I've mentioned this before, so if you've read this, please skip it.
As much as I don't want WWIII, there is a separate problem that also needs to be discussed: The U.S. can't beat anyone in a war. That's a second reason not to have one, the first being: it is immoral.
But let me outline how weak the U.S. is:
We have some good soldiers, but I think they are about 50 and retired. A lot of good ones of today lost their jobs because they thought too independently, and were too tough--they wouldn't take the covid shot and got kicked out. Q. Why should anyone young and healthy not let their body create natural immunity?
I just don't think today's weak, obedient soldiers can do much. We lost in Afghanistan, Iraq, and numerous other places. We think words--propaganda--matter more than deeds.
But the ultimate "propaganda" is what is called "propaganda of the deed," and our deeds are: we start wars, and then lose them.
Our national debt also went from $1 trillion to $31.6 trillion in under 40 years. We're weak, dumb, compliant, fat, and beyond broke--we're bankrupt. You can't just print money without actually creating new goods and services. Our economy, like our weak military, is fake.
Morally, I oppose war.
But I also oppose it on practical grounds.
When you're fat, weak, lose conflicts, propagandized, and have no practical skills, but just have ideology, you should strive to lose weight, become strong, stop starting conflicts, aim for truth, and develop real skills that people actually need, just like a person with a worthless four-year degree in some pointless major who decides to become an electrician instead.
That's what the U.S. needs to do. It needs to clean up its own room before it criticizes the world.
What if the u.s. brought, clean water, food, housing and access to education rather than bombs, wouldn't the u.s. win all wars? Take Cuba for instance, just stop helping.
We've wasted $100 billion on Ukraine. For those in favor of this, are you aware how much of that money and the weapons never even made it to Ukraine? Apparently, a bunch of the weapons went to Africa.
Maybe we could have fixed our own impoverished cities, which are run by Democrats. They've been violent and poor for 50 years. I buy into the theory that the Democrats suck, and about 90% of the Republicans suck, and they want you poor, fat, sick, depressed, isolated, and distracted, so they can extract as much money as they can from you, and then have you die early. Because we could have fixed a lot of problems in America by now if we wanted to.
I've mentioned this before, so if you've read this, please skip it.
As much as I don't want WWIII, there is a separate problem that also needs to be discussed: The U.S. can't beat anyone in a war. That's a second reason not to have one, the first being: it is immoral.
But let me outline how weak the U.S. is:
We have some good soldiers, but I think they are about 50 and retired. A lot of good ones of today lost their jobs because they thought too independently, and were too tough--they wouldn't take the covid shot and got kicked out. Q. Why should anyone young and healthy not let their body create natural immunity?
I just don't think today's weak, obedient soldiers can do much. We lost in Afghanistan, Iraq, and numerous other places. We think words--propaganda--matter more than deeds.
But the ultimate "propaganda" is what is called "propaganda of the deed," and our deeds are: we start wars, and then lose them.
Our national debt also went from $1 trillion to $31.6 trillion in under 40 years. We're weak, dumb, compliant, fat, and beyond broke--we're bankrupt. You can't just print money without actually creating new goods and services. Our economy, like our weak military, is fake.
Morally, I oppose war.
But I also oppose it on practical grounds.
When you're fat, weak, lose conflicts, propagandized, and have no practical skills, but just have ideology, you should strive to lose weight, become strong, stop starting conflicts, aim for truth, and develop real skills that people actually need, just like a person with a worthless four-year degree in some pointless major who decides to become an electrician instead.
That's what the U.S. needs to do. It needs to clean up its own room before it criticizes the world.
What if the u.s. brought, clean water, food, housing and access to education rather than bombs, wouldn't the u.s. win all wars? Take Cuba for instance, just stop helping.
We've wasted $100 billion on Ukraine. For those in favor of this, are you aware how much of that money and the weapons never even made it to Ukraine? Apparently, a bunch of the weapons went to Africa.
Maybe we could have fixed our own impoverished cities, which are run by Democrats. They've been violent and poor for 50 years. I buy into the theory that the Democrats suck, and about 90% of the Republicans suck, and they want you poor, fat, sick, depressed, isolated, and distracted, so they can extract as much money as they can from you, and then have you die early. Because we could have fixed a lot of problems in America by now if we wanted to.
I love the old one they always went with "there's no money for that"! Now they continually blame the other party. All bullshit of course.