Yes I did see that in the house, thankfully it is just a resolution for now. Although I am sure it will be applied to the pending Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act.. or something like it.
As far as commenting on forums and addressing accusers..
Some things are subjective, like if a person supports zionism or not. Other things are objective, like saying anti-zionism is not antisemitic. Unfortunately, most people just parrot whatever the TV tells them, so naturally they do not have a defense to your objection.. because they have not been provided one by their TV.
If they do manage to speak up and defend their accusation, it usually arrives in the form of a word salad that attempts to weaponize empathy and talks about things wholly unrelated to the context in which they accused you. This rhetoric is easy to defeat by someone who isn't under the spell of the narrative.. which is one reason we will not see it openly debated outside of a few platforms such as this.
Oh I agree with what you are saying. I was just referring to the choice or not, that much is subjective. If a person chooses to support or not. It IS objectively a racist political ideology , I do agree with that for sure, hard to dispute considering Herzel's own writings and much of what has followed.
Yes I did see that in the house, thankfully it is just a resolution for now. Although I am sure it will be applied to the pending Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act.. or something like it.
As far as commenting on forums and addressing accusers..
Some things are subjective, like if a person supports zionism or not. Other things are objective, like saying anti-zionism is not antisemitic. Unfortunately, most people just parrot whatever the TV tells them, so naturally they do not have a defense to your objection.. because they have not been provided one by their TV.
If they do manage to speak up and defend their accusation, it usually arrives in the form of a word salad that attempts to weaponize empathy and talks about things wholly unrelated to the context in which they accused you. This rhetoric is easy to defeat by someone who isn't under the spell of the narrative.. which is one reason we will not see it openly debated outside of a few platforms such as this.
Oh I agree with what you are saying. I was just referring to the choice or not, that much is subjective. If a person chooses to support or not. It IS objectively a racist political ideology , I do agree with that for sure, hard to dispute considering Herzel's own writings and much of what has followed.