Thanks. Seems to support my "doesn't demonize China" comment. His stance on gaming restrictions is reminiscent of '50s and '60s censorship in the US, which was mainly limited to obscenity (I know it when I see it) rather than political speech. Though your favorite political view might not get on broadcast TV, there was little attempt to shut down print publications or radio. He's a cultural conservative and yes perhaps populist. I see no contradiction and no damage to society from his views.
Is that supposed to be a refutation? The only thing I disagree with is his assertion that Yellowstone is empty. Apparently, he hasn't been there recently.
He doesn't demonize any race or nationality. He simply is saying immigration should be controlled. Caezar Chavez was in agreement with that. Immigration is bad for the underclass -- blacks, hispanics and recent Asian immigrants.
He misses way too much. Though he is interesting from time to time, he does have severe unhinged moments and his presentation is too snarky even whiney at times. I did really enjoy when he did a takedown of Bernie and told him what a non-revolution he was leading by his non-example. Maybe Tucker can tell us how USA destablizes countries all over the world and invest nothing in America? Where was he when Flint was an issue, and now he is concerned about testosterone levels? He was all over the map. Not to worry, all those jobs went East to China, Taiwan, after we were done with Japan. I am reminded of that movie Matewan, when the scabs were brought in, and most were Blacks. https://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/cesar-chavezs-complex-history-immigration/story?id=19083496
Thanks. Seems to support my "doesn't demonize China" comment. His stance on gaming restrictions is reminiscent of '50s and '60s censorship in the US, which was mainly limited to obscenity (I know it when I see it) rather than political speech. Though your favorite political view might not get on broadcast TV, there was little attempt to shut down print publications or radio. He's a cultural conservative and yes perhaps populist. I see no contradiction and no damage to society from his views.
I have not had sub TV for decades.
Good for you. It became totally worthless when they kicked RT off cable. I was referring to conditions in the '50s and '60s.
Then he will give us something like this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ka7zKnzEfs
Is that supposed to be a refutation? The only thing I disagree with is his assertion that Yellowstone is empty. Apparently, he hasn't been there recently.
He doesn't demonize any race or nationality. He simply is saying immigration should be controlled. Caezar Chavez was in agreement with that. Immigration is bad for the underclass -- blacks, hispanics and recent Asian immigrants.
He misses way too much. Though he is interesting from time to time, he does have severe unhinged moments and his presentation is too snarky even whiney at times. I did really enjoy when he did a takedown of Bernie and told him what a non-revolution he was leading by his non-example. Maybe Tucker can tell us how USA destablizes countries all over the world and invest nothing in America? Where was he when Flint was an issue, and now he is concerned about testosterone levels? He was all over the map. Not to worry, all those jobs went East to China, Taiwan, after we were done with Japan. I am reminded of that movie Matewan, when the scabs were brought in, and most were Blacks. https://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/cesar-chavezs-complex-history-immigration/story?id=19083496
https://www.dissentmagazine.org/blog/cesar-chavez-and-immigration-reform