Absolutely! I watched Tucker's opening monologue, and he was spot on with his condemnation of Nancy's "Excellent Adventure." All the rest of the media whores are in lockstep that Nancy mustn't back down after she said she was going there. And I don't believe for a second that Pelosi is going to Taiwan over the objections of the Biden regime. Biden is engaged in the old practice called "plausible deniability."
Well then tell us why Tucker is only NOW reading the room? If you Google "Tucker Carlson" and "China Threat" there are many links that provide evidence that he claimed China as a threat. Tucker just reads the room NOW and you think he's a hero? Nah.
I dunno, is it possible to multitask here? I think China is a HUGE threat, which is precisely why I think it was beyond stupid for Nancy to poke at them right now.
You honestly think China wants to play second fiddle to the USA forever? They are already working on displacing the dollar as the reserve currency with Russia. China wants to own us. And by own, I don't mean just having the US as a pool of consumers, but literally owning us and taking over the country in the long run.
That doesn't mean I think we should instigate a hot war with China, but we should be preparing to make ourselves independent from them financially and economically, especially in manufacturing. China could bring the USA to its knees quickly without firing a shot.
if i noticed a parasite sucking my blood, i would do everything to poop it out and flush the toilet. iwhy the hecll would i want to "own" it????? the way the parasites "think".....
Umm...because our land is rich in natural resources and controlling us would mean China controls the planet? I'm not sure why this is hard to understand. Why is the US trying to control the planet?
read first, i said "indirectly" why ignore that part and make an assinine request with such fake --read liberal -- "politeness"? just a rhetorical question.
Carlson did not state at any time he was WRONG! It's totally disingenuous for him to now claim he wasn't a part of stoking the China fear. And for you to claim he "indirectly" did is also WRONG! There, is that more direct?
Absolutely! I watched Tucker's opening monologue, and he was spot on with his condemnation of Nancy's "Excellent Adventure." All the rest of the media whores are in lockstep that Nancy mustn't back down after she said she was going there. And I don't believe for a second that Pelosi is going to Taiwan over the objections of the Biden regime. Biden is engaged in the old practice called "plausible deniability."
Well then tell us why Tucker is only NOW reading the room? If you Google "Tucker Carlson" and "China Threat" there are many links that provide evidence that he claimed China as a threat. Tucker just reads the room NOW and you think he's a hero? Nah.
I dunno, is it possible to multitask here? I think China is a HUGE threat, which is precisely why I think it was beyond stupid for Nancy to poke at them right now.
threat to what / whom??? how??? who are you speaking for???
You honestly think China wants to play second fiddle to the USA forever? They are already working on displacing the dollar as the reserve currency with Russia. China wants to own us. And by own, I don't mean just having the US as a pool of consumers, but literally owning us and taking over the country in the long run.
That doesn't mean I think we should instigate a hot war with China, but we should be preparing to make ourselves independent from them financially and economically, especially in manufacturing. China could bring the USA to its knees quickly without firing a shot.
if i noticed a parasite sucking my blood, i would do everything to poop it out and flush the toilet. iwhy the hecll would i want to "own" it????? the way the parasites "think".....
Umm...because our land is rich in natural resources and controlling us would mean China controls the planet? I'm not sure why this is hard to understand. Why is the US trying to control the planet?
better late than never. the guy at least admitted his error, in an indirect way.
Please provide the link to show me that Carlson admitted to his China fear mongering and stating that he was wrong.
read first, i said "indirectly" why ignore that part and make an assinine request with such fake --read liberal -- "politeness"? just a rhetorical question.
Carlson did not state at any time he was WRONG! It's totally disingenuous for him to now claim he wasn't a part of stoking the China fear. And for you to claim he "indirectly" did is also WRONG! There, is that more direct?
he's not perfect, so sue him, LOL the length the neoliberals would go to cover and justify their own culpability...