Actually, I'm with you as far as the need. However, you seem to naively insist there can be one and it could be:
- more or less easily found
- and, more importantly, successfully implemented
And that's where we diverge. I maintain the solutions are numerous, at least hypothetically (since you can never tell whether it turns out to be a "solution" until you've implemented it), but neither can be implemented to the benefit of the regular folks, as the control is outside the reach.
"And that's where we diverge. I maintain the solutions are numerous, at least hypothetically (since you can never tell whether it turns out to be a "solution" until you've implemented it), but neither can be implemented to the benefit of the regular folks, as the control is outside the reach."
That's weasel talk. Of all these 'numerous solutions', you have not presented one.
I know you can swear even if clumsily, but the pattern has been you never answered hard questions.
You said "In essence, that is how this country was born" meaning by dismantling the deep state. A logical question is - which deep state? The country was born on the backs of Indians, where was the Deep State?
Is that not a simple enough to understand question? I'm not saying simple to answer, but simple to understand?
Actually, I'm with you as far as the need. However, you seem to naively insist there can be one and it could be:
- more or less easily found
- and, more importantly, successfully implemented
And that's where we diverge. I maintain the solutions are numerous, at least hypothetically (since you can never tell whether it turns out to be a "solution" until you've implemented it), but neither can be implemented to the benefit of the regular folks, as the control is outside the reach.
"And that's where we diverge. I maintain the solutions are numerous, at least hypothetically (since you can never tell whether it turns out to be a "solution" until you've implemented it), but neither can be implemented to the benefit of the regular folks, as the control is outside the reach."
That's weasel talk. Of all these 'numerous solutions', you have not presented one.
Now why would you lie like that? I did. I said I'd like to go to Mars.
Are you going to say it's unrealistic? Well, is yours - Dismantling the Deep State™ - realistic?
"I said I'd like to go to Mars."
That is an excellent idea...pack your shit!
"Well, is yours - Dismantling the Deep State™ - realistic?"
In essence, that is how this country was born.
They were dismantling the Deep State? Made up of Indians?
"They were dismantling the Deep State? Made up of Indians?"
Every time you reply, you display what a dumb bastard you are.
I know you can swear even if clumsily, but the pattern has been you never answered hard questions.
You said "In essence, that is how this country was born" meaning by dismantling the deep state. A logical question is - which deep state? The country was born on the backs of Indians, where was the Deep State?
Is that not a simple enough to understand question? I'm not saying simple to answer, but simple to understand?