What the chocolate does that mean? The Administration is not interested in countering evils.
They are interested in power. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less. Once you pull back the mask of a sociopath, once you strip away The Will To Power, you will truly stare into the abyss.
Because, take away The Will To Power and there is literally nothing else there.
The word "should" is doing a great deal of work for you.
That said, you are right. Nobody should. But those in power care only about power. If the only way they can get compliance is "legalized coercion", through naked force and repression, then that is what they will do.
Politics and nation states are always about brute force violence. We can use pretty words like coercion but in the end the monopoly of brute force violence lies in the hands of the state.
Rights are not meaningless even if they are being violated you still get an idea of how bad
And from a purely social / society perspective, I personally believe Freedom of Association as a single right will cover most situations - but it is too radical for most people
What the chocolate does that mean? The Administration is not interested in countering evils.
They are interested in power. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less. Once you pull back the mask of a sociopath, once you strip away The Will To Power, you will truly stare into the abyss.
Because, take away The Will To Power and there is literally nothing else there.
and state power is nothing more than legalized coercion for the most part
Simply ask yourself if you are free to do that yourself
If the answer is NO, then The State should NOT be able to either - regardless of mechanisms like voting
No one should ne able to vote your rights aways
The word "should" is doing a great deal of work for you.
That said, you are right. Nobody should. But those in power care only about power. If the only way they can get compliance is "legalized coercion", through naked force and repression, then that is what they will do.
Politics and nation states are always about brute force violence. We can use pretty words like coercion but in the end the monopoly of brute force violence lies in the hands of the state.
you have a right to validate it !!
Socially, it is Freedom of Association
Any violation is a violation of that right
A right the state inherently violates by imposing itself as your government
Rights are meaningless if you cannot enforce them.
"Don't quote laws to us. We carry swords." - Gnaeus Pompeius
Rights are not meaningless even if they are being violated you still get an idea of how bad
And from a purely social / society perspective, I personally believe Freedom of Association as a single right will cover most situations - but it is too radical for most people
Good luck enforcing it.