Caitlin does have a point though. i.e. We have yet to have complete inarguable proof other intelligent life does exist. Even though the Nimitz incident of UAPs and other incidents do seem to point to possible other intelligent life. But if other Intelligent life does exist, it hasn't literally landed on our planet yet and announced itself to us. Instead we have objects being clearly reported as UAP incidents by credible sources, but if it is intelligent life (or intelligent AI, or robotic scouts) it appears to want to avoid us for now.
There are also some other arguments against the possibility of other Life out there. The question of how life begins is still a huge enigma in science. For one, even though evolutionary science does help explain how life evolves (to some extent) - current evolutionary science does not provide a working, proven theory on how life began. The so-called "primordial soup" theory has gotten nowhere in the scientific lab, and the more scientific knowledge we have accumulated regarding the absurdly complex anatomy of cell structures, DNA, and the question of the required early replication in the exact order required for life itself remains an unresolved one, and ridiculously unlikely *even if* one considers the entire universe as a possible primordial soup of chance interactions.
Caitlin does have a point though. i.e. We have yet to have complete inarguable proof other intelligent life does exist. Even though the Nimitz incident of UAPs and other incidents do seem to point to possible other intelligent life. But if other Intelligent life does exist, it hasn't literally landed on our planet yet and announced itself to us. Instead we have objects being clearly reported as UAP incidents by credible sources, but if it is intelligent life (or intelligent AI, or robotic scouts) it appears to want to avoid us for now.
There are also some other arguments against the possibility of other Life out there. The question of how life begins is still a huge enigma in science. For one, even though evolutionary science does help explain how life evolves (to some extent) - current evolutionary science does not provide a working, proven theory on how life began. The so-called "primordial soup" theory has gotten nowhere in the scientific lab, and the more scientific knowledge we have accumulated regarding the absurdly complex anatomy of cell structures, DNA, and the question of the required early replication in the exact order required for life itself remains an unresolved one, and ridiculously unlikely *even if* one considers the entire universe as a possible primordial soup of chance interactions.