I have said what I needed to say to you (and what people need to know about you and your behavior). EVERYONE here (and elsewhere) observes your words and behavior. Some are deceived by your methods. Others are smarter to pick up on your strategies and lack of logic and strawman arguments and deflections and introduction of extraneous information and tangents and distractions and fallacious comparisons and more.
I will go back to being depressed and angry about the plight of the Palestinians and the world - but you do YOU - whatever rocks your boat - whatever helps you create 'more hate' in the world - whatever helps you 'divide people' further.
Odd is it not that you are the only one saying it and people are not lining up behind you validating your insults and abuse. You might want to ponder that.
I shall ignore your silly insult posts in future. Happy to discuss like adults any reasonable points you make, should they appear.
You might want to ponder why you are more transparent than you think in your motives. Why would I care about who lines up behind me? I'm a non-conformist thinker. I do my own thinking. I will let others do their own thinking.
I will continue to point out your strategies of hate and dividing people and deceiving people and making people aware of people like you just as I would do the same in the case of making people aware of Zionism and their narratives and propaganda and strategies - you are free to ignore me or do whatever you want.
I told you that this would ALWAYS be my response to you ->
"FUCK OFF - and KEEP FUCKING OFF Jenny Shit-For-Brains Stokes! This will be my standard reply to you (for all the abusive brain-farts that you leave on my comments)."
Why? You have abused be verbally too many times for no reason (even though I have been on your side (though you often don't seem to comprehend my comments and don't realise it). Since you've told me to FUCK OFF even when I said that I liked you and you had a good heart", this is the response you will receive from me.
Do you think people are like Dogs that you can simply verbally abuse (for no good reason) and they will come back for more? (since you do this often with me). Do you think you can willy-nilly throw your emotional temper tantrums on people as if they are your immediate family that might not have a choice in taking your shit? Do you think you are special because you think you are the only one that has problems? I have news for you - there are many others with problems worse than yours.
Again, the above will be my response to you - as you've abused be verbally once too often - and then you demand special pleading and attention because you think you have the greatest problems on the planet that you keep talking about on Caitlin's substack, while there are others too with more serious problems than yours that are private people that do not wish to discuss it with others.
So if you can verbally abuse a person (for no good reason other than not comprehending their comments), that has been on your side in the past, then what kind of a person does that make you? Do you want PROOF of our exchanges where that has happened? (I have the emails of our substack conversations). And then you run away like a coward when that person responds to you without giving them the respect of a response for falsely accusing them of something they never said. That is called HIT-and-RUN - and you do that all to often with me AND others in this Substack and others.
Gypsy, you are not a part of this conversation. You haven't spent the time looking over Jenny Stoke's comments to me or her lack of reading comprehension skills and COMPLETE and often unhinged responses to my comments (often even when it is positive/good about her - which is what is even more bizarre). This is between me and her. So, on this topic - STFU - as you don't have enough information to be objective about it - but sure - go ahead with your emotional reactions if you need to.
BTW, I'm not here for your respect. I'm here to read Caitlin's articles and discuss and commiserate with others Caitlin and Tim's work. It is irrelevant whether you respect me or not - especially since that respect seems to come from a basis of emotions (and agreement) rather than a basic of logic, clear thinking, and objective attention to facts.
So, unless you think you are THAT IMPORTANT that people should strive for YOUR RESPECT, you're barking up the wrong tree here.
Yes, she brings her opinions up a lot and it never shows much logic. It's my opinion that ignoring her is best or a whole day could be wasted on the back and forth.
As I have said to CC, please take one statement I have made and prove it to be illogical and lacking in a factual base, therefore only opinion. One will do. Chang has not been able to do it but perhaps you can. I have no problem when people can make a case to prove me wrong. Over to you.
