Your comments, both Doris and Carol making a clear distinction between the natures of men and women is absolutely correct but sadly, in 2023, it has lost some of its impact based on some of the women running the US today. One doesn't have to identify them and there are so many, as many of them line up behind the likes of the evil Hilary Clinton. Who knows why? Yes, we did see an example earlier this week from Pelosi and her praise for Bush, the man who lied to the world and who was directly responsible for half a million children dying in Iraq.
An error in judgement?
I am not able to ever forgive anyone for such a crime but obviously a women was able to do that in a very public way. Yes, a woman. One has to admit that there are so many like her, as they continue to increasingly populate the houses of government in America. They obviously find it easier to join the men rather than to take a stance for truth and humanity.
In other countries, the rise of women in politics and other places of importance is noticeably on the increase and as a male, familiar more so with a male dominated world for most of my life, I, for one, couldn't be more pleased.
But the danger is, in my reckoning, that the climate today is such that the really outspoken women are cautious, are few in number, and seem to take refuge in eventually "going along with the majority" ( i.e. the males), as we see every day in Washington. If they continue to fly a flag for peace, they don't last long and there are so many examples of that. Bucking the system tales courage in today's climate.
But Pelosi? How can she justify that comment? What must children think who are of an age to understand her words and know the disgraceful history of the war in Iraq, built on a lie by the man she so soundly praised from the rooftops.
Your comments, both Doris and Carol making a clear distinction between the natures of men and women is absolutely correct but sadly, in 2023, it has lost some of its impact based on some of the women running the US today. One doesn't have to identify them and there are so many, as many of them line up behind the likes of the evil Hilary Clinton. Who knows why? Yes, we did see an example earlier this week from Pelosi and her praise for Bush, the man who lied to the world and who was directly responsible for half a million children dying in Iraq.
An error in judgement?
I am not able to ever forgive anyone for such a crime but obviously a women was able to do that in a very public way. Yes, a woman. One has to admit that there are so many like her, as they continue to increasingly populate the houses of government in America. They obviously find it easier to join the men rather than to take a stance for truth and humanity.
In other countries, the rise of women in politics and other places of importance is noticeably on the increase and as a male, familiar more so with a male dominated world for most of my life, I, for one, couldn't be more pleased.
But the danger is, in my reckoning, that the climate today is such that the really outspoken women are cautious, are few in number, and seem to take refuge in eventually "going along with the majority" ( i.e. the males), as we see every day in Washington. If they continue to fly a flag for peace, they don't last long and there are so many examples of that. Bucking the system tales courage in today's climate.
But Pelosi? How can she justify that comment? What must children think who are of an age to understand her words and know the disgraceful history of the war in Iraq, built on a lie by the man she so soundly praised from the rooftops.