I do not necessarily think in terms of any theory. Just observing the fact that any human occupation calls for certain traits. A timid non-combative person is not suited for a political position. The feisty one is, but necessarily carries negative baggage.
It would be ideal to expect a person to be one thing at a job and completely another when at home. All the negative properties will bleed through. So it's those proverbial "checks and balances" that need to be retrievable and enforceable. As well as population willing to go through all those auditing processes. Which is not something many people would enjoy doing.
The trick is to choose the theory or rubric which accurately describes observable reality, rather than to choose the reality that best corresponds to the chosen theory.
I do not necessarily think in terms of any theory. Just observing the fact that any human occupation calls for certain traits. A timid non-combative person is not suited for a political position. The feisty one is, but necessarily carries negative baggage.
It would be ideal to expect a person to be one thing at a job and completely another when at home. All the negative properties will bleed through. So it's those proverbial "checks and balances" that need to be retrievable and enforceable. As well as population willing to go through all those auditing processes. Which is not something many people would enjoy doing.
The trick is to choose the theory or rubric which accurately describes observable reality, rather than to choose the reality that best corresponds to the chosen theory.