If there was ever an election in which voting for a third-party candidate was the best possible choice, this is it. Only if you are chain smoking fatal doses of hopium can you believe that either Harris or Trump will actually do anything like the right or wise thing on either of the burning life and death issues facing the country over which presidents exercise direct and decisive power - Ukraine and Israel. They may have differences over abortion, immigration, trans rights, supreme court nominations and the like, but they don't have decisive power over these matters as they do in matters of war and peace. Those other issues, important as they may be, will be decided through a political process in which the president's preferences are thwarted more often than not.
All this is to say that the two-party duopoly under which we live has conspired to deny voters any meaningful say on the starkest moral and most dangerous political choices facing our nation. For that reason, the only sane and moral thing to do to express our frustration, disgust and contempt is to opt out and vote for a candidate who we believe is right on the most important and decisive issues, even if that candidate has no chance of winning under this corrupted electoral system.
A vote like this means we know our vote has already been "thrown away," not by us but by the two parties that have conspired to steal our electoral system for their own corrupt purposes. By voting against the duopoly, we declare that we care enough about our country to take our democratic act of voting seriously even if our degraded election system no longer does. If this somehow wasn't clear before 2024, it should be now.
Absolutely! And we also send a message of just how many we are. Something the MSN has done everything to suppress. We surely don’t need to assist them.
If there was ever an election in which voting for a third-party candidate was the best possible choice, this is it. Only if you are chain smoking fatal doses of hopium can you believe that either Harris or Trump will actually do anything like the right or wise thing on either of the burning life and death issues facing the country over which presidents exercise direct and decisive power - Ukraine and Israel. They may have differences over abortion, immigration, trans rights, supreme court nominations and the like, but they don't have decisive power over these matters as they do in matters of war and peace. Those other issues, important as they may be, will be decided through a political process in which the president's preferences are thwarted more often than not.
All this is to say that the two-party duopoly under which we live has conspired to deny voters any meaningful say on the starkest moral and most dangerous political choices facing our nation. For that reason, the only sane and moral thing to do to express our frustration, disgust and contempt is to opt out and vote for a candidate who we believe is right on the most important and decisive issues, even if that candidate has no chance of winning under this corrupted electoral system.
A vote like this means we know our vote has already been "thrown away," not by us but by the two parties that have conspired to steal our electoral system for their own corrupt purposes. By voting against the duopoly, we declare that we care enough about our country to take our democratic act of voting seriously even if our degraded election system no longer does. If this somehow wasn't clear before 2024, it should be now.
Absolutely! And we also send a message of just how many we are. Something the MSN has done everything to suppress. We surely don’t need to assist them.