So who fell into whom's trap? I would imagine that there have been 'warning signs' of anti-israeli attacks for, well as long as there's been an israel. But, even if true, why would hamas comply?
Do you have any intel on hamas's motivation for the attack and its expected response? I suppose it's easier to plan the attack from a high rise in Qatar than in gaza...poke poke.
So who fell into whom's trap? I would imagine that there have been 'warning signs' of anti-israeli attacks for, well as long as there's been an israel. But, even if true, why would hamas comply?
Do you have any intel on hamas's motivation for the attack and its expected response? I suppose it's easier to plan the attack from a high rise in Qatar than in gaza...poke poke.
Well, we also now know that at least 2 or 3 of the "hijackers" on 9/11 were recruited by the CIA months before the "attack."
Note the quotes I use above.
And yes, it seems more of a cooperative effort than anyone 'trapped" anyone.
And it also depends on what page you open the book to when you begin an analysis.
I agree the 9/11 crap stinks.