Thanks for reminding us to ask the question, looking good to whom? It’s not a bad idea to keep in mind who his audience actually is. That’s the audience we need to find a way to influence. Perhaps we should start naming that audience, then analysing what their interests are. I wonder if we might come up with some surprises.
Here’s mine:
World leaders - interests will vary by country. Might be good to look more closely at each of them. Unlikely to be unity.
Christian Zionists - interests include Armageddon! Likely to be very single minded.
Financial institutions - looking to increase profits. Hard to see how they can profit if there’s no brakes and WWIII happens. Armageddon will not be on their agenda.
Military industry - great until there’s no one left.
Commercial interests-they want to profit by selling stuff to as many people as they can. How are the benefiting by killing off such a large market for their goods? Why isn’t this contradiction coming to light?
Energy producers - would want the oil spigots to keep flowing. The places where this is happening is among the most important sources. Those in the ME will not survive if this continues apace. Do we believe they are willing to have their livelihoods destroyed without even attempting to push back?
General public - mostly brainwashed, but it’s wearing off, exposing the racist psychopaths among us. The longer the carnage goes on, the more the public wakes up. This brings up an additional possibility that the governments who are supporting the destruction are going to be at risk from their own citizens.
Might be, we can see some areas where increasing the existing contradictions exist.
Thanks for reminding us to ask the question, looking good to whom? It’s not a bad idea to keep in mind who his audience actually is. That’s the audience we need to find a way to influence. Perhaps we should start naming that audience, then analysing what their interests are. I wonder if we might come up with some surprises.
Here’s mine:
World leaders - interests will vary by country. Might be good to look more closely at each of them. Unlikely to be unity.
Christian Zionists - interests include Armageddon! Likely to be very single minded.
Financial institutions - looking to increase profits. Hard to see how they can profit if there’s no brakes and WWIII happens. Armageddon will not be on their agenda.
Military industry - great until there’s no one left.
Commercial interests-they want to profit by selling stuff to as many people as they can. How are the benefiting by killing off such a large market for their goods? Why isn’t this contradiction coming to light?
Energy producers - would want the oil spigots to keep flowing. The places where this is happening is among the most important sources. Those in the ME will not survive if this continues apace. Do we believe they are willing to have their livelihoods destroyed without even attempting to push back?
General public - mostly brainwashed, but it’s wearing off, exposing the racist psychopaths among us. The longer the carnage goes on, the more the public wakes up. This brings up an additional possibility that the governments who are supporting the destruction are going to be at risk from their own citizens.
Might be, we can see some areas where increasing the existing contradictions exist.
I appreciate your bringing up this idea.