You ask: "What CONCEPTS of conspiracy theorists were INTRODUCED re 911 ?"
My answer is the concept that the laws of physics don't apply to the collapse of building 7 as published in the NIST report. Such laws don't need to be "portrayed" they simply exist and can be seen on the films of the collapse of building 7.
If you think "GRAVITY" is a "dubious idea" then good day to you.
So, you cant answer any of the questions raised, and instead retreat into repetition-
no one considers the 911 event as you do, the whole event difies reason, logic & possibility- PLANES dont function as portrayed for a start.
The REASON for 911 was as a catalyst for 'the US empire to use the radicalism caused by its military violence in the middle east to justify more military expansionism in the region, leading to more military violence.'
You seem to be in disagreement with the article itself here.
Dub SurgeOn please calm down mate! To suggest that "no one considers the 911 event as you do" is patent misreading of what I have written and all the links to I give in particular Architects for 9/11 truth.
The point I am making is that the ONLY observation needed is that building 7 collapsed at free fall speed ergo the NIST report account is all lies. Who did it, why, and how are irrelevant, to come to the conclusion that the US government are lying about it.
You ask: "What CONCEPTS of conspiracy theorists were INTRODUCED re 911 ?"
My answer is the concept that the laws of physics don't apply to the collapse of building 7 as published in the NIST report. Such laws don't need to be "portrayed" they simply exist and can be seen on the films of the collapse of building 7.
If you think "GRAVITY" is a "dubious idea" then good day to you.
So, you cant answer any of the questions raised, and instead retreat into repetition-
no one considers the 911 event as you do, the whole event difies reason, logic & possibility- PLANES dont function as portrayed for a start.
The REASON for 911 was as a catalyst for 'the US empire to use the radicalism caused by its military violence in the middle east to justify more military expansionism in the region, leading to more military violence.'
You seem to be in disagreement with the article itself here.
😂
Dub SurgeOn please calm down mate! To suggest that "no one considers the 911 event as you do" is patent misreading of what I have written and all the links to I give in particular Architects for 9/11 truth.
https://www0.ae911truth.org/
The point I am making is that the ONLY observation needed is that building 7 collapsed at free fall speed ergo the NIST report account is all lies. Who did it, why, and how are irrelevant, to come to the conclusion that the US government are lying about it.
🙄🥱😴😴😴😴😴😴