The "service" would be creating a wedding cake. It the customer insists on expression that conflicts with the baker's convictions, he should have every right to refuse that expression.
Only by so narrowly defining service are we to arrive at your conclusion. I forget what the exact results were in this case. Do you happen to remember?
No, don't remember. I do remember I initially sympathized with the plaintiffs but later concluded they likely contracted with that bakery precisely because they knew of the owner's views.
Is not the message on the wedding cake the exact "service" the customers are paying for?
The "service" would be creating a wedding cake. It the customer insists on expression that conflicts with the baker's convictions, he should have every right to refuse that expression.
Only by so narrowly defining service are we to arrive at your conclusion. I forget what the exact results were in this case. Do you happen to remember?
No, don't remember. I do remember I initially sympathized with the plaintiffs but later concluded they likely contracted with that bakery precisely because they knew of the owner's views.