Ah yes—‘pre-existing conditions.’ What were they before, Humana or United Healthcare underwriters? That’s a new twist on the excuses of every monstrous regime when they starve people to death—and a convenient shield for their apologists, so they can pretend they’re not complicit in evil. Maybe the NYT can follow up with a piece on how Auschwitz victims were just chronically malnourished. Funny how, when the politics align, deliberate famine gets repackaged as a healthcare crisis. Eichmann would’ve killed for this kind of PR. You literally cannot make this shit up.
I am sitting here thinking how ridiculous this whole situation is. I’ve finally cracked the code. The victims of the Nazis and Zionists weren’t murdered—they merely experienced “acute food insecurity in conflict zones.” Just an unfortunate failure of resource allocation and personal wellness management. If only they’d addressed their dietary deficiencies, evacuated from designated “nutritional risk zones,” and enrolled in an IDF Resilience Program™, maybe things would’ve turned out fine. Perhaps Auschwitz just lacked access to resilient supply chains or failed to meet Nazi food equity benchmarks.
But don’t call it genocide—call it a systemic breakdown in sustainable hunger mitigation strategy. Obviously, the real blame lies with the children.
Ah yes—‘pre-existing conditions.’ What were they before, Humana or United Healthcare underwriters? That’s a new twist on the excuses of every monstrous regime when they starve people to death—and a convenient shield for their apologists, so they can pretend they’re not complicit in evil. Maybe the NYT can follow up with a piece on how Auschwitz victims were just chronically malnourished. Funny how, when the politics align, deliberate famine gets repackaged as a healthcare crisis. Eichmann would’ve killed for this kind of PR. You literally cannot make this shit up.
I am sitting here thinking how ridiculous this whole situation is. I’ve finally cracked the code. The victims of the Nazis and Zionists weren’t murdered—they merely experienced “acute food insecurity in conflict zones.” Just an unfortunate failure of resource allocation and personal wellness management. If only they’d addressed their dietary deficiencies, evacuated from designated “nutritional risk zones,” and enrolled in an IDF Resilience Program™, maybe things would’ve turned out fine. Perhaps Auschwitz just lacked access to resilient supply chains or failed to meet Nazi food equity benchmarks.
But don’t call it genocide—call it a systemic breakdown in sustainable hunger mitigation strategy. Obviously, the real blame lies with the children.
Well said Michael Lynch! Sometimes use of satire adds poignancy to the absurdity of Israeli/Zionist behavior.
Yes. We all have a genius for prevarication, and it's now biting our ass.