that seems to be the whole point of competing, not? in the end someone wins, eliminating competition seems inherent to competing, especially when you put basic needs (food, shelter, health,...) on the playing field. for the rich it is a game, for the poor it's a matter of life and death.
Seems like your definition of competition is totally circular logic. “Competition = No Competition”. Or in other words, you define competition as “the creation of monopolies.”
indeed, competition is a cul-de-sac with monopoly as the ultimate goal of the mechanism. other people studied this and came to the same conclusion. convincing people it's something different has become an important part in outsmarting competition.
>>"Monopolies cannot survive in a truly capitalistic economy."
INCORRECT.
Monopolies is an intrinsic feature of CAPITALISM. Capitalism (and all that it entails) leads to monopolies.
There is nothing like "truly capitalistic economy" - who's definition is adhered to for "truly" and "untruly" Capitalism? Yours? Other Capitalism apologists? Imperialists or Colonialists? Neoliberals? The Oligarchy and the power elite?
that seems to be the whole point of competing, not? in the end someone wins, eliminating competition seems inherent to competing, especially when you put basic needs (food, shelter, health,...) on the playing field. for the rich it is a game, for the poor it's a matter of life and death.
Seems like your definition of competition is totally circular logic. “Competition = No Competition”. Or in other words, you define competition as “the creation of monopolies.”
indeed, competition is a cul-de-sac with monopoly as the ultimate goal of the mechanism. other people studied this and came to the same conclusion. convincing people it's something different has become an important part in outsmarting competition.
Monopolies cannot survive in a truly capitalistic economy.
>>"Monopolies cannot survive in a truly capitalistic economy."
INCORRECT.
Monopolies is an intrinsic feature of CAPITALISM. Capitalism (and all that it entails) leads to monopolies.
There is nothing like "truly capitalistic economy" - who's definition is adhered to for "truly" and "untruly" Capitalism? Yours? Other Capitalism apologists? Imperialists or Colonialists? Neoliberals? The Oligarchy and the power elite?
In other words, your definition of monopoly is schizophrenic.
You're not making sense here...
You aren't making it anywhere.
Otherwise known as Capitalism.