Ad hominem attacks don't do you credit. What is a "science denier"? The supporters of bleeding patients with leeches probably called their critics "science deniers". Science is not a consensus bandwagon; it's often the people who deny the existing science who make the vital breakthroughs that move things forward.
climatology is telling you to stop using leeches. Using leeches is not good for you in general. It doesn't cure the underlying conditions, althought unlike fossil fuel it doesn't actively cause the condition has nothing to do with a popularity/social influence contest on Tik Tok or whatever.
Ad hominem attacks don't do you credit. What is a "science denier"? The supporters of bleeding patients with leeches probably called their critics "science deniers". Science is not a consensus bandwagon; it's often the people who deny the existing science who make the vital breakthroughs that move things forward.
climatology is telling you to stop using leeches. Using leeches is not good for you in general. It doesn't cure the underlying conditions, althought unlike fossil fuel it doesn't actively cause the condition has nothing to do with a popularity/social influence contest on Tik Tok or whatever.
I stopped using leeches in about 1897.