Yes, I am aware of many of those leaders' views. Unfortunately, their views don't carry much weight on the global stage.
I should have specified that was referring to the G7 leaders, especially the US, the UK, and Germany. Without one of them changing their official stance, the genocide will continue.
The Western World includes over 70 nations, and you include only Europe and the US, about 35. Each nation that denounces Israeli war crimes increases the pressure...so their weight, together, is influential. " several G7 nations have notably shifted their positions on Israel in recent months, reflecting growing frustration over its conduct in Gaza and the West Bank.
1. UK and France Considering Palestinian State Recognition
In a significant development, the UK and France are in discussions with Saudi Arabia about formally recognizing a Palestinian state. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy confirmed that this initiative could be announced as early as June 2025. The move is tied to conditions such as the removal of Hamas from Gaza's governance and a demilitarization process, aiming to make recognition part of a concrete path toward a two-state solution rather than a symbolic gesture.
The Guardian
2. G7 Condemnation of Israeli Settlement Expansion
The G7 foreign ministers have strongly condemned Israel's recent settlement activities in the West Bank, including the legalization of five outposts and the declaration of over 1,270 hectares as state lands. They stated that these actions are inconsistent with international law and counterproductive to the cause of peace.
Ministero degli Affari Esteri
+2
Anadolu Ajansı
+2
Al Arabiya English
+2
3. Calls for Compliance with International Law
In November 2024, G7 foreign ministers emphasized that Israel must fully comply with its obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law, in all circumstances. They expressed concern over the humanitarian situation in Gaza and called on Israel to ease obstacles to humanitarian aid.
In April 2024, the G7 foreign ministers opposed a full-scale military operation by Israel in Rafah, warning that such an action would have catastrophic consequences on the civilian population. They also criticized the unacceptable number of civilian casualties in Gaza during Israel's military offensive.
5. Support for a Two-State Solution
The G7 has reaffirmed its commitment to a two-state solution, emphasizing the importance of unifying the Gaza Strip with the West Bank under the Palestinian Authority. They stressed that mutual recognition, including the recognition of a Palestinian state at the appropriate time, is a crucial component of the political process.
\
These developments indicate a significant shift in the G7 nations' approach, moving from traditional support for Israel to a more critical stance, especially concerning humanitarian issues and the pursuit of a two-state solution." While these shifts have not yet changed things they add to the pressure and made the cost of continued Israel war more costly. We should not disparage or minimize such shifts but welcome them as allies for Palestinian liberation and pressure to change Israeli policy.
"Unfortunately, their views don't carry much weight on the global stage."
that may seem for an observer from inside of countries which would, by their own profession, "matter on the global stage". The darkness in the other side of balance of information in these countries is to the level of a black hole.
Information game has changed and they are losing the information restriction battle. In fact they lost the game already, just don't know it yet. Hence the whining as per the title of this article.
When observed from outside, it looks as a complete opposite of mainstream narratives.
Yes, I am aware of many of those leaders' views. Unfortunately, their views don't carry much weight on the global stage.
I should have specified that was referring to the G7 leaders, especially the US, the UK, and Germany. Without one of them changing their official stance, the genocide will continue.
The Western World includes over 70 nations, and you include only Europe and the US, about 35. Each nation that denounces Israeli war crimes increases the pressure...so their weight, together, is influential. " several G7 nations have notably shifted their positions on Israel in recent months, reflecting growing frustration over its conduct in Gaza and the West Bank.
1. UK and France Considering Palestinian State Recognition
In a significant development, the UK and France are in discussions with Saudi Arabia about formally recognizing a Palestinian state. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy confirmed that this initiative could be announced as early as June 2025. The move is tied to conditions such as the removal of Hamas from Gaza's governance and a demilitarization process, aiming to make recognition part of a concrete path toward a two-state solution rather than a symbolic gesture.
The Guardian
2. G7 Condemnation of Israeli Settlement Expansion
The G7 foreign ministers have strongly condemned Israel's recent settlement activities in the West Bank, including the legalization of five outposts and the declaration of over 1,270 hectares as state lands. They stated that these actions are inconsistent with international law and counterproductive to the cause of peace.
Ministero degli Affari Esteri
+2
Anadolu Ajansı
+2
Al Arabiya English
+2
3. Calls for Compliance with International Law
In November 2024, G7 foreign ministers emphasized that Israel must fully comply with its obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law, in all circumstances. They expressed concern over the humanitarian situation in Gaza and called on Israel to ease obstacles to humanitarian aid.
apnews.com
+7
Geo24 News
+7
Ministero degli Affari Esteri
+7
4. Opposition to Military Operations in Rafah
In April 2024, the G7 foreign ministers opposed a full-scale military operation by Israel in Rafah, warning that such an action would have catastrophic consequences on the civilian population. They also criticized the unacceptable number of civilian casualties in Gaza during Israel's military offensive.
5. Support for a Two-State Solution
The G7 has reaffirmed its commitment to a two-state solution, emphasizing the importance of unifying the Gaza Strip with the West Bank under the Palestinian Authority. They stressed that mutual recognition, including the recognition of a Palestinian state at the appropriate time, is a crucial component of the political process.
\
These developments indicate a significant shift in the G7 nations' approach, moving from traditional support for Israel to a more critical stance, especially concerning humanitarian issues and the pursuit of a two-state solution." While these shifts have not yet changed things they add to the pressure and made the cost of continued Israel war more costly. We should not disparage or minimize such shifts but welcome them as allies for Palestinian liberation and pressure to change Israeli policy.
"Unfortunately, their views don't carry much weight on the global stage."
that may seem for an observer from inside of countries which would, by their own profession, "matter on the global stage". The darkness in the other side of balance of information in these countries is to the level of a black hole.
Information game has changed and they are losing the information restriction battle. In fact they lost the game already, just don't know it yet. Hence the whining as per the title of this article.
When observed from outside, it looks as a complete opposite of mainstream narratives.