - as evidenced by the enfolding genocide. Israel is capable of unimaginable EVIL.
Here is a book that gives some examples of what Israel/Mossad/etc. are capable of ->"Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel's Targeted Assassinations" by Ronen Berman (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/33598223-rise-and-kill-first) -> details many assassinations that Israel has carried out for the U.S. Empire.
But 'being capable of something' is not a strong enough argument for people to assign the kind of probabilities they do to such events and jump to conclusions.
One difference between conspiracists and 'intellectually honest skeptics' is the quality of critical thinking skills and evidence-based reasoning - which is very difficult to find in the general public (America or otherwise).
A question for you. Disregarding this shooting do you believe Mossad would carry out murder of people sympathetic to Israel to further Israel’s agenda?
>>"do you believe Mossad would carry out murder of people sympathetic to Israel to further Israel’s agenda?"
Of course - 100%. Israel (and Mossad) is capable of things a thousand times worse that the 'murder of people sympathetic to Israel to further its agenda' - as evidenced by the enfolding genocide. Israel is capable of unimaginable EVIL.
Here is a book that gives some examples of what Israel/Mossad/etc. are capable of ->"Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel's Targeted Assassinations" by Ronen Berman (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/33598223-rise-and-kill-first) -> details many assassinations that Israel has carried out for the U.S. Empire.
But 'being capable of something' is not a strong enough argument for people to assign the kind of probabilities they do to such events and jump to conclusions.
One difference between conspiracists and 'intellectually honest skeptics' is the quality of critical thinking skills and evidence-based reasoning - which is very difficult to find in the general public (America or otherwise).
We completely agree. And thank you for the links.