Actually this psychological analysis is not in fact a product of 'relatively recent history' - the true origins of it are rooted in the very ideology of Judaism (Jewism) itself, going back several thousand years of course. Nietzsche had it absolutely correct when he used the word 'resentment' to describe the motivation. No other social group in the entirety of human history has ever behaved like that, so we have to put it down the ideology. I would thus further argue that in order to defeat the propaganda and gaslighting we need to educate people about this psychology. The most effective method these Judaists have used of course to silence that very thing is to say that even just talking about this psychology is 'anti-semitic', and then labelling this word 'anti-semitic' as somehow 'morally wrong'. It's not morally wrong to point out narcissistic personality disorders or the cause of such disorders. That's what needs to change. Otherwise this coercive control will just continue.
I clearly trace the trauma of Jewish people back before recent times in this sentence: "The Jewish people have lived through great trauma, both historically, then with overwhelming suffering under the Nazi era, and then again on Oct 7.....I would not agree that the narcissistic character is of " Jewism" but rather of the nationalistic ideology of Zionism, which builds on an older history of trauma.
However, you are ignoring the myth of exalted victimhood. Which is a part of their origin myth (Moses/Exodus etc.). At that time their atrocity propaganda was directed against the Egyptians. Since then it's been directed at pretty much everyone at some point. In other words, you are assuming that their propaganda about victimhood is true. Which is isn't. Not in any exceptional or unique way, anyhow.
At the same time, they are told they are the 'master race'. That engenders racism towards every other social group (all gentiles, in other words). It's not surprising if everyone else finds that offensive, and starts acting in self-defence. This is then presented as 'unprovoked attacks' (anti-semitism etc.). But if the perpetrators are prevented from self-realising that, by this 'innocent victimhood myth', then they will continue to think that, in a paranoid way, everyone else hates them for no reason. So they never learn the lesson and grow up. Ironically, maybe people would've had more sympathy for Nazis if they too had massively pushed an exalted victim narrative themselves, seeing as normal humans empathise with perceived victims and are more likely to believe what they say (however absurd or farcical the atrocity propaganda is). It's easy for people to hate Nazis because of their perceived racism and superiority complex. But add an innocent victim narrative, and gaslighting, and it becomes a bit more difficult.
The 'trauma' I would argue is self-inflicted in the form of child abuse starting at 8 days old, followed by indoctrination and fear-based and punishment-based obedience training. Of course they can't admit they are traumatising themselves, nor can they rightly blame it on their 'Fuhrer' - Yahweh - so they have to project it onto everyone else (Gentiles).
So ultimately, your psychological analysis depends on believing the exalted victim mythology. Remove that, and the sympathy that goes along with it, and you need a completely different psychological explanation for the evil stuff they do.
And if a psychologist diagnoses a serious personality disorder in someone which makes that person a serious danger to others, I think we can all agree the psychologist is the good guy in this story. Before anyone accuses me of being the bad guy, that is.
Actually this psychological analysis is not in fact a product of 'relatively recent history' - the true origins of it are rooted in the very ideology of Judaism (Jewism) itself, going back several thousand years of course. Nietzsche had it absolutely correct when he used the word 'resentment' to describe the motivation. No other social group in the entirety of human history has ever behaved like that, so we have to put it down the ideology. I would thus further argue that in order to defeat the propaganda and gaslighting we need to educate people about this psychology. The most effective method these Judaists have used of course to silence that very thing is to say that even just talking about this psychology is 'anti-semitic', and then labelling this word 'anti-semitic' as somehow 'morally wrong'. It's not morally wrong to point out narcissistic personality disorders or the cause of such disorders. That's what needs to change. Otherwise this coercive control will just continue.
I clearly trace the trauma of Jewish people back before recent times in this sentence: "The Jewish people have lived through great trauma, both historically, then with overwhelming suffering under the Nazi era, and then again on Oct 7.....I would not agree that the narcissistic character is of " Jewism" but rather of the nationalistic ideology of Zionism, which builds on an older history of trauma.
However, you are ignoring the myth of exalted victimhood. Which is a part of their origin myth (Moses/Exodus etc.). At that time their atrocity propaganda was directed against the Egyptians. Since then it's been directed at pretty much everyone at some point. In other words, you are assuming that their propaganda about victimhood is true. Which is isn't. Not in any exceptional or unique way, anyhow.
At the same time, they are told they are the 'master race'. That engenders racism towards every other social group (all gentiles, in other words). It's not surprising if everyone else finds that offensive, and starts acting in self-defence. This is then presented as 'unprovoked attacks' (anti-semitism etc.). But if the perpetrators are prevented from self-realising that, by this 'innocent victimhood myth', then they will continue to think that, in a paranoid way, everyone else hates them for no reason. So they never learn the lesson and grow up. Ironically, maybe people would've had more sympathy for Nazis if they too had massively pushed an exalted victim narrative themselves, seeing as normal humans empathise with perceived victims and are more likely to believe what they say (however absurd or farcical the atrocity propaganda is). It's easy for people to hate Nazis because of their perceived racism and superiority complex. But add an innocent victim narrative, and gaslighting, and it becomes a bit more difficult.
The 'trauma' I would argue is self-inflicted in the form of child abuse starting at 8 days old, followed by indoctrination and fear-based and punishment-based obedience training. Of course they can't admit they are traumatising themselves, nor can they rightly blame it on their 'Fuhrer' - Yahweh - so they have to project it onto everyone else (Gentiles).
So ultimately, your psychological analysis depends on believing the exalted victim mythology. Remove that, and the sympathy that goes along with it, and you need a completely different psychological explanation for the evil stuff they do.
And if a psychologist diagnoses a serious personality disorder in someone which makes that person a serious danger to others, I think we can all agree the psychologist is the good guy in this story. Before anyone accuses me of being the bad guy, that is.