You posited a theory of human behavior that was genetic in origin and driven by a competitive model of natural selection. That's a totally discredited project known as "Social Darwinism".
Huh? Your reading comprehension is dodgy at best. You're conflating several things and are so far off what I said, I hope you don’t mind my leaving it at that.
You posited a theory of human behavior that was genetic in origin and driven by a competitive model of natural selection. That's a totally discredited project known as "Social Darwinism".
Own it.
Huh? Your reading comprehension is dodgy at best. You're conflating several things and are so far off what I said, I hope you don’t mind my leaving it at that.
Two people read what you wrote and came to a different conclusion than the one you believed was clear. Maybe the issue is your post and not them.
Thanks for the input. I’ve gone back and looked and find what I said ( to me) irreducible. I thought the subsequent thread clarified.