You think it's so simple - there are names and once we know them we can do something concrete to deal with those specific individuals and everything will be good. And if it's positions - CEOs, e.g. - then just get rid of the title.
It's the super wealthy who are ultimate manipulators. It's in their interest to keep and multiply their wealth and they have means (power through wealth) to ensure that propagates and solidifies. Their will trickles down through entities they own: corporations, companies, trusts, foundations, etc. Media, tech companies, military, etc - they all do what their owners tell them to. The employees of those entities are the implementors, hence the participants.
If the super wealthy aren’t the focus, who or what is? Citizens are not going to stop fighting amongst themselves without a new narrative and a new target. If you can’t name it, then what?
You think it's so simple - there are names and once we know them we can do something concrete to deal with those specific individuals and everything will be good. And if it's positions - CEOs, e.g. - then just get rid of the title.
It's the super wealthy who are ultimate manipulators. It's in their interest to keep and multiply their wealth and they have means (power through wealth) to ensure that propagates and solidifies. Their will trickles down through entities they own: corporations, companies, trusts, foundations, etc. Media, tech companies, military, etc - they all do what their owners tell them to. The employees of those entities are the implementors, hence the participants.
If the super wealthy aren’t the focus, who or what is? Citizens are not going to stop fighting amongst themselves without a new narrative and a new target. If you can’t name it, then what?