It is to do with entitled and white though. The Zionist Genocide of the Palestinians is a creation of the White Western Establishment. It goes back a long way, 108 years to the 1917 Balfour Declaration, or Balfour “Agreement” as it is sometimes referred to. The “agreeing” was between white powerful people such head Euro-Zionists the Rothschilds. Certainly the Palestinians, the majority population in the region, weren’t consulted. Therefore Israel is, and has always been, a colonial project designed to protect, promote, and exploit white entitled interests in a region rich in resources such as oil and gas. The evil we see being perpetrated today by the Israeli Zionist interlopers is a Western Military Industrial Complex creation as much now in 2025 as it was during the Nakba in 1948.
I think it’s WAY beyond what you speak of. This type of behavior has been occurring over thousands of years, and I know that they aren’t “white”. Who fomented the World Wars, and the Bolshevik Revolution-the Holodomor? And it goes on, and on…
the rich fomented the world wars. the bolshevik revolution was a reasonable attempt to get things right all in all, and the holodomor was a fuck-up. thank you for opposing the genocide in gaza. pray as hard as you can so god may hear your prayers for justice and an end to the suffering.
that seems a bit nonsensical. you obviously care who agrees with your opinion as you have read the(ir) books. which one makes the case 'the bolshevik revolution was pure evil'?
I goofed. I should have said, "Western Establishment” does not equal “white”.
"White" is simply not relevant as an indicator. What *is* relevant is your use of "entitled" and "establishment". What *is* relevant is, and has always been relevant, are sufficient combinations of things like wealth, high status, attractiveness, intelligence, social connections, access to technology, risk-proneness, and above all, psychopathy, to do evil things. That can concentrate in relatively *small* groups in various places at various times, in this case, it happened in Europe in for several most recent hundreds of years except the last.
That's what drove powerful people to do what you describe. Not whiteness -- whatever that is, beyond physical attributes of Caucasians. If it should clearly be placed geographically, then "European" is far more reasonable, and removes the irrelevant immutable identity marker.
It is to do with entitled and white though. The Zionist Genocide of the Palestinians is a creation of the White Western Establishment. It goes back a long way, 108 years to the 1917 Balfour Declaration, or Balfour “Agreement” as it is sometimes referred to. The “agreeing” was between white powerful people such head Euro-Zionists the Rothschilds. Certainly the Palestinians, the majority population in the region, weren’t consulted. Therefore Israel is, and has always been, a colonial project designed to protect, promote, and exploit white entitled interests in a region rich in resources such as oil and gas. The evil we see being perpetrated today by the Israeli Zionist interlopers is a Western Military Industrial Complex creation as much now in 2025 as it was during the Nakba in 1948.
I think it’s WAY beyond what you speak of. This type of behavior has been occurring over thousands of years, and I know that they aren’t “white”. Who fomented the World Wars, and the Bolshevik Revolution-the Holodomor? And it goes on, and on…
the rich fomented the world wars. the bolshevik revolution was a reasonable attempt to get things right all in all, and the holodomor was a fuck-up. thank you for opposing the genocide in gaza. pray as hard as you can so god may hear your prayers for justice and an end to the suffering.
The Bolshevik Revolution was pure evil. And, it is repeating itself.
The same entity is responsible.
maybe make a list of all the important people and institutions that agree with your opinion.
I could care less who agrees with factual history. Read a few books.
that seems a bit nonsensical. you obviously care who agrees with your opinion as you have read the(ir) books. which one makes the case 'the bolshevik revolution was pure evil'?
"White Western Establishment" does not equal "white" any more than "Black" equals, say, Black Enterprise magazine's "Black Royalty".
Zionists do this kind of shit. Don't be them.
I agree, “White Western Establishment” does not equal “white”, it equals “White Western Establishment”.
Quite what you mean by implying I’m tantamount to being a Zionist is unclear.
I goofed. I should have said, "Western Establishment” does not equal “white”.
"White" is simply not relevant as an indicator. What *is* relevant is your use of "entitled" and "establishment". What *is* relevant is, and has always been relevant, are sufficient combinations of things like wealth, high status, attractiveness, intelligence, social connections, access to technology, risk-proneness, and above all, psychopathy, to do evil things. That can concentrate in relatively *small* groups in various places at various times, in this case, it happened in Europe in for several most recent hundreds of years except the last.
That's what drove powerful people to do what you describe. Not whiteness -- whatever that is, beyond physical attributes of Caucasians. If it should clearly be placed geographically, then "European" is far more reasonable, and removes the irrelevant immutable identity marker.