191 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Feral Finster's avatar

In 1937, Winston Churchill stated the following while arguing in favor of allowing Jews to settle in Palestine:

“I do not admit that the dog in the manger has the final right to the manger, even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit, for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America, or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to those people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, or, at any rate, a more worldly-wise race, to put it that way, has come in and taken their place. I do not admit it. I do not think the Red Indians had any right to say, The American Continent belongs to us and we are not going to have any of these European settlers coming in here. They had not the right, nor had they the power.”

Churchill knew exactly what he was looking at in the Zionist agenda to colonize Palestine. There was no confusion whatsoever. It wasn’t until much later that history was revised through propaganda to spin this as something other than the western settler-colonialist project that it has always been.

Zionist arguments inevitably boil down to "might is right". Except when News are victims. Then "Victims Status Trumps Everything!"

Expand full comment
JennyStokes's avatar

Churchill was a racist in the employ of the Great British Colonialism.

Why did not GB allow the Israeli/Jews to live in England?

Expand full comment
Pippi Smythe's avatar

Who funded bankrupted Churchill? Same people who incorporated "Israel" and created it as a bank for the money from the oil flow.

Expand full comment
gypsy33's avatar

Greenies for YOU Feral 😼

Expand full comment