In theory the cardinal principles of the Left are supposed to be peace, freedom, equality, and autonomy (as opposed to the cardinal principles of the Right, to wit, authority, order, security, social status, private wealth, the military virtues, etc.) It's very odd to repeatedly see one taken for the other, and I am curious as to how that happens.
Ask yourself, which characterizes which more closely...?
The Left is OBSESSED with so-called "wit", security (censorship), authority (moral), SOCIAL STATUS (the psychologists have figured this out and profiled their personalities...it's not good), wealth (party of dark money, insider trading), military values (war in Ukraine).
I gave a description of the classical Left. Most contemporary usage of the term is incoherent. Incoherent language can't be used in rational discussions, although they may be fun for Surrealists and Dadaists.
In theory the cardinal principles of the Left are supposed to be peace, freedom, equality, and autonomy (as opposed to the cardinal principles of the Right, to wit, authority, order, security, social status, private wealth, the military virtues, etc.) It's very odd to repeatedly see one taken for the other, and I am curious as to how that happens.
Ask yourself, which characterizes which more closely...?
The Left is OBSESSED with so-called "wit", security (censorship), authority (moral), SOCIAL STATUS (the psychologists have figured this out and profiled their personalities...it's not good), wealth (party of dark money, insider trading), military values (war in Ukraine).
I gave a description of the classical Left. Most contemporary usage of the term is incoherent. Incoherent language can't be used in rational discussions, although they may be fun for Surrealists and Dadaists.
And Newspeakers.