I don't understand what you are talking about. First you said that rules and laws exist solely for the oppression of lower castes and then you said only nature makes the rules. So you think nature makes oppressive rules? There are rules for reaching consensus. As far as I know they are human rules. They are not oppressive unless you are one of those people that likes to take up all the space.
YOU were talking about the difference between human law and natural law. I never said a word about it before you brought it up. I was talking about who makes the laws for people and how it could be different if it were not the elite making those laws.
I don't understand what you are talking about. First you said that rules and laws exist solely for the oppression of lower castes and then you said only nature makes the rules. So you think nature makes oppressive rules? There are rules for reaching consensus. As far as I know they are human rules. They are not oppressive unless you are one of those people that likes to take up all the space.
YOU were talking about the difference between human law and natural law. I never said a word about it before you brought it up. I was talking about who makes the laws for people and how it could be different if it were not the elite making those laws.