I have said what I needed to say to you (and what people need to know about you and your behavior). EVERYONE here (and elsewhere) observes your words and behavior. Some are deceived by your methods. Others are smarter to pick up on your strategies and lack of logic and strawman arguments and deflections and introduction of extraneous information and tangents and distractions and fallacious comparisons and more.
I will go back to being depressed and angry about the plight of the Palestinians and the world - but you do YOU - whatever rocks your boat - whatever helps you create 'more hate' in the world - whatever helps you 'divide people' further.
Odd is it not that you are the only one saying it and people are not lining up behind you validating your insults and abuse. You might want to ponder that.
I shall ignore your silly insult posts in future. Happy to discuss like adults any reasonable points you make, should they appear.
>>"You might want to ponder that."
You might want to ponder why you are more transparent than you think in your motives. Why would I care about who lines up behind me? I'm a non-conformist thinker. I do my own thinking. I will let others do their own thinking.
I will continue to point out your strategies of hate and dividing people and deceiving people and making people aware of people like you just as I would do the same in the case of making people aware of Zionism and their narratives and propaganda and strategies - you are free to ignore me or do whatever you want.
You do NOT allow others to do their own thinking.
I told you that this would ALWAYS be my response to you ->
"FUCK OFF - and KEEP FUCKING OFF Jenny Shit-For-Brains Stokes! This will be my standard reply to you (for all the abusive brain-farts that you leave on my comments)."
Why? You have abused be verbally too many times for no reason (even though I have been on your side (though you often don't seem to comprehend my comments and don't realise it). Since you've told me to FUCK OFF even when I said that I liked you and you had a good heart", this is the response you will receive from me.
Do you think people are like Dogs that you can simply verbally abuse (for no good reason) and they will come back for more? (since you do this often with me). Do you think you can willy-nilly throw your emotional temper tantrums on people as if they are your immediate family that might not have a choice in taking your shit? Do you think you are special because you think you are the only one that has problems? I have news for you - there are many others with problems worse than yours.
Again, the above will be my response to you - as you've abused be verbally once too often - and then you demand special pleading and attention because you think you have the greatest problems on the planet that you keep talking about on Caitlin's substack, while there are others too with more serious problems than yours that are private people that do not wish to discuss it with others.
So if you can verbally abuse a person (for no good reason other than not comprehending their comments), that has been on your side in the past, then what kind of a person does that make you? Do you want PROOF of our exchanges where that has happened? (I have the emails of our substack conversations). And then you run away like a coward when that person responds to you without giving them the respect of a response for falsely accusing them of something they never said. That is called HIT-and-RUN - and you do that all to often with me AND others in this Substack and others.
So yeah, may you reap what you sow.
Just STFU Chang.
And to think, I USED to respect your opinions.
You take on mah Sistah Jenny, you’re takin’ on me too.
Gypsy, you are not a part of this conversation. You haven't spent the time looking over Jenny Stoke's comments to me or her lack of reading comprehension skills and COMPLETE and often unhinged responses to my comments (often even when it is positive/good about her - which is what is even more bizarre). This is between me and her. So, on this topic - STFU - as you don't have enough information to be objective about it - but sure - go ahead with your emotional reactions if you need to.
BTW, I'm not here for your respect. I'm here to read Caitlin's articles and discuss and commiserate with others Caitlin and Tim's work. It is irrelevant whether you respect me or not - especially since that respect seems to come from a basis of emotions (and agreement) rather than a basic of logic, clear thinking, and objective attention to facts.
So, unless you think you are THAT IMPORTANT that people should strive for YOUR RESPECT, you're barking up the wrong tree here.
Yes, she brings her opinions up a lot and it never shows much logic. It's my opinion that ignoring her is best or a whole day could be wasted on the back and forth.
As I have said to CC, please take one statement I have made and prove it to be illogical and lacking in a factual base, therefore only opinion. One will do. Chang has not been able to do it but perhaps you can. I have no problem when people can make a case to prove me wrong. Over to you.
Thanks Davina. Very kind of you